Reply With Quote
Reminding the world that if Kobe didn't choke, it would have been Lakers (not LA Lakers, but Minny + LA Lakers) = 17, Celtics = 16.
But no, Kobe choked, and it is Celtics 17, Lakers 16. Now, and in the foreseeable future.
Cobby...and these
Reminding the world that if Kobe didn't choke, it would have been Lakers (not LA Lakers, but Minny + LA Lakers) = 17, Celtics = 16.
But no, Kobe choked, and it is Celtics 17, Lakers 16. Now, and in the foreseeable future.
And you told me you don't obsess with Kobe. Yet he's the topic of the majority of your posts.
You really need to get a life. Maybe go back to school and get your GED? Learn a little something about life and how the world works AMB. I think it will really help because you clearly cannot be as re ed as you constantly appear in this forum.
However, your previous post was correct. The Lakers are one shy of the Celtics. What a BRILLIANT observation!!! I do find it funny how you bring Kobe into the picture as the entire reason why the Lakers are not the top dog but completely ignore the Baylor/West teams that lost for an entire decade to them. I imagine that comes with the Kobe obsession. Well, that along with your lack of logical reasoning skills.
No worries about the Spurs catching the Lakers in my lifetime either!Even if your boys win every other year for the next 20 years, you will still be behind the great Lakers in NBA lore. Let's see, even if the Lakers don't ring it would take your team 22 years to catch up at that rate since the entire world knows they completely suck at defending les.
Last edited by cobbler; 08-17-2016 at 07:00 PM.
They sold it again the next year
True story cant deny that they have 17 and we gave it to them ...
Meanwhile......Da mamba is begging to get back into the team....plz send me friends......pathetic“I’ve spoken to Luke [Walton] several times and B-Shaw (Brian Shaw) as well, and I let the players know that I’m always around. If you want to come out, get up early in the morning and work out and walk them through some things. The Lakers are in my blood, man
Read more at http://www.slamonline.com/nba/watch-...rUrdTCruj1s.99
In another thread you posted something along the lines of "Why can't we discuss and debate openly and leave agendas out of it" when the thread went off topic. (paraphrasing here because I am too lazy to find it)
So why are you bringing up Kobe in a TD thread? Pathetic.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hypocrisy
Last edited by cobbler; 08-17-2016 at 10:14 PM.
enjoy it, by the time they win one again...and these
just enjoy the past, not the present nor future....and these
a) Not sure why you are so obsessed about me being potentially obsessed over Kobe
b) your rule - people stating opinions cannot be challenged. My opinion is that I am not obsessed about Kobe, so based on your logic, I cannot be challenged
c) Not sure what a GED is.
d) I thought name calling is way below you, why are you doing it?
e) I am not sure what that will make you if I am re ed, because I logically explained to you how more than 10 items can be widely accepted in a top 10 lists. You know what? I can actually mathematically prove it, but since I am re ed, I am sure you are not interested.
Given your extreme smartness, I am surprised:
a) Saying something doesn't exclude me from believing other things
b) Glad you finally realized there are no such things as logic skills when you try to lecture people
c) Celtics/Lakers weren't close in ring count during the Baylor/West days because the LA Lakers had 0 rings back then. But if you want to include the Minny ones, it was Russell who overtook the Lakers. I would have been inconsistent if I blamed Baylor/West and praised the Celtics for keeping the ring. Instead, I am praising the Russell Celtics (as I should) and then attributing blame on the Kobe Lakers. I am just being consistent, but you can't tell because of your incredible logica
Not too concerned about the Spurs catching up to the Lakers, because I admit the Lakers were a class A organization. They haven't even missed back to back to back playoffs or won less than 30 games since the 82 game schedule was introduced. They have been to the finals in like half of their existence. That is dominance.No worries about the Spurs catching the Lakers in my lifetime either!
Oh wait, sorry, I forgot it's no longer 2013, things kind of went downhill after that.
I love how you bring up the one subject that I actually agreed with you on and admitted I misunderstood as a point of your superior intellect and yet left off the other couple dozen points where I showed you to be the fool you are. Your own Spurs buddies were even mocking you for gosh sakes. But thats all water under the bridge anyway.
The Lakers are down 17 to 16 with regards to the Celtics. Spin it however you want but Kobe's Laker team was only responsible for one loss and one win against the dreaded green stains. Baylor and West lost to them 8 and 7 times respectively with ZERO victories. But yeah, go ahead and spin it that Kobe is the reason the Celts are at the top of the NBA champions list. You Kobe obsessors are an odd lot that's for sure.
I am not going to waste anymore time with your nonsense and trying to make excuses for your lack of logic and outright common sense. And by the way, a GED is a general education degree. It's equivalent to graduation of high school for those who didn't.
I think the following pic of you says it all. You should change your avatar to more accurately represent yourself.
Last edited by cobbler; 08-18-2016 at 05:20 PM.
Its not surprising Chang doesn't know what a GED is. His reasoning skills are well below it
Not entire sure what the other couple of dozen points you had were, because when asked for specifics, you just chickened out. Your tact was very much "I already told you you are an idiot, so I won". But how? What were the specific points you've proven? The ones that other Spurs fans chimed in on is around how people's opinions cannot be argued, but I disagree, because there are clear hidden agendas. Raja Bell just said he always answered the question "Who is the toughest for him to guard?" by saying Kobe every time because that's what people want to hear, but the truth is really Manu. I also noted about how people say things in public for specific reasons to avoid controversy.
