Reply With Quote
How did I know to write my response at the same time you wrote yours. Go watch more basketball if you haven't heard the term.
RacistUnless you think me saying "black hole" is the racist part. Usually people say he is a "black hole on offense/defense". I'm not talking about his skin you stupid .
How did I know to write my response at the same time you wrote yours. Go watch more basketball if you haven't heard the term.
Can anyone else educate this ing moron for me. Obviously he isn't gonna believe me.
The Spurs catered their offense around Enrique for those couple years after TD and Manu declined. Those loop plays, screen after screen to put him at an advantage against his defender. There's no doubt in my mind that if they did the same for MVPaddy he would put up better scoring averages than Enrique 'can't shoot' Porker ever did tbh.
Fatty is best suited to come off the bench since he has a better chance of not getting killed by backup PGs. Porker also has better chemistry w/ LMA & at least has the size not to get bullied by starting PGs.
Of course here come the nitwits to turn this into a Parker thread..
Only reason I see is Tony is better than Patty just "because".
Only reason I see is Tony is better than Patty just "because".
I think this is a lost in translation moment. Saying someone is a black hole is not racist. Its a figure of speech.
If someone says something like " that is like the pot calling the kettle black" it is not meant to be racist.
Damn, dabom is relentless with his attacks, tbh
Patty Mills TS% in the playoffs last 4 years.
Tony Parker Playoff TS% last 4 years
2012-13 24 SAS NBA PG 9 31 13.5 .600 .700 .000 3.8 7.2 5.5 10.6 0.0 0.0 9.1 16.8 0.1 0.0 0.1 .119 3.0 -3.3 -0.3 0.0 2013-14 ❍ 25 SAS NBA PG 23 351 16.2 .573 .560 .092 1.0 10.4 5.8 14.6 2.5 0.2 8.7 21.3 0.5 0.5 1.1 .146 3.6 0.2 3.8 0.5 2014-15 26 SAS NBA PG 7 112 23.4 .744 .667 .310 3.7 14.8 9.1 11.9 0.9 0.0 9.5 21.1 0.5 0.1 0.6 .262 7.4 -0.7 6.8 0.2 2015-16 27 SAS NBA PG 10 167 15.2 .571 .679 .208 0.0 9.1 4.8 17.9 2.2 0.0 12.2 18.4 0.2 0.2 0.4 .124 3.7 -1.1 2.6 0.2
2012-13 30 SAS NBA PG 21 765 21.5 .521 .085 .307 2.2 7.8 5.1 34.6 1.7 0.3 11.3 28.9 1.7 0.8 2.4 .152 3.6 -0.8 2.8 0.9 2013-14 ❍ 31 SAS NBA PG 23 719 15.8 .531 .101 .202 0.8 6.4 3.7 26.1 1.1 0.2 14.1 28.3 0.3 0.7 1.1 .071 0.0 -1.3 -1.2 0.1 2014-15 32 SAS NBA PG 7 210 6.5 .386 .099 .187 2.0 10.0 5.8 18.9 0.5 0.0 10.0 23.4 -0.4 0.1 -0.3 -0.067 -6.2 -0.3 -6.5 -0.2 2015-16 33 SAS NBA PG 10 264 14.3 .499 .163 .143 0.5 8.7 4.8 31.4 1.2 0.6 14.7 21.6 0.2 0.3 0.4 .079 0.7 -1.5 -0.9 0.1
So this proves Patty is a better Crunch Time shooter.
It's also very sad that Tony has been on a decline too. The gap will be bigger next year. Not just shooting percentages of course.
Yeah i know man, I'm just trolling this foo, which doesn't take much hahahaha
Damn, dabom is relentless with his attacks, tbh
People always read too much into FIBA. It doesn't matter how good Mills looks in that; in the NBA, guards that can score, but can't defend or run a team, are sixth men. That's what he is (I know Ginobili is really sixth, but I mean in terms of caliber) and will remain until he's not good enough to fill that role anymore.
Guess Tony ain't even an NBA player at his point.
Not on politics, that's for f*cking sure hahahaahI swear, I educate lots of people on here...
Brah, you got some potential. Don't ruin it by going at me...
Why does mills suck so bad in real life. 6 minutes a game vs Okc ain't gonna cut it
Just playin, champ, I like politics off the forum tbh
You got back on my neutral side.
LOLYou got back on my neutral side.
Going a tad too far
Parker and Mills for Westbrook!
Yer Patty and Pau were both very good. Pau looks in super shape. I was a bit surprised how well he moved.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
