LeBron loves pop

[UZER]

Lebron doesn't strike me as someone who will play till 38-39 yo..So yeah, I could see him retiring at next Olympics at 36...

Becaus he'll really be 40.

[houston spurs fan]

No, he wouldn't..

- Lebron would never play for a White coach again
- Lebron just beat the best RS team in NBA history with a puppet at head coach..why would he want an authoritative figure like Pop when he doesn't even need him to win a le? Pure homerism and stupidity, tbh..

Yeah, no . The Cavs aren't making a coaching change and LeBron is never comming to SA. But great players want to play for great coaches and to turn this into a race thing, c'mon bro' it's a bad take. But I get it, you try to be "edgy". Trying too hard per par, you need a new shtick. Don't understand why you troll here and all those other forums like that Laker's place. What do you gain out of it, just makes you feel important I suppose...

[exstatic]

Becaus he'll really be 40.

Don't let the HGH fool you. He's not that old.

[K...]

Don't let the HGH fool you. He's not that old.

That's the joke

[TD 21]

Calling Pop "the greatest NBA coach of all-time" isn't such a bold statement on the surface, but it is when you consider how most players, along with antiquated/casual media and fans, usually judge such things.

James, like others who share this view, probably think this because he has 5 rings, without an all-time great perimeter player or dominant physical force like O'Neal. He probably thinks, "How many would he have with me, Jordan, Bryant, etc.?"

So really what this is, is the usual slap in the face to Duncan, the player, specifically and the big three in general. Sure, they wax on about Duncan's intangibles, but you can tell they think playing for Pop and his "system" (which was actually only his system for a few years and only looked they way it did because of the personnel), is most responsible for the 5 rings.

[dabom]

Calling Pop "the greatest NBA coach of all-time" isn't such a bold statement on the surface, but it is when you consider how most players, along with antiquated/casual media and fans, usually judge such things.

James, like others who share this view, probably think this because he has 5 rings, without an all-time great perimeter player or dominant physical force like O'Neal. He probably thinks, "How many would he have with me, Jordan, Bryant, etc.?"

So really what this is, is the usual slap in the face to Duncan, the player, specifically and the big three in general. Sure, they wax on about Duncan's intangibles, but you can tell they think playing for Pop and his "system" (which was actually only his system for a few years and only looked they way it did because of the personnel), is most responsible for the 5 rings.

I can understand this. Duncan also carried Porker.

[wildbill2u]

Did anyone post this link on the same subject?

https://deref-mail.com/mail/client/S...noRedirect%3D1