I further demonstrated that you saying that I am obsessed with Kobe cannot be argued using your logic because you are not en led to question my opinions of my own obsessions. You just didn't follow your own rules.
The third point we argued about was around how you cannot have multiple people saying "I agree" on a topic, and had to say "we agree". You already admitted at fault on that point, in addition to the "number of items" on a list topic.
Overall, I recall three logical topics we argued about, two of them you admitted were wrong, the third one you were shown either wrong, of you don't even follow you own rules.
I am not sure what the other "couple of dozen points" (that would be at least 24 points) would be. Would be helpful if you can even list 4 or 5 of them.
Remember you can't argue that with me? Or are you now conceding that opinions of one person's viewpoint can be argued?The Lakers are down 17 to 16 with regards to the Celtics. Spin it however you want but Kobe's Laker team was only responsible for one loss and one win against the dreaded green stains. Baylor and West lost to them 8 and 7 times respectively with ZERO victories. But yeah, go ahead and spin it that Kobe is the reason the Celts are at the top of the NBA champions list. You Kobe obsessors are an odd lot that's for sure.
I never said Kobe is the sole reason Celtics at the top of the list, but he was the one who handed 17 to the Celtics. That is a fact.
Again, you promised not to respond before but continued to, so I am not sure how seriously to take this "threat" this time around.
I may not be the most logical person on earth, all I know that is that I am logical enough to be better than you on it.
Not entirely sure what the point is. I personally think gorillas are majestic animals and a wonder of nature.I think the following pic of you says it all. You should change your avatar to more accurately represent yourself.
That really speaks more about you and cobbler than it does me.
Buddy, don't be too hard on yourself.
It's quite simple really. You see, that's a big ole fat turd in his mouth. I just think it would be a more appropriate avatar for ya since all you do is talk a lot of and go in circles.
Keep obsessing AMB. You wear it very well!
You sound obsessed with gorillas though
What do you mean obsessing AMB? You mean you are obsessed with me and will continue, or are you suggesting I should obsess over myself?
But your response really left a lot of things unanswered for me, and given I am someone of such deplorable logical thinking skills, I would need your input to help me out:
1) Why are you responding when you said you are not going to waste your time? Did you lie the first time, or do you just like to waste time? Or maybe you can't keep your word? What about you being obsessed with me? Any other possibilities?
2) What are the dozen other points where you have proven my lack of logic?
3) You said there was only one point where you agreed with me and you were wrong on, and yet I found at least one other one. Is it that you actually meant there was one, but there could be more? Or did you just forget? You seem to think there were dozens of points where I showed I was a fool, what were those? Can you list them out? Or are you the one who is really talking out of your ass?
4) Why are you trying to dictate what avatar I use? Am I not en led to choose an avatar where I find appropriate? Am I en led to my own opinions of what would represent me well, or can that be argued?
Ok I guess I'll help you out... again.
1) I wasted no time to post a single sentence. It was done out of the kindness in my heart to point out how often you sound like you are full of on this forum.
2) If after all this banter you don't know then I am sorry, I just can't help you on this. I'm certainly not going to rehash them all like you seem to like to do over and over thus my comment about you going in circles. No matter how many times you repeat yourself, it's not going to change the outcome.
3) See number two Mr Circle Man.
4) I am not trying to dictate anything. Maybe you should look up the word. I was simply suggesting an avatar much like your's but one that a little more accurate with reference to your postings.
...and last but not least, you obsess about Kobe quite a lot and I certainly can understand that with you being a Spurs fan. You, like many others here, bring him up a lot in your lame attempts to troll of Laker fans. And no, I am so not obsessed with you AMB. I only posted to you after you responded to my post with the LOB's. Yikes! Get over your talking self already.
No need to bother thanking me. I am always glad to help out those with who are a little slow and need guidance.
Last edited by cobbler; 08-19-2016 at 03:30 PM.
First time I saw this, so it is inconsistent with your "again" comment above.
But then, what I posted was non-sense, why would you have kindness towards nonsense?
I read it as you can't. If there were so many of them, it shouldn't be hard to just point it out. It would take you less effort to type out just ONE example instead of the line you typed above.
You should be able to find one, out of the kindness of your heart.
You didn't suggest me changing it, you said I should. Very different meanings. Maybe your logical thinking skills will let you understand what the differences are one day. And again, this is the first time I saw this comment, so inconsistent with the "again" comment above.
Third point that is the first time that shown up in our conversation, so another inconsistency with your "again" comment.
I am not going to "Thank" you at all, because you still haven't pointed out any of the dozens of points you have shown me as a fool. Can't really thank anyone who can't provide any type of specific examples for improvement.
And I believe this is the time "again" should be used, as in asking you again why can you argue with me about my own determination of my own view of Kobe? It's my opinion of my own state of mind, by your own definition, it is inarguable.
Finally, why would a Spurs fan troll a Lakers fan on a site called SPURStalk? Wouldn't it make more sense the other way around?
AMB is a noodle egg roll eating git who wants to Kobe with his 3.5 incher.....
What a surprise, still unable to come up with any of the couple of dozens of examples I was shown a fool
I don't have to keep reposting what has already been hashed out to try to convince you. That's your style. Repeating posts over and over doesn't make them come true AMB. And whining like a little baby or asking others how they could come to the conclusions that you are an idiot doesn't change anybody's minds. Are you a woman? Maybe a teen? Cause you sure come off as a whiny little ( talking) .
You wear it so well.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
