Reply With Quote
You said that about the previous video and every email dump so far. Pretty sure you also thought his PP video was damning. I'll wait.
Or maybe it's not trending in the US but it's trending outside of the US.
Just read Google is actively suppressing both videos. Doesn't show up as trending in the US. Login with VPN from outside US and yesterday's video is trending at #3.
You said that about the previous video and every email dump so far. Pretty sure you also thought his PP video was damning. I'll wait.
Or maybe it's not trending in the US but it's trending outside of the US.
Hopefully Glenn Greenwald watches it and can break it down for you.
In the meantime: "Americans United for Change has always operated according to the highest ethical standards," said Brad Woodhouse, President of Americans United For Change. "Scott Foval is no longer associated with Americans United for Change."
no, actively being suppressed.
No vetting needed. O'keefe plant and Foval guy hatch a theoretical voter fraud scheme in a bar, O'Keefe plant takes the scheme to Bob Creamer who says he won't touch that with a 10 foot pole but he gives the O'keefe plant the names of some hispanic activist's that he could talk to, O'Keefe plant then pitches the scheme to the Hispanic activist and he says yeah that is something we could think about for 2018 if Trump wins.
First video was more damning imo. This one is pretty meh.
You miss the part where Foval said they've been bussing in voters for 30 years?
That's a guy talking in a bar.
Did someone post this earlier? NYC Democratic Election Commissioner, "They Bus People Around to Vote"
wtf?
What does a burka have to do with anything? So if I were to wear a giant Sombrero in NY I could get a voter ID?
What is this?
https://publicinterestlegal.org/file...-Complaint.pdf
October 18, 2016
Office of the General Counsel
Federal Election Commission
999 E Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20463
Re: Complaint Against Hillary for America, the Democratic National
Committee, Democracy Partners, Americans United for Change, and other
known and unknown individuals and groups.
To Whom It May Concern:
Complainant
The Public Interest Legal Foundation (“PILF”) is a non-profit educational and legal foundation
dedicated to protect the right to vote, preserve the Cons utional framework of American
elections, and educate the public on the issue of election integrity. As part of its mission, PILF
gathers and analyzes information regarding potential violations of federal and state election laws
and informs the public about these violations and concerns.
This complaint is filed on behalf of the Public Interest Legal Foundation by Joseph A.
Vanderhulst, Legal Counsel with PILF at 209 West Main Street, Plainfield, Indiana 46168,
pursuant to 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(1).
Respondents
Hillary for America
(Committee ID C00575795)
P.O. Box 5256
New York, NY 10185-5256
Jose H. Villarreal
Treasurer, Hillary for America
P.O. Box 5256
New York, NY 10185-5256
Democratic National Committee
430 South Capitol Street Southeast
Washington, DC 20003
Democracy Partners
1250 Eye Street, NW, Ste. 250
Washington, DC 20005
Bob Creamer
Strategist, Democracy Partners
1250 Eye Street, NW, Ste. 250
Washington, DC 20005
Americans United for Change
P.O. Box 34606
Washington, D.C. 20043
202-470-6954
Scott Foval
National Field Director, Americans United for Change
P.O. Box 34606
Washington, D.C. 20043
202-470-6954
Voces de la Frontera Action
1027 S. 5th Street
Milwaukee, WI 53204
Tel. 414-643-1620
Unknown Groups and Individuals Associated with Respondents
Summary
This complaint is based on information and belief that respondents have engaged in public
communications, campaign activity, targeted voter registration drives, and other targeted GOTV
activity under 11 C.F.R. 100.26 and 11 C.F.R. 114.4 at the request, direction, and approval of the
Hillary for America campaign committee and the Democratic National Committee in violation of
11 C.F.R. 109.20 and 11 C.F.R. 114.4(d)(2) and (3).
Complainant’s information and belief is based on findings from an investigation conducted by
Project Veritas Action and their published reports regarding the same, as well as on news
sources.
“If the Commission, upon receiving a complaint . . . has reason to believe that a person has
committed, or is about to commit, a violation of [the FECA] . . . [t]he Commission shall make an
investigation of such alleged violation . . . .” 52 U.S.C. § 30109(a)(2); see also 11 C.F.R. §
111.4(a).
Facts and Violations
Alien Registration Drives
On information and belief based on published reports and findings from an investigation by
Project Veritas Action, several groups including Americans United for Change and Voces de la
Frontera Action and other unknown groups have engaged in voter registration drives and other
GOTV activity during the 2016 election cycle. These activities potentially registered persons
who were not citizens. This activity is regulated under 11 C.F.R. 114.4.
