Nobody in the DNC denied them. Assange has a 100% record for 10? years - it's vital to WikiLeaks.
You can't be serious. You think he has released everything the Russians have gotten for him?
Nobody in the DNC denied them. Assange has a 100% record for 10? years - it's vital to WikiLeaks.
I'm not saying it wasn't legit. I'm saying it didn't involved Hillary giving commands. It was just a bunch of people playing favorites.
We will just have to wait and see then.
I'll prepare your eulogy
Save it. You'll be eating your words.
If Shillary wins, the odds that he's going to get sniped in the embassy are way, way greater than a pardon, tbh...
Are you hinting that she might have something to do with getting rid of him?
I'm not a betting man, but it sounds like El Nono was laying odds.
That's essentially what happened with Obama, though there was little besides his black skin to justify it at the beginning. Conferring legitimacy on one faction and treating the other as if it were foreign to the polity even when it wins the election, bodes ill for political and social stability.
If the Dems don't win the Senate, expect impeachment to commence with a swiftness.
Funny how Congress has become a largely investigatory body ...merely another electoral weapon, as if there were nothing else power was good for, like serving the people, or fostering common good.
"Can we just drone the guy?"
Shillary at a security meeting in 2010.
She already decided on it
Odds of Marc Turi being suicided just went up
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/1...clinton-229115
Four years...
Thanks Republicans.
Their beef go way back. She was at State when he released all those diplomatic cables. Now this DNC stuff. Chelsea Manning was obviously made an example of. Too much bad blood...
Then you have some people that think he's a political prisoner and some people that think he's a rapist... there's really no consensus there that a pardon would be politically favorable for Shillary.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)