Oh for 's sake.![]()
![]()
El Nono posted one on the previous page -- short term memory loss?
Oh for 's sake.![]()
![]()
He did not provide a poll asking Americans what their top concern was with Clinton. He provided a poll that asked an open ended to question to only Clinton supporters that asked what their concerns were with their own candidate. So no, this does not satisfy my question to Reck.
http://www.people-press.org/2016/09/...mp/campaign_2/
You may want to look at the poll before ing your pants. When you come down from your premature ejaculation get back to finding the poll I asked for.
https://today.yougov.com/news/2015/07/30/poll-results-hillary-clinton/
How serious of a problem do you think it is that Hillary Clinton used a personal email address to conduct government business while working as Secretary of State?
Very serious . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35%
Somewhat serious . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25%
Not very serious . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16%
Not serious at all . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16%
Not sure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9%
Fail
Methodology
Survey conducted August 16-September 12, 2016
The American Trends Panel (ATP), created by the Pew Research Center, is a nationally representative panel of randomly selected U.S. adults living in households. Respondents who self-identify as internet users and who provided an email address participate in the panel via monthly self-administered Web surveys, and those who do not use the internet or decline to provide an email address participate via the mail. The panel is being managed by Abt SRBI.
The analysis in this report is based on 4,538 respondents, including 3,941 registered voters, who participated in the August 16-September 12, 2016 wave of the panel (4,195 by Web and 343 by mail). The margin of sampling error for the full sample of 4,538 respondents is plus or minus 2.4 percentage points and the margin of sampling error among registered voters is plus or minus 2.6 percentage points.
How you feeling now boss?
You are such a failure.
That is in line with what El posted. His link says about 29%. Yours says 35%. (I'm giving you the max)
That's in line with the sentiment of how people feel about the email server now.
That is a farcry to what you said. You said the majority of people are concerned.
Since when did 29 or 35 percent become a majority?
Come to dada.
Resorting to a july poll because he cant find relevant and fresh ones.![]()
I've bitten my tongue long enough. You are the stupidest ing poster in the political forum and you prove it day after day.
And while you support Clinton for President, what, if anything, concerns you about the candidate?
Open ended questions asked only of those who support/lean toward Clinton
How you feeling now you boss dip ?
This doesn't even show that their concerns are about emails or servers. In fact, it's not even mentioned.
Damn you are so dumb. And so easy.
Also adress all my other posts, genius.
Tell me how 30% is the new majority. Mr. July.![]()
You are on a roll with the self ownage tonight.
60% is and always has been a majority.
Just log off and start with a clean slate tomorrow. This is not going well for you.
I didn't post it to show that was their concern. It only asked Clinton supporters/leaners an open ended question what their concerns were. It did not ask all Americans therefore it does not satisfy my question of all American me feelings.
Log off dude, you are going full re .
And where are you getting 60 percent?
From your own cherry picked 3 month old poll?
You know you're done when you star proclaiming self victory when everything that you have posted have been throughly rebuked.![]()
35% very serious + 25% somewhat serious = 60% concerned dip
adding emojis after your stupidity isn't helping you one bit either
Kori Ellis give this man a dunce cap emoji under his username.
Are you this dense?
Your own graphic says "only 3% shown here."
And it goes on to say "see topline to see full set of responses."
Meaning, asshole, that while yes, those sets of questions only had either candidates supporters, it doesn't lump the rest of the correspondents.
And as I already showed in this thread, this was done nationally with RANDOMLY picked participants.
Further ing more. ElNono pointed out an specific statistic. The 29%. Which by the way doesn't appear on your little graph so what does that tell you?
Time to pull that trigger mein.
I dont think calling in backup is going to do you any good.
I didn't think it was possible but you did it again
![]()
This tells me you're given up the ghost.
What was that you said? Adding emojis doesn't help your stupidity.![]()
Look, I always thought Shillary is a crook. But what I think it's besides the point. I won't tell you to stop jacking off dreaming of Shillary sinking due to that Reddit post, the reality is that she won't due to that, IMO. That's my opinion.
I've said it before, but let me repeat it again, I don't think she can fall any deeper in the mistrust/crook department, so unless there's a youtube video of her throwing kittens off a cliff AND Trump doesn't manage to it up, I don't really see this affecting her much. She's really bottom of the barrel as it is.
It does, however, shows that when you don't ask specifically about email-gate, nobody really gives enough of a crap to bring it up.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)