Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 40 of 40
  1. #26
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    2,584
    The more i see the SL the more i think Simmons is the better fit in there, even better than Green maybe.
    If he shows he can hold his own on defense that would be great. For sure he will be more useful than Anderson out there.

  2. #27
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Post Count
    1,140
    Exactly, this is not the fangirl talking. In that lineup you need the blue collar things and heady play. We were chatting about how adding an offensive player like Durant to a lineup that already has great offense in the GSW didn't help them be better necessarily, specially when the guy you took out did a lot of blue collar things and didn't need the ball or took possessions from anyone. Kyle taking shots in that group is unnecessary, unless he's wide open and is passed to for a good shot.

    That lineup is all about Kawhi with LMA, their PnR and 2 man game. Then you have two other players in there who need the ball and shots to feel "important" as Manu says, and whose value is tied to the offensive production.

    Kyle doesn't need shots to help them. He only needs to take a wide open 3 if he has it, that is it. I think the defense and everything else was emphasized to him and he's truly doing what Pop wants in there. Ppl should just appreciate that he can help the team without needing shots or the ball. He can do other things offensively, and we saw them in some games last season, but they are not called for, nor needed in that lineup.

    When Danny gets back, he will stretch the floor better, but Danny's value to that lineup is also the floor stretching and the same blue collar things, not needing the ball or shots to help them. That is basically what Kyle is providing. They could set him up for some open 3s if they want to establish him as a shooter. I think in the 2nd Q they tried to do that, and the play was sniffed out and he was closed out in his shot, making him take a one dribble pull up, but as they get more chemistry and such I think he will end up with some open shots. Some times Kawhi drove into traffic when Kyle was open for a corner 3 and he could have passed too, but Kawhi was drawing fouls, and was ultra aggressive, etc. Again, we saw the guys execute what Pop wanted. If he wasn't doing what Pop wanted, he would not be playing. That is why I said, that lineup is entirely about Kawhi's development as a PnR ballhandler and dominant player. Kyle is just playing a small supporting role.
    troll post

  3. #28
    Spurs fan in Las Vegas Drom John's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    3,686
    That's often been true, but it hasn't in the case of Anderson. He started in place of Kawhi, TD and possibly even LMA last season. All that was while he remained the second-string SF. Right now the bench is so fluid that Pop's probably not going to worry about who has a fixed role or not.
    Anderson started 11 games last year. 10 games were for Leonard, 1 game was for Duncan. There's a Thunder game (blowout Thunder win) with Leonard and Aldridge, but I believe Anderson mostly guarded Durant and Diaw mostly guarded Ibaka. Anderson had the best +/- for the starters, and Durant had the worst.

  4. #29
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    Anderson started 11 games last year. 10 games were for Leonard, 1 game was for Duncan. There's a Thunder game (blowout Thunder win) with Leonard and Aldridge, but I believe Anderson mostly guarded Durant and Diaw mostly guarded Ibaka. Anderson had the best +/- for the starters, and Durant had the worst.
    Thanks, Drom. Insightful as always. I don't think we can read anything into Pop's thinking given that Anderson is starting. He may just want Kawhi to get minutes at the two. Or he could want to see if Anderson has what it takes to be a future starter. Or maybe he thinks Simmons is a better bench option due to his energy and athleticism. We don't know.

  5. #30
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    The more i see the SL the more i think Simmons is the better fit in there, even better than Green maybe.
    If he shows he can hold his own on defense that would be great. For sure he will be more useful than Anderson out there.
    If Simmons shows he can do what Green can do, then I agree there's a good chance. But he hasn't, really. His man defense is still feast or famine. And while he's been shooting great from deep, we'll have to see. Danny has a much higher floor, since you know he can defend elite perimeter guys to give Kawhi a small, and Simmons probably can't inspire that confidence. And even if he's not as big of a threat to score from any given place on the court, Danny's three-point shooting so well established that he can space the floor as well as any role-player in the league. Simmons is like 70 percent of Danny who can flash at 120 percent of him. But Green has his own flashes, and when he's on, he looks like a Splash Bro who's also a DPoY candidate.

  6. #31
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    With Kawhi being so much more of the initiator of offense, and with the passing ability of Pau, there seems to be less of a need for a ball-handling, playmaking PG (not that parker has been very good at the latter in recent years). In recent years, I was hesitant to suggest starting Patty because he seemed to be more of a shooting guard on offense with Manu being the bench point guard, same situation as with Gary Neal back in the day. But with the lack of a need for a "true" point guard on offense, I don't think it's a farfetched idea anymore... especially if Simmons and Manu are able to work together off the bench as ball-handlers.

  7. #32
    Hope springs eternal. SAGirl's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    27,774
    If Simmons shows he can do what Green can do, then I agree there's a good chance. But he hasn't, really. His man defense is still feast or famine. And while he's been shooting great from deep, we'll have to see. Danny has a much higher floor, since you know he can defend elite perimeter guys to give Kawhi a small, and Simmons probably can't inspire that confidence. And even if he's not as big of a threat to score from any given place on the court, Danny's three-point shooting so well established that he can space the floor as well as any role-player in the league. Simmons is like 70 percent of Danny who can flash at 120 percent of him. But Green has his own flashes, and when he's on, he looks like a Splash Bro who's also a DPoY candidate.
    I think the issue with Danny is that he's perfect for what they need. The reality is that the need Green's floor spacing and blue collar mentality more than anything else. Danny plays hard and competes without having offensive touches. If you want him to get a rhyhtm you better get him some good shots, but he can play over 20 minutes easily of a very compe ive game and only come out with 2 shots and yet have impacted the game positively. With Kawhi in this ball dominant offensive fashion, and then Tony and Pau there, the 5th guy can't be a guy that needs touches.

    In fact, Tony and Pau are looking very weird in fit next to Kawhi and LMA just by virtue of the fact that they require involvement with the ball in specific and particular situations. Danny doesn't... Kyle doesn't either. Where he's failing is that he's not the shooter that Danny is, and again, I hope he snaps out of that funk. He's not going to be Danny but he can shoot when open. He didn't get many open shot opportunities here... but he can't pass up shots if he wants to inspire confidence in teammates. No escaping that.

  8. #33
    Klaw apalisoc_9's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    24,488
    With Kawhi being so much more of the initiator of offense, and with the passing ability of Pau, there seems to be less of a need for a ball-handling, playmaking PG (not that parker has been very good at the latter in recent years). In recent years, I was hesitant to suggest starting Patty because he seemed to be more of a shooting guard on offense with Manu being the bench point guard, same situation as with Gary Neal back in the day. But with the lack of a need for a "true" point guard on offense, I don't think it's a farfetched idea anymore... especially if Simmons and Manu are able to work together off the bench as ball-handlers.
    Parker should start. It's just about Patty getting more minutes and sotuationally ending games. I'd like to see Patty play 14 minutes of the available 24 every half.

  9. #34
    Savvy Veteran spurraider21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    100,825
    Parker should start. It's just about Patty getting more minutes and sotuationally ending games. I'd like to see Patty play 14 minutes of the available 24 every half.
    i mean with Pau being able to step out and hit 3's as opposed to Duncan's broken jumper last year, there is more spacing for parker... so there's that. I'd like to have some games where Pop is willing to play mad scientist and experiment longer minutes for Laprovittola or even Murray to see how they might fare also

  10. #35
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    I think the issue with Danny is that he's perfect for what they need. The reality is that the need Green's floor spacing and blue collar mentality more than anything else. Danny plays hard and competes without having offensive touches. If you want him to get a rhyhtm you better get him some good shots, but he can play over 20 minutes easily of a very compe ive game and only come out with 2 shots and yet have impacted the game positively. With Kawhi in this ball dominant offensive fashion, and then Tony and Pau there, the 5th guy can't be a guy that needs touches.

