Farewell Reck. ELE bet settled.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Wikileaks Clinton Wall St. speeches seal the deal. I'll miss my punching bag. Kill your account.

[TheGreatYacht]

Didn't shake hands = didn't count

Thought you knew this

[TheSanityAnnex]

Reck are you a man of your word or a cowardly liar?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7243#

kill your account

[Reck]

Reck are you a man of your word or a cowardly liar?

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/7243#

kill your account

Are you stupid or something?

This is from John Podesta and there is nothing in there that is grabbing. It's an email between two people.

What don't you understand about direct?

Assange has to have imformation partaining to Hillary..from Hillary.

[Reck]

Also, who the starts an email chain by saying "I agree but?"

This was clearly a cut and paste job. No one starts an email in mid sentence.

Try again, resident re .

[TheSanityAnnex]

Are you stupid or something?

This is from John Podesta and there is nothing in there that is grabbing. It's an email between two people.

What don't you understand about direct?

Assange has to have imformation partaining to Hillary..from Hillary.

you are a coward and a liar. Pathetic piece of you are lying so you can continue posting on a message board.

You were told by others not to take the bet and you didn't listen. Now you're flailing around trying to change the terms of the bet. What a pussy you are.

[hater]

Wreck

Another class A welcher

[TheSanityAnnex]

Also, who the starts an email chain by saying "I agree but?"

This was clearly a cut and paste job. No one starts an email in mid sentence.

Try again, resident re .

you are so ing re ed

the email chain doesn't start at the top you idiot. That is Hillary responding to Podesta's comment below.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Also, who the starts an email chain by saying "I agree but?"

This was clearly a cut and paste job. No one starts an email in mid sentence.

Try again, resident re .

there are even time stamps to help you peabrain

[Reck]

you are a coward and a liar. Pathetic piece of you are lying so you can continue posting on a message board.

You were told by others not to take the bet and you didn't listen. Now you're flailing around trying to change the terms of the bet. What a pussy you are.

Do you want me to quote the main post again?

If you are so sure he has nothing more directly on Hillary I propose an ELE bet. If Assange does, you are gone from the site. If Assange doesn't, I'm gone from this site. We got a deal?

So, where is the direct information?

This piece of you tried to pass as direct is not only not direct, it is taken out of context and not even started by Hillary. This chain of emails were from John Podesta.

Also, I'm still waiting for answers on post #5.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Do you want me to quote the main post again?



So, where is the direct information?

This piece of you tried to pass as direct is not only not direct, it is taken out of context and not even started by Hillary. This chain of emails were from John Podesta.

Also, I'm still waiting for answers on post #5.

You are too ing stupid. Emails between Clinton and Podesta is nothing directly on Hillary? does Assange need to release emails of Hillary emailing herself?

Continue being a liar and continue posting here, it actually provides great entertainment.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Also, I'm still waiting for answers on post #5.

[TheSanityAnnex]

answered in post #8

[Reck]

You are too ing stupid. Emails between Clinton and Podesta is nothing directly on Hillary? does Assange need to release emails of Hillary emailing herself?

Continue being a liar and continue posting here, it actually provides great entertainment.

Then why was this gotten through hacking Podesta, I wonder?

Or did you not catch the hacked email le in your own link? "Podesta-e-mails."

[TheSanityAnnex]

Then why was this gotten through hacking Podesta, I wonder?

Or did you not catch the hacked email le in your own link? "Podesta-e-mails."

It doesn't matter where the stuff came from. You said Assange had nothing more on Hillary, well he did. And I'm sure there is more. You lost the bet. you are a pussy a liar and a coward, with an extra helping of stupid.

Also, who the starts an email chain by saying "I agree but?"

[Reck]

It doesn't matter where the stuff came from. You said Assange had nothing more on Hillary, well he did. And I'm sure there is more. You lost the bet. you are a pussy a liar and a coward, with an extra helping of stupid.

Also, who the starts an email chain by saying "I agree but?"

It matters because that was the basis of the ing bet. I like how you dropped the "directly" on Hillary.

Was this hacked from Hillary? No

Was this obtained from someone other than the person in question? Absolutely.

And ultimately, this is a generic email that shows literally nothing.

[Chris]

[FuzzyLumpkins]

TSA fails again.

[TheSanityAnnex]

TSA fails again.

This should be fun...how so?

[TheSanityAnnex]

It matters because that was the basis of the ing bet. I like how you dropped the "directly" on Hillary.

Was this hacked from Hillary? No

Was this obtained from someone other than the person in question? Absolutely.

And ultimately, this is a generic email that shows literally nothing.

Here is an example of how stupid you are, you quoted and even bolded it to emphasize your stupidity.



" Originally Posted by TheSanityAnnex
If you are so sure he has nothing more directly on Hillary I propose an ELE bet. If Assange does, you are gone from the site. If Assange doesn't, I'm gone from this site. We got a deal?"

The bet was Assange has more on Hillary. It didn't matter where it came from, you clearly agreed to that even when others told you it was a losing proposition. Shocker.

You are the stupidest person I've interacted with on the web, it's not even close. You just demonstrated you can't/didn't read time stamps and even asked a second time for clarification on an email chain your stupid ass couldn't put together on your own.

You're just dumb dude. Own it.

Its obvious to all you are welching, not surprising but ill drop it and just refer to you as such.

[Reck]

Here is an example of how stupid you are, you quoted and even bolded it to emphasize your stupidity.



" Originally Posted by TheSanityAnnex
If you are so sure he has nothing more directly on Hillary I propose an ELE bet. If Assange does, you are gone from the site. If Assange doesn't, I'm gone from this site. We got a deal?"

The bet was Assange has more on Hillary. It didn't matter where it came from, you clearly agreed to that even when others told you it was a losing proposition. Shocker.

You are the stupidest person I've interacted with on the web, it's not even close. You just demonstrated you can't/didn't read time stamps and even asked a second time for clarification on an email chain your stupid ass couldn't put together on your own.

You're just dumb dude. Own it.

Its obvious to all you are welching, not surprising but ill drop it and just refer to you as such.

You lack self awareness and its rich you calling other people stupid when your entire existence here is devoted to extreme conspiracy theories that makes cosmored look sane in comparison.

And as far as the bet goes, nothing's change. It is still on.

Nothing about what you have posted is coming directly from Hillary, its second hand bull . For one.

2, I made clear the terms of the bet. Go back and re-read the terms before you start making premature threads ing all over the place.

And finally, you don't expect something as mundane and boring as talking points be the thing that gets me off this board, do you?

We agreed it had to be bombs like information or damaging information directly linking Hillary herself.

I'm fairly confident. This guy has nothing more on Hillary.

And let's be clear. There needs to be do ents about Hillary doing such and such. Not some indirectly bull like the DNC hack.

I will honor your bet when that happens.

[TheSanityAnnex]

You lack self awareness and its rich you calling other people stupid when your entire existence here is devoted to extreme conspiracy theories that makes cosmored look sane in comparison.

And as far as the bet goes, nothing's change. It is still on.

Nothing about what you have posted is coming directly from Hillary, its second hand bull . For one.

2, I made clear the terms of the bet. Go back and re-read the terms before you start making premature threads ing all over the place.

And finally, you don't expect something as mundane and boring as talking points be the thing that gets me off this board, do you?

We agreed it had to be bombs like information or damaging information directly linking Hillary herself.



I will honor your bet when that happens.

You keep moving the goalposts and trying to change the terms. Never did you say it had to be a bombs .

I'm fairly confident. This guy has nothing more on Hillary.


And let's be clear. There needs to be do ents about Hillary doing such and such. Not some indirectly bull like the DNC hack.

Assange released an email between Hillary Clinton and John Podesta discussing classified material. You lost, you welched.

[CosmicCowboy]

Give it up, TSA. No matter what comes out the puta will keep moving the goal post.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Half the fun is watching him step on his own .

[RandomGuy]

Are you stupid or something?

This is from John Podesta and there is nothing in there that is grabbing. It's an email between two people.

What don't you understand about direct?

Assange has to have imformation partaining to Hillary..from Hillary.

TheSanityAnnex has a very low bar when it comes to either evidence or interpretations of evidence.

He rushes in with what he is CONVINCED is some childish "gotcha" because he is a slave to his own confirmation bias. Not alone among partisan hacks of both side.