On the same information and belief, these voter registration drives and other GOTV activity
were coordinated with DNC and HFA by express communication through agents of Democracy
Partners and The Foval Group. These communications resulted in coordination of voter
registration activity in violation of 11 C.F.R. 114.4(c)(2) and (d)(2)-(4) by all parties involved.
Also, because they were coordinated with a political party or campaign, there voter registration
activities deliberated targeted demographic groups because they were statistically more likely to
support a particular party or candidate in violation of 11 C.F.R. 114.4(c)(2) and (d)(2)-(4) by all
parties involved.
Paid Protesters
As reported in several news sources, disruptions, including incidents of violence, have occurred
at rallies held by the Trump for President campaign. Based on published reports, these
disruptions were instigated by paid professional protestors arranged by third party groups at the
coordination and direction of agents of Democracy Partners and The Foval Group at the request
and approval of agents of DNC and HFA.
On information and belief based on published reports and findings from an investigation by
Project Veritas Action, these disruptions include the payment of protesters “wherever Trump and
Pence are going to be.” Based on these reports, it appears that all violent disruptions at Trump
for President campaign rallies have been executed by paid protesters trained and instructed in
their speech and conduct to advocate against Trump and in support of Clinton.
On information and belief based on the same source, agents of DNC and HFA communicated
with the third party groups and individuals engaging in the activity and content through agents of
Democracy Partners and The Foval Group in order to request and approve the communications.
Through a direct chain of communication, this cons uted coordination under 11 C.F.R.
109.21(d)(1)-(5).
Other Public Communications and Campaign Activities
On information and belief based on published reports, all public communications as defined in
11 C.F.R. 109.21(c) done by Americans United for Change, including the activities described in
Exhibit A, were done at or with the direction, approval, suggestion, or after material discussion
regarding the timing, content, and audience of the communications, of the DNC and Hillary for
America campaign.
Conclusion
Upon information and belief, and based upon the facts set forth above, Respondents Hillary for
America, the Democratic National Committee, Democracy Partners, Americans United for
Change, and their agents, named and unnamed above, have, each of them, individually and
collectively, violated the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, and must be held
accountable and liable for their unlawful actions.
On behalf of PILF, I hereby request an investigation into whether the respondents identified
above, or any other related parties, have violated federal campaign finance laws. The information
uncovered by this investigation, including this initial complaint, will be used by PILF to educate
the American people about the laws governing our elections and current and potential threats to
election integrity.
Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Please contact me if you have further
questions.
Respectfully submitted,
PUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION
Joseph A. Vanderhulst
Legal Counsel
I hereby affirm and state under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Joseph A. Vanderhulst
Subscribed and sworn to me on this day of , 2016, by Joseph A.
Vanderhulst, President and General Counsel of Public Interest Legal Foundation.
Notary Public
potentially?
can't believe i read that just for potentially.
thanks
did you say? I cvnt hear you.
Trending #1 on Youtube.
https://www.google.com/trends/explore?q=james%20okeefe
Second head rolled
Bob Creamer done with the DNC
https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/s...84460652167168
Well, yeah, he discussed work secrets with a stranger at a bar. What an idiot.
Where did you get that from your link? I don't think you understand how Google Trends works.
Here is a Google Trends link comparing James Okeefe with "Cat Videos". Enjoy.
https://www.google.com/trends/explor...e,cat%20videos
I just went to YouTube. In America. Here's what my "Recommended Videos" screen looks like.
Here's what "Trending" looks like:
suppression
I already said it was trending #1 on YouTube. But thanks for the screen cap.I just went to YouTube. In America. Here's what my "Recommended Videos" screen looks like.
Here's what "Trending" looks like:
"Work secrets" lol
So then you're no longer saying it was repressed.
What was the Google Trends link supposed to show us?
it was a conspiracy until TSA exposed it on ST political forum and then they removed the suppression algorithm
The polls however are not showing that, but Ablin noted that the polls and betting forums are not perfect. "I will say for the Brexit vote, the betting sites had 85 percent chance of Britain remaining before Brexit. But who knows," he said. The U.K. voted by a slim majority to leave the European Union by a slim margin.
yeah, that 2nd video nowhere near as the 1st one.
Which was naut times naut equals double naut
Funny CNN pounced on that, nothing at Fox. I guess they are weary, probably jumped all over the ACORN deal before it went south.
key operative in a Democratic scheme to send agitators to cause unrest at Donald Trump’s rallies has visited the White House 342 times since 2009, White House records show.
Robert Creamer, who acted as a middle man between the Clinton campaign, the Democratic National Committee and “protesters” who tried — and succeeded — to provoke violence at Trump rallies met with President Obama 47 times, according to White House records. Creamer’s last visit was in June 2016.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2016/10/18/ex...#ixzz4NXEVB5k0
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