    In fact, Tony and Pau are looking very weird in fit next to Kawhi and LMA just by virtue of the fact that they require involvement with the ball in specific and particular situations. Danny doesn't... Kyle doesn't either. Where he's failing is that he's not the shooter that Danny is, and again, I hope he snaps out of that funk. He's not going to be Danny but he can shoot when open. He didn't get many open shot opportunities here... but he can't pass up shots if he wants to inspire confidence in teammates. No escaping that.
    I do agree that Danny's strengths are best ones to have for his role. And that's why Simmons being better at other things doesn't make up the difference. So if Jonathon could actually show elite three-and-D skills, then his slashing and finishing would be things to put him over the top. I will say, though, that his slashing does actually work out for the bench now that Manu is deferring to him. Ginobili had taken the role of a spot-up shooter on many plays, and that's really good for the offense. It also makes the sets ambidextrous, because you can have Simmons spot up while Manu drives.

    For Anderson, last night was the first time this season where I think he played a good game as a role-player. He had some good games in the preseason, but those were with him in a leading role. That he was a tenacious rebounder and made smart defensive plays despite being out of his comfort zone was encouraging, since it makes him more versatile. Now, he needs to keep working on that (sort of like Simmons working on "being solid") while also making sure he's confident enough to step up when he needs to. I'm disappointed, not really with him in general but with him compared to what he should be now. While I do believe he's a good player even considering his unachieved potential, the quartet of Mills, Manu and two of Dedmon, Lee and Bertans may well be better with an aggressive Simmons than a passive Anderson. Dude's going to have to outcompete those guys.

  11. #36
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    42,293
    Simmons doesn't make sense in the starting lineup IMO..his #1 strength is pushing the ball in transition, and his halfcourt game is developing into a Lance Stephenson-type..if he sticks with the bench unit and continues to progress, he'll have a role where he's only behind Manu in usage, and the faster pace of the bench allows him to push the ball in transition more often, too..he's a perfect fit for the hectic nature of the 2nd unit..

    If he's in the starting lineup, he would just become a spot-up shooter that wouldn't have nearly as many opportunities to display his aggression IMO..Spurs already have Kawhi/Aldridge that need to eat, Gasol is going to need an increased role as he feels more comfortable, and Parker is what he is(needs the ball to be effective, virtually useless without the ball)..

    As for Simmons vs. Kyle, I expect it will play out similarly to last season, a lot of fluctuation..

  12. #37
    Hope springs eternal. SAGirl's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    27,774
    I do agree that Danny's strengths are best ones to have for his role. And that's why Simmons being better at other things doesn't make up the difference. So if Jonathon could actually show elite three-and-D skills, then his slashing and finishing would be things to put him over the top. I will say, though, that his slashing does actually work out for the bench now that Manu is deferring to him. Ginobili had taken the role of a spot-up shooter on many plays, and that's really good for the offense. It also makes the sets ambidextrous, because you can have Simmons spot up while Manu drives.

    For Anderson, last night was the first time this season where I think he played a good game as a role-player. He had some good games in the preseason, but those were with him in a leading role. That he was a tenacious rebounder and made smart defensive plays despite being out of his comfort zone was encouraging, since it makes him more versatile. Now, he needs to keep working on that (sort of like Simmons working on "being solid") while also making sure he's confident enough to step up when he needs to. I'm disappointed, not really with him in general but with him compared to what he should be now. While I do believe he's a good player even considering his unachieved potential, the quartet of Mills, Manu and two of Dedmon, Lee and Bertans may well be better with an aggressive Simmons than a passive Anderson. Dude's going to have to outcompete those guys.
    That last aspect could set up a trade opportunity in the future, but it will not happen now bc Manu is 39 years old and you can't send Kyle away when you need wing depth due to that (and when Bertans has a delicate injury history too, it's risky to assume health for guys, or that rookies will not hit a rookie wall like Simmons did last season.) Then next season Manu is likely retiring so that complicates a possible Anderson trade even more, so Pop will find opportunities to develop him like he found those for CoJo. It is early to judge him, he had a slow start last season too, and then loosened up. He's playing a role subbing for a SG, that Pop never said he envisioned for him long term (notoriously said he's either 1, 3 or 4)... while wings are interchangeable, he doesn't have the SG's mentality, probably what inspired Pop's comment. Anyways, I do believe he will be better than he's shown, but it is critical for him that he shoots the 3 more willingly.

  13. #38
    Big in Japan GSH's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    14,093
    I don't think there's any dilemma, if you're thinking about playoff time, instead of regular season. Danny is the starter, period, and Pop will ride him in the playoffs. Kyle isn't athletic like Simmons, but he plays smarter. And he has been in the system long enough for Pop to give him regular playoff minutes this time around. Simmons is a spark plug. Unless he develops more consistency, he will get spot minutes in the playoffs. Not saying that Simmons can't/won't do that, but as of right now, that's pretty much how it stands, IMO.

    Through the regular season? , Pop can do nearly anything, on any given night. It's nothing unusual for him to leave guys on the bench that have been playing very well. Trying to predict what Pop is going to do before the All Star break is just entertainment. You'll think you have it figured out, and then he'll throw a wrench into it. People will start saying, "this guy's in Pop's doghouse".

    The bigger question, to me, is whether Bertans will be able to earn playoff minutes by the time they roll around. Most of us think he's got that potential, and that could make some issues in the Anderson/Simmons situation. But he's still a first-year Spur, and he will have to show a lot of savvy for Pop to favor him over Kyle in the playoffs, IMO.

  14. #39
    Hope springs eternal. SAGirl's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    27,774
    I don't think there's any dilemma, if you're thinking about playoff time, instead of regular season. Danny is the starter, period, and Pop will ride him in the playoffs. Kyle isn't athletic like Simmons, but he plays smarter. And he has been in the system long enough for Pop to give him regular playoff minutes this time around. Simmons is a spark plug. Unless he develops more consistency, he will get spot minutes in the playoffs. Not saying that Simmons can't/won't do that, but as of right now, that's pretty much how it stands, IMO.

    Through the regular season? , Pop can do nearly anything, on any given night. It's nothing unusual for him to leave guys on the bench that have been playing very well. Trying to predict what Pop is going to do before the All Star break is just entertainment. You'll think you have it figured out, and then he'll throw a wrench into it. People will start saying, "this guy's in Pop's doghouse".

    The bigger question, to me, is whether Bertans will be able to earn playoff minutes by the time they roll around. Most of us think he's got that potential, and that could make some issues in the Anderson/Simmons situation. But he's still a first-year Spur, and he will have to show a lot of savvy for Pop to favor him over Kyle in the playoffs, IMO.
    Good points. For the RS, part of the entertaining part of watching it for me is precisely seeing how it all comes together, I loved watching this past season with Anderson, Simmons and Boban developing and bringing different things. Garbage time became some of the most fun garbage team to watch recently, and this season there are the continued development of Anderson and Simmons, plus a lot of new players with untapped potential. It's why I don't say like some: let's just skip to the playoffs. I like to follow everything, from their draft picks to summer league, FA, preseason, the whole thing. I also appreciate team building, this season's growth of Kawhi as the leader. There is a lot to enjoy in the RS. I agree with you, would not surprise at some point we start seeing Bertans, Forbes and others even when ppl have penciled in Lee/Dedmon. There can be schemes in the playoffs that take guys out of the equation, or guys who get exploited (I see Gasol in that possibility). You just never know what may happen, so Pop will develop the whole crew. In perspective, some of the youngest guys are here for another season after this one too and like Simmons who is seeing an increased role and possibly Anderson too, though we don't see it now, some of the rookies may be developed and hit a rook wall to be worked on for season 2 growth. We haven't seen much yet bc this is just starting.

  15. #40
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    10,246
    Life would be easier if slomo bulked up and played at the 4.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •