Reply With Quote
evita being anywhere close to top 200 player
Using analytical data and contexual facts..SI lists the top 100 players and five Spurs made the team.
Manu Ginonili - 98
Danny Green - 69
Obvioulsy Pau, Lamarcus and Kawhi will there.
I expect Pau to be in the 25-35 range. LAME around 12-16. Kawhi around 2-6
Some snubs..Derrick Rose, etc..Basically Some familar PGs with usage rate that doesnt refelct their current ability.
I expect to see Kawhi at four behind Lebron, Curry and KD. LMA would probably be 12, because he's like Kobe in that way. Pau should probably be between 30 and 40. Danny should be top-50, but his shooting fell off. Still, 69th is like being the ninth-best third-option in the league, and that's mad praise for someone who can't even collect a second-team All-Defense spot.
Good call. I do expect kawhi to go as high as 2 but will most likely be 4th or 5th Ben Goliver loves him or every analytic dude for that matter, your average casual fan probably has him at 5-6 considering the unreal and headscratching hype Westbrook is getting and there is Davis for your average casual. Remeber, this isnt a best player ranking..Just a prediction based on data from last year.
I think Aldridge can go as high as 10 but I expect him at 12 and as low as 16..There's a couple of guys from last year top 10 that is very questionable to make the top 10..Gasol wont make it and I imagine Griffin would make it but its a healthy question mark.
Honestly, would be interested to see where Parker would land if this was a top 200
Probably around the 115 range.
Porker stans.
Did Parker make the bottom 100 list?
Porker stans.
Top 150 player with a star level usage rate on per minute basis...Porker is reaching kobe like ego
I heard he made the top 10 compe ive eaters of the 2016-2017 season...
Parker probably leads in time of possession.
Maybe, it's time to take the Derrick Rose poster off the wall.
Amazing Gino made the cut this late in his career.... legend, tbh
BTW, he's ranked #97
Easily the 5th best spur tbh..even at age 39.
I've syrongly advoacted a Manu-Green-Leonaed-Aldridge- Center ( now pau) for these analytical reasons
Bellinelli >>>>>> manure
Kyle's dunk was classified the 62th best dunk of last season, that doesn't make him a dunker does it?
You know I am trolling, Spurstalk has me talking Kawhobe and all.. this is what you all get.
I don't think you understand. Kyle wasn't ranked 67th best dunker in the NBA. This dunk was ranked 67th by some middling broadcast.
Kyle's dunk was classified the 62th best dunk of last season, that doesn't make him a dunker does it?
You know I am trolling, Spurstalk has me talking Kawhobe and all.. this is what you all get.
It's a particular play, not for his total worth.
Your comparison is , and you should feel ashamed.
Manu was ranked top 100 by a top rated magazine. Manu's ONE PLAY was not top 100. See the difference?
Being classified a top 100 player is correctly classifying him as an efficient basketball player.
Top 100th dunk of the season doesn't not mean top dunker of the season.
he better stop dunking or Pop gonna bench him, tbh
Kyle's dunk was classified the 62th best dunk of last season, that doesn't make him a dunker does it?
You know I am trolling, Spurstalk has me talking Kawhobe and all.. this is what you all get.
Lol good point Nono.
Mr Anderson can dunk!!!!
Sports Illustrated came out with its list of Top 100 players for the 2017 season, and Tony Parker was among the more notable snubs.
Since there are only 30 teams in the NBA, this implies that Tony Parker isn't even a top 3 player anymore on a league-average team. This, despite Parker coming off a relative bounce back season the year before.
http://on.si.com/2cQ726m
Look a few threads down breh
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
