So do you agree with Manny that a nuclear war is likely if Trump is POTUS? If so, what country would it likely be with if not Russia?
Hillary Clinton---40 I don't recalls
Cheryl Mills---189 I don't recalls
Bryan Pagliano---invoked 5th 125+ times
So do you agree with Manny that a nuclear war is likely if Trump is POTUS? If so, what country would it likely be with if not Russia?
Democrats have been using the nuclear war boogeyman for over 100 years. I can still remember the "Goldwater is for war, LBJ is for peace!" slogans. Look what that got us.
This is your case for Hillary - lol. These experts can't even tell me if this hurricane is gonna hit us tomorrow so I am forced to put up hurricane shutters on my rental, my mom's house, my mother-in-law's house and my house. If they can't tell me what's gonna happen tomorrow, why should I believe what they claim is gonna happen 30, 40, 50 years from now. Excuse me while I spend the next few hours of daylight putting up shutters.
It's really not. It's just fact.
Well, at least those are the plans if she becomes president.
I get the sense you're a climate change denier so I dont think anything that anyone says or does would change your mind.
Baby boomers with no kids are probably fine with checking off the fact climate change does exist and it is a thing with reassurance they won't suffer because they won't be around to see the disater. It's on the next generation's back.
i'll take corruption and evil over corruption and evil + socially backwards view on the world and people in general
a reasonable but not necessary inference. they're ty in different ways.
for me temperament and competence weigh more than character in this matchup. Trump can't control himself, is wildly inconsistent and has been a notably incompetent campaigner, even next to HRC, who ain't that great at it. don't get me wrong, I can't imagine voting for Hilary in any cir stance, but as to who's tier for president, it's Trump hands down.
how can Trump be expected to run the country if he can't even run his own campaign?
I'm not sure why corruption, secrecy, and questionable foreign policy decision-making are such deal breakers for the Party of Reagan, tbh.
there are plenty of things wrong with HRC. all of the things you just mentioned.
unfortunately for the GOP, Trump doesn't foreseeably improve on most of HRC's faults and in fact, could be a lot worse.
More likely as opposed to the alternative? You betcha. A whole lot of the national security types agree with me.
The southern democrats migrated since then but okay.
Meteorology is not perfect therefor we cannot predict climate change? gmfb.
If Barry can order pretty much anyone in the government around like a king, what's taking him so long to force the IRS to wrap up their audit on Trump so he wont have any more excuses for refusing to release his tax returns?
Maybe Trump hires good enough tax lawyers and accountants to drag it out?
Of course. Great take as always rmt.
IRS too busy helping Clinton Foundation clean this up.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/04/politi...ues/index.html
Do you always have to connect everything back to the Clinton's? You're such a re bro.
The same "national security types" you hated during the Bush era? The ones who led us into an unwinnable oil war in Iraq under false pretenses? Wow, what a ringing endorsement for Hillary.
All the more reason to tell them to wrap up the audit. They can redirect resources. Just give him a pass and leak it to the media the audit is complete.
This is up for negotiation if you listen to Trump.
He says he would release his taxes if Hillary releases her 33k lost emails.
Wait..if you're not releasing your taxes because you're being audited, then why would you say you would if Hillary did this or that?
The audit as we've all known all along is an excuse. He could have release them any time he wanted. But obviously he won't under no circustance because the gig would be up and he would lose.
You are in a thread discussing Hillary Clinton bro. Her name is in the le of the thread for s sake.
Better get in as many posts as you can, your days here are numbered. The ELE bet looms.
I understand that. I'm just wondering why it's taking king Obama so long to take away Trump's excuse and order the IRS to get in ing line like he did with the DOJ and the FBI!
I'm shaking in my boots.
NOT.
This might be the stupidest, most ignorant and fact-free post of the year on this forum sincedon't teach my son climate change in science class
(also stated by this re )
Jesus , this woman...
"they" in this scenario is some 2-bit weather-bunny in Miami who got her job because she's got a nice rack, and also a consortium of PhDs who study historical trends in climate and weather patterns.
ing moran.
I hope you live in a flood zone and your house gets permanantly wiped off the map to teach you a lesson that denying science is fatal. You deserve a Hurricance Matthew double-tap
Last edited by Splits; 10-05-2016 at 08:58 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)