he was ok, looks like a mook tbh.
Spiderman 1 was good
2nd was great
3rd was
he was ok, looks like a mook tbh.
Toby looked the part but was pretty bad in the first, and mediocre in the second, the 3rd is a hot mess. Franco was just awful in all three, he was stiff, and he delivered his lines in a way that came off as unintentionally funny.
Spiderman 1-3.0/5. The scene on the bridge was great but the costume for the Green goblin, bad acting, slow pacing (granted for character backstory) were the issues.
Spiderman 2- 4.5/5 Action scenes still hold up, Doc Octo was great the train scene along when they are fighting on the skyscraper were classic.
Spiderman 3- 2.5/5 Just no.
Amazing Spiderman-4/5 Like Garfield much better, more charisma and like the idea of Parker being a bit of a sarcastic punk instead of a shy, awkward nerd. Action scenes were solid.
Amazing Spiderman 2- 3/5 Not great but not Spiderman 3 bad.
Pretty much. The 3rd was worse than Daredevil.
Curious about this movie, heard there are supposed to be three villians and Iron Man in it. Would love to have this build toward a sinister 6 vs Spiderman.
The 3rd was as bad as the Amazing Spiderman and its sequel.
What are you doing to me LM?
Vulture (Keaton), Tinkerer, Shocker
Stark will be in the movie, but only as Stark
gay
maybe shes still white but just played by a black actress.
lets hope
black mary jane would make sense in spiderman 3 with the black spidey suit imho tbh fwiw
Who cares, except for racists?
So apparently MJ Watson will be black in the new Spiderman movie
As if having Ben Affleck as Batman isn't worse.
Since she's not a doctor you should be ok.
Actually I thought Batfleck was good
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)