Reply With Quote
the current president tweeted it admit it
The man will retweet anything.
the current president tweeted it admit it
Setec Astronomy •
Own it Libs.
You are backing this year's version of Romney. And her electoral fate will be the same.
Own it.
Trump needs to work on his math. Half of his supporters don't cons ute nearly half the country. Not even 15% of the country...
Heck, very likely Romney > Shillary. The real question here is why Trump is the candidate.
the right so desperate to try to equate the 47 comment to this.
It will be an even worst feeling when this actually doesn't have any bearing on the polls or outcome of what will be a Hillary win.
False hope.
clinton wanted to use one device for her email but the fbi said she had 13 devices plus her server
1 does not =13 she needs more math help then trump!
well that is one number in the USAbunsniff Istvan • 2 hours ago
It turned.me.from johnson to trump. And i.dont much like trump.
Jill Stein also got herself arrested for vandalizing some bulldozer in the Dakotas the other day. Or at least she has a warrant out for her arrest.
Just the right huh?
It will be an even worst feeling when this actually doesn't have any bearing on the polls or outcome of what will be a Hillary win.
False hope.
"'Basket of deplorables' reminds me of 'binders full of women.' Equally tone deaf statements divorced from reality," tweeted Lis Smith, Obama's director of rapid response during his 2012 campaign.
David Axelrod, a former chief strategist to Obama who is now a CNN commentator, referenced the controversy over Obama's "guns and religion" line at a 2008 fundraiser, tweeting, "Fundraiser remarks are treacherous things."
Speaking to CNN's Michael Smerconish Saturday morning, Bob Beckel, who managed Walter Mondale's 1984 presidential campaign, offered no defense of Clinton.
"It's the wrong thing to say," Beckel said.
Irrelevant people.
Beckel?
But hey, if you feel so confident about this, wanna ele bet me? Clinton will still be leading Trump by the end of next week.
I'll let you decide the stakes. In?
Romney would have easily beaten her. I have no clue why he didn't run. If he doesn't seek the nomination in 2020 he's a ing moron.
I will not every support Romney, Cruz or kasich
I know several Cruz supporters who will not ever vote for him as president and who do not like Romney
Romney should have ran if he was going to and not saw and do what he is doing now
Even know he is is saying Johnson should be in the president debate
Even though Johnson can not be according to the rules!
Has anybody found any Trash defender saying Hillary was wrong to call Trash's bigots and racists as what they are?
Has anybody found any Trash defender denying that Trash's supporters aren racist, bigoted?
The point was its not just the right discussing her blunder, how that went over your head and somehow made you think I'm confident (in what?) I'm still trying to figure out.Irrelevant people.
Beckel?
But hey, if you feel so confident about this, wanna ele bet me? Clinton will still be leading Trump by the end of next week.
I'll let you decide the stakes. In?
Your offer of a bet is stupid on two levels. 1 I never said it would drop her below Trump, I never even mentioned Trump.
2 I would never give up the opportunity to show you how dumb you can be at times. It's fun to watch you finally realize it and try and pretend it never happened.
Nate Silver @NateSilver538
Hard to say how many racists/"deplorables" there are. ~5% of the electorate by some measures, ~50% by others. http://53eig.ht/R0Ma08
You know, I marvel at your stupidity. It's funny you would parrot that and say it to me as of I'm the clueless one.
So why don't you read this post of mine.
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post8722283
Then look at your own irelevant follow up.
I clearly referenced the 47 comment which is what this thread is all about and what the right is trying to liken it as.
You posted 3 different people alluding to an entirely different thing. Women full of blinders, guy saying he doesn't defend this and that fundraisers can be a tricky thing or something like that. Never did they mentioned 47 percent or liken it to it.
So it's funny reading you say you like to take oportunities to show how dumb I am when you can't even follow a simple post.
So why don't you tell me how you are realizing this embarrassing moment right now?
Hillary Clinton’s campaign is urging her surrogates to blame the media for having a double standard if they're pressed about her derogatory dig at "half" of Donald Trump supporters being "deplorables," The Washington Post reports.
The media as a hole and social media have been helping Clinton why blame the media
Alright man, is everything you post made up or what? I always have to fact check you and you're always wrong.
Are you getting this off of Trump Twitter or what? Because it's not on the news or even on their own site.
Reck proven wrong again
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions