Results 1 to 17 of 17
  1. #1
    Veteran InRareForm's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    8,644

  2. #2
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    so the ethanol is "widely used" as fuel, producing CO2, brilliant!

  3. #3
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,134
    Make a great eco-still for getting a buzz. Eco-Shine? Sunshine instead of moonshine?

  4. #4
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    Click the links and get to the original paper. Then read the last sentence of the conclusion

  5. #5
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    39,469
    so the ethanol is "widely used" as fuel, producing CO2, brilliant!

    Another example of people who don't understand science giving a very deceiving header to an article. The important part is the novel use of catalysts, not turning CO2 to ethanol. But most people don't find the catalyst part newsworthy for the public so... embellish.

    Its somewhat like your misunderstanding of GMOs all being harmful while probably having personally taken an antibiotic produced by a GMO.

  6. #6
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,134
    Still, a super pure ethanol could be a hangover free buzz. Look how much people will pay for Vodka that has been filtered multiple times.

  7. #7
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Another example of people who don't understand science giving a very deceiving header to an article. The important part is the novel use of catalysts, not turning CO2 to ethanol. But most people don't find the catalyst part newsworthy for the public so... embellish.

    Its somewhat like your misunderstanding of GMOs all being harmful while probably having personally taken an antibiotic produced by a GMO.
    Golden rice? still ain't not achieving its objectives, and it probably never will.

    GMO plants, foods may not be the problem (verdict not reached), but the Ms of tons BigChem poisons poured on them IS THE PROBLEM, along with enslaving farmers world-wide to BigChem, killing their self-sufficiency, independence.

  8. #8
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    I'm not impressed with the volume rate. The coulombic efficiency is great, but how do you scale such a thing up to be useful?

  9. #9
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,134
    o's is like $40 for 1.75 liters.

  10. #10
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    o's is like $40 for 1.75 liters.
    This process would likely cost $40,000,000 just to produce that much an hour.

  11. #11
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    39,469
    Golden rice? still ain't not achieving its objectives, and it probably never will.

    GMO plants, foods may not be the problem (verdict not reached), but the Ms of tons BigChem poisons poured on them IS THE PROBLEM, along with enslaving farmers world-wide to BigChem, killing their self-sufficiency, independence.
    What poison was poured on the GMO bacteria that produce antibiotics for humans?

    You Lump in one giant category.
    And so you want to trash golden rice? It's a dead end? This is not how science works.

  12. #12
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    39,469
    This process would likely cost $40,000,000 just to produce that much an hour.
    Jesus H. Christ this is NOT what it's about.

    It's just about the fact they could get the stated atoms to catalyze a rxn at room temp.

  13. #13
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Jesus H. Christ this is NOT what it's about.

    It's just about the fact they could get the stated atoms to catalyze a rxn at room temp.
    I know. I was joking at the cost for ethanol, vs. the $40 bottle.

    I'm just disappointing its so small scale. I wonder how expensive it would be to be useful.

  14. #14
    my unders, my frgn whites pgardn's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Post Count
    39,469
    I know. I was joking at the cost for ethanol, vs. the $40 bottle.

    I'm just disappointing its so small scale. I wonder how expensive it would be to be useful.
    Bottling before denaturing could be cool for the whole lab.

    Party on.

  15. #15
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    I know. I was joking at the cost for ethanol, vs. the $40 bottle.

    I'm just disappointing its so small scale. I wonder how expensive it would be to be useful.
    Of course you do..then goes on to illustrate he hasn't the foggiest...







    coloumbic efficiency....





  16. #16
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    coloumbic efficiency....




    Hey, that is real. Generally applied to batteries, but indicts how much energy is stored in the process.

    http://www.openelectrical.org/wiki/i...bic_Efficiency

  17. #17
    Got Woke? DMC's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    90,829
    ^


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •