Then Kobe wastes the absolute zenith of his prime raping & staying free.
5 years of total loss because like Daddy---Kobe could not set aside childish things.
Then Kobe wastes the absolute zenith of his prime raping & staying free.
5 years of total loss because like Daddy---Kobe could not set aside childish things.
Return of the Sage
Considering he played through the Jordan and Duncan eras, he didn't fare too badly.
Truth, thread both ers and Phil were at fault ...
Only because Media prop(ed) him up. They'll tle & giggle about what Daddy left in the open so as not to offend, or, slay their cash cow, but, they will not hand up an indictment. No way. They'd like to go at Kobe, but, he ended up 5-4 over Shaq so that's impossible even for that vermin. & Kobe knows it.
lol snaq only won when the great centers of the 90s all retired, at the turn of the century he played against undersized bigs or pfs force to play center....yet he could only win 4 rings?
No question shaq underachieved. He could've been goat. He could've been at least Lebron. But he's now Hakeem Moses territory.
He could've had more than three years of total and absolute dominance. But his conditioning and ego got in the way.
He had to battle with cancer for several years and still won 3 straight. Considering that I'd say he did pretty well.
He underachieved only when you set sky high limit on him.
what was his h2h record against the great centers of the 90s-00, we can stop at year 2000 for comparison sakes since those great centers started to decline very fast, but thats a very good 10 years worth of h2h matches where all players at peaks overlapped with each other
you are talking to yourself now ?![]()
Kobe's parents were selling his .
And with an Olajuwon e, too. Also, the Kings were the real 02 champs. So, the league spotted him at least one.
Shaq would've absolutely dominated if he had developed some sort of shot. He never bothered to do that.
People don't get better than they need to be to win. Why should they?
^^ This.
They were selling your .
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)