Another dumb Spurs fan I see.
You do realize that a triple consists of two le defenses (doubles)? Well, apparently not.
Understandable though since, as a Spurs fan, you have no experience with your team defending les.![]()
So 9 rings?
Another dumb Spurs fan I see.
You do realize that a triple consists of two le defenses (doubles)? Well, apparently not.
Understandable though since, as a Spurs fan, you have no experience with your team defending les.![]()
Thats why the "or" function exists. You can't use "and" without using the sum.
Uneducated gimpy .
Do you spit or swallow ?
Will you suck my dirty hairy balls....spit on them for me baby....
He means hairballs.
He hurls them routinely after eating his mom's hairy asshole daily. This chump can't even live rent free in his own mom's basement.
2009 - 2010 = double, True
2000 - 2001 = double, True
2001 - 2002 = double, True
2000 - 2002 = triple, True
True and True and True and True = True
True or True or True or True = True
Here's another for ya...
5th & 2nd 5th <> 6
But when it all boils down, the simple math is 16 > 5.
Last edited by cobbler; 09-07-2016 at 12:18 AM.
And the simple truth is you're a lame holding onto the past to try and remain in the debate when there is no debate. LA simply hasn't been relevant in 5 years and is about another 5 years away from relevancy. It's simple, so simple hopefully you can understand it.
I have absolutely no problem understanding we have been down for 5 years. It's the truth. Duh. Relevancy means absolutely nothing to me. There is winning the le and there is not. There is one winner and 29 losers. Period. See the simplicity?
The Lakers were relevant in the 60's and what did that get them? Zilch! If you want to talk relevancy then the Lakers are the greatest franchise EVER and there is no debate. However, the truth is the Green Pukes are number one. And you won't see us Laker fans talking about relevancy to make our inferior position to the Celts seem otherwise. Relevancy does't fill the trophy case.
In the last 10 years the Lakers have 2 les and the Spurs have two les. Oh so simple...
The Lakers will win their 17th before the Spurs win their 6th.
Reach around and finger yourself ....:
Another fgt post
You should explain this to Chaz. He's only flying 11 banners (plus a bas ized blue one) in Staples.
And our blue one equals the sum total of spurs banners. Go figure. Doesn't bother me one little bit that you feel its a bas . Like I said you won't see us Laker fans talking about relevancy to make our inferior position to the Celts seem otherwise. If thats what you sorry ass insecure Spur fans need to do then so be it. Clearly a sign of weakness on your part.
You are ant #4 and will most likely stay there for the foreseeable future. And as I have told you before, the Lakers can entirely toss out the Minny les and the showtime les and they still trump the Spurs.![]()
So Kobe rang in 87 and 88? No
You're not very bright.
You cannot count the same year twice and call it a double.
Otherwise, a batter should get a single, double, triple and a home run for each HR they hit.
However, 4 consecutive missed playoffs to cap Kobe's career, there's your double double triple double.
Good catch. It's fixed. I meant 2009-2010. We have so many repeats it sometimes gets confusing.
And why not? They are doubles that ulated into a triple. We'll call them whatever we wish. When your guys actually accomplish ONE le defense then you can talk. Until then, you make no rules.
So again,
2009 - 2010 = double, True
2000 - 2001 = double, True
2001 - 2002 = double, True
2000 - 2002 = triple, True
single = HR, False
double = HR, False
triple = HR, False
single & double & triple = HR, False
And leave it to a dumb spur fan to say you cannot do something then turn around two sentences later and do just that because he has an unhealthy obsession with Kobe. Totally understandable that you guys are so obsessed with the guy though. I imagine I would be too if one player throttled our boys in the playoffs repeatedly. Kinda how I feel about some of the Celtics.
And just for your information DMC. I'm no Kobe nut hugger. He's simply a great player that helped our team win 5 championships. He's not even one my top 5 Lakers so you are wasting your time thinking I would get all upset or defensive like you TD panty lickers do.
Last edited by cobbler; 09-07-2016 at 12:49 AM.
Thanks for sharing your imaginary system with the class. Can I get back to not caring?
Absolutely! Go right back to not caring with your replies.![]()
Yea, I don't care about my replies to you.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)