Reply With Quote
Ok
I commend you this time ducks. You delivered.
Next time, post the actual link with your claims. This story really doesn't show up if you go to their site directly. In the front page anyway.
Ok
Romney is/was a terrible candidate. You just don't think so because he's not running. The entire crop of GOP candidates couldn't beat the worst candidate of all time, so when people say X would have beaten Clinton easily, it's pretty laughable considering that they couldn't even beat Trump. Maybe they would beat her, but it sure as would be close and not some open and shut case like some have tried to paint it as. Doing so ignores that how many people will vote for their nominee regardless of what they say or do. The current race should not be close (and electorally its not), but we have a 3-4 point popular vote margin currently.
In any event, compare this to the 47% gaffe all you want. Romney was being critical of people being poor, Hilary is being critical of people being racist, xenophobic, Islamophobic, and misogynistic. And if anything, Clinton's 1/2 estimate was low. You need look no further than poll numbers showing that around half or more of Trump supporters have negative views toward blacks, immigrants, and Muslilms. People can act outraged all she wants, but the facts are there. She's not the one appealing to the alt right and forgoing dog whistles for outright racist remarks.
Every reminder that keeps Donald Trumps racism at the forefront of the conversation is a good one even if the right tries to paint Clinton as the villain.
Good stuff^
Except that Hillary is very easily made a villain. Primarily because she is. What she is not, is a crazy fck.
Personally I am quite pleased Ducks and SA represent the Trumpets. If we had sane posters actually making a clear argument for Trump as a good candidate.... Yikes.
So no Repug has yet said Hillary was lying?
No Repug has said Trash's supporters are NOT bigots, racists, xenophobes?
Repugs are so sensitive, maybe they need a "safe space" where their sensitivities won't be "triggered" by such blatant truths that Repugs are bigots, racists, xenophobes, misogynists?
Had it not been for his ups selecting Ryan and spouting teabagger rhetoric to shore up a voting bloc he had already locked up Romney would have had a real chance to beat Obama in 2012. And Hillary is no Obama by any stretch of the imagination, she is rightfully known as a war hawk in the pockets of the criminals who crashed our economy 8 years ago and her negatives reflect that people know it. I imagine Romney will run in 2020 and have a great case to get the nomination by pointing to how much damage Trump has done to the GOP brand. Unless the economy really starts growing under Clinton she is going to be extremely vulnerable to someone like Romney who could get crossover appeal, and Romney was a guy who got elected governor in deep blue Massachusetts.
the partisan division is close, so that stands to reason. your point that Trump won the primaries means that the people he defeated wouldn't be better rivals against HRC in the general is less persuasive -- the general election is a much different sort of contest than the GOP primary.Maybe they would beat her, but it sure as would be close and not some open and shut case like some have tried to paint it as
I do think that most of guys who lost to Trump in the primary would be stronger than Trump in the general election, and that most of them would be favorites against HRC, who is a historically unpopular and deeply flawed candidate. But who knows with theses silly counterfactuals -- they're not testable.
Romney will be 73 in 2020 - his time has passed. But a Romney-type could do serious damage in the 2020 general if Trump gets his ass handed to him in November.
I imagine Rubio, Ryan and Cruz will all be eyeing 2020. If Trump loses a close one, Cruz will feel emboldened that he could get away with his brand of nuttiness and put together a combination of the Trump base, the evangelicals and tea partiers to stave off the establishment. If Trump loses in a landslide and damages the Senate GOP in the process, Rubio or Ryan will feel they can sing a more moderate tune and make a serious run.
I don't know about most of them, that seems like a stretch. Carson, Cruz, and Fiorina would probably go down in flames in a general with their weird rightwing conspiracy theories that turn off undecideds. Rubio is kind of an empty suit so I'm not so sure about him. Christie is too fat to get elected, he looks terrible on TV and stupid like that matters in elections. Kasich and Bush would have beaten her though and Kasich will surely be a strong compe or in 2020.
No other Repug asshole would have beaten Hillary.
Repugs always lose women, blacks, youth, Asians, Latinos, and the Repugs know it.
Not enough pissed off old white racist men to overcome that demographic deficit
Except for the Repugs cheating in OH in '04, dubya and head would have been one-term LOSERS.
That's why the Repugs, knowing they are demographically ED now and for years to come, got their tools on SCOTUS to gut the VRA so the Repugs could rig elections, gerrymander, redistrict, suppress voters with even more vigor than before.
Repugs MUST CHEAT to win. Their candidates are ALL so extreme right wing, so anti-governance, so corrupted by BigMoney, that they have marginalized themselves.
The Repug base revolting by supporting Trash? I bet the Repugs "learn" as much from it, as they did after their R/R 2012 massacre.
If Biden would have challenged and had won... He could have used a compassion angle that might have left him well above the fray of deeply flawed megalomania and deceit.
fair enough. Kasich and Bush and Pence seems like a fair list to me. Rubio would've had a chance, but I agree he's weak sauce.don't know about most of them, that seems like a stretch
Romney is a year older than Clinton and a year younger than Trump. I don't think you can write him off for age yet.
What's wrong with her, tbh?
are you worried, or pumping your fist?
Well, that's bad, and Fox will run with it 24 hours/day for at least this week. Trash will kick her while she's down, it's the Repug "fair play" ethic.
now, she must have medical checkup and release the results.
Anyway, Bernie, or Biden, could step in and destroy Trash easily.
The Hill tries to downplay the report by attributing it to a "Fox" source. In true lib fashion that "source" - reporting to Fox or not - is an LEO.
http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/...inton-to-leave
Hillary Clinton on Sunday left a 9/11 memorial ceremony in New York due to a "medical episode", a law enforcement source told Fox News.We simply can't take this officer's word since he spoke to Fox and not us. Furthermore, we haven't received our marching orders from the Hillary campaign... so please don't actually speak to us!
If this could result in Bernie
Biden to the rescue?
trump would anibilate average Joe
Here's the campaign ending video caught by a Czech tourist.
https://twitter.com/zgazda66/status/774993814025011200
RIP Zdenek Gazda
So how does this work with the replacement?
RIP as well, future Arkancide.
clinton has to much much ego to drop out but the current president could start indicment charges and then they could I believe replace her
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions