Reply With Quote
No, but I used to listen to his radio program often, and even watched him on public access TV in Austin long before that. I occasionally watch a random youtube clip if the subject grasps me.
You watch Infowars?
No, but I used to listen to his radio program often, and even watched him on public access TV in Austin long before that. I occasionally watch a random youtube clip if the subject grasps me.
No wonder you're a dumb .
If Chris is a dumb , but can properly figure out how to read an email chain in sequential order, what does that make you?No wonder you're a dumb .
That still leaves me considerably smarter than your paranoid, re ed ass.
You know how everybody's "ready for the election to be over?"
I hate to break it to them, but it's going to be 4 whole years of this after Nov. 8.
It appears you've been misguided. I forgive you of your ignorance and will pray for you in the future.No wonder you're a dumb .
The spin on today's news from both sides is pretty pathetic.
http://www.newsweek.com/fbi-reviewin...-emails-514825
WHY FBI DIRECTOR MADE CLINTON EMAIL ANNOUNCEMENT NOW
BY MICHELE GORMAN AND MATTHEW COOPER ON 10/28/16 AT 2:40 PM
Updated | Why did FBI Director James Comey shock Washington on Friday with an announcement that the FBI “has learned of the existence of emails” related to Hillary Clinton’s private email server, and what does it mean?
The truth is Comey didn’t have a choice. Because the new information followed his sworn testimony about the case, Comey was obligated by Department of Justice rules to keep the relevant committees apprised.
Under oath Comey had stated that the bureau had completed its review. Once he learned that there were new emails that required examination, Comey had to notify Congress that he had to amend his testimony because it was no longer true.
Comey’s letter to congressional committee chairs doesn’t say his agents have discovered new witnesses or do ents suggesting a criminal act occurred. Rather, he only suggests that evidence that has not yet been examined needs to be reviewed because it is relevant to the case.
There’s also a political dimension. Had Comey not told Congress and it emerged after the election that new materials had come into its possession, the director and his entire agency’s credibility might have been questioned.
In his letter, Comey did not use the phrase being touted by Republicans that the case had been reopened. Technically it was never closed. Nor did he signal at all about the importance or unimportance about the emails.
“In connection with an unrelated case, the FBI has learned of the existence of emails that appear to be pertinent to the investigation,” he said in his letter to the chairs. “Although the FBI cannot yet assess whether or not this material may be significant, and I cannot predict how long it will take us to complete this additional work, I believe it is important to update you.”
On the other hand, Comey did not offer any indication from whence the new evidence comes. By his omission he’s left a country in suspense. Later in the day, news reports, unconfirmed by Newsweek, indicated that the emails were found in the course of an investigation of Anthony Weiner, the former New York congressman who is married to Clinton aide Huma Abedin, and that they were found on a device of Weiner’s. He and Abedin announced a marital separation this summer after he was revealed to be exchanging lewd photos and emails with women, one of whom was reportedly underaged.
Republicans were jubilant on Friday, seeing the Comey letter as something that could save the flailing Donald Trump campaign for president. The GOP nominee himself heaped praise on the FBI director after castigating him since his summer announcement that the bureau had not recommended a criminal charge be brought against Clinton.
“I have great respect for the fact that the FBI and the Department of Justice are now willing to have the courage to right the horrible mistake that they made,” Trump said at a rally in New Hampshire early Friday afternoon. “This was a grave miscarriage of justice that the American people fully understood. And it is everybody’s hope that it is about to be corrected.”
House Speaker Paul Ryan called for an end to Clinton receiving classified briefings.
Clinton’s campaign chairman, John Podesta, called on Comey to immediately release more details about the new evidence.
This article has been updated to indicate that news reports say the Clinton emails were uncovered during the investigation of Anthony Weiner and that Podesta has pushed back against Comey.
of course, all y'all rednecks, bubbas IGNORE the real scandal of Repug manslaughter of 5000+ US military by lying USA into invading Iraq for BigOil.
that's "too old history" to think about, but Bill's WH blow job 20 years is extremely pertinent and current.
But your Uncle Tom Obama led us into Syria and all the other places you war-happy LOLiber racist, disgusting deplorables like to selectively forget when trying to look at days gone by so you can ignore the hole your Weapons-Dealing, War Creating, piss-poor joke of "healthcare" which was a ponzi-scheme for the Elitist Left. Stop being selectively stupid, you cretin.
I don't believe for a second these new emails were just found today, or even within this week. Those devices were confiscated from Weiner and Abedin months ago.
Something was coming out regardless and I think this is Comey trying to get ahead of it and save a little face for the FBI.
Evil is such an intellectually bankrupt notion.
Yep they've had it for a while and waited until now to release it. FBI riggin the election for Trump
FBI doing what they should have been doing all along and not being influenced by the White House and DOJ
Waiting until 10 days before the election when Trump desperately needs a swing. Rigged, corrupt FBI.
... one of the many reasons you remain an inveterate dumb .
Comey, having broken FBI protocol in September and trashed Hillary gratuitously, now breaks protocol again.
He says he doesn't know whether the emails on Wiener's phone (not Hillary's server) are significant, or not, and doesn't know how long it will take to go through them, but "I'm damn sure gonna have the world "Look At Me" grandstand with my repeat of protocol-breaking bull to hurt Hillary."
I didn't hear you crying about the corrupt DOJ handing out immunity deals like candy
You can donate here
you guys are a riot
Comey is damned if he do, damned if he doesn't. He could be just covering his ass and over-compensating for all of the "rigged" talk. If he knows they have something (but can't tell if it's significant or trivial) does he take a chance that it explodes after the election and everyone accuses him of holding onto information and rigging the election for Hillary? If he tells everyone now that they're still investigating at least he covers his ass and no one can accuse him of rigging anything. Then of course the flip side is that this is all nothing and he just swayed a few voters to Trump's side which in case if Hillary wins the election she's going to can his ass anyway
Former DoJ spokesman loses it over new FBI probe: Comey ‘flagrantly violated DoJ rules’
In light of the latest revelations, a former DoJ spokesperson went on a Twitter rant in response to Comey’s email, Politico reports.
Matthew Miller started with, “This is such an inappropriate public disclosure by Comey. And sadly the latest in a long string of them.”
Matthew Miller @matthewamiller
This is such an inappropriate public disclosure by Comey. And sadly the latest in a long string of them. https://twitter.com/braddjaffy/status/792049409244663809 …
12:08 PM - 28 Oct 2016
The timing of this latest revelation couldn’t be worse for the Clinton campaign, with just 11 days left until the Election. Miller’s Twitter rant continued with the following:
Comey refused to even tell Congress if FBI was investigating Trump camp for Russia hack, but regular updates on Clinton are apparently A-ok.
I wrote a piece in July on why Comey's public comments about Clinton were such an inappropriate abuse of power. 1/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/james-comeys-abuse-of-power/2016/07/06/7799d39e-4392-11e6-8856-f26de2537a9d_story.html?utm_term=.e52be523a140 …
He flagrantly violated DOJ rules with his press conference. Then went on to break new ground discussing details of the case to Congress...2/
Followed by quickly releasing FBI 302's, something they rarely do, and which I doubt they will do for future high-profile cases. 3/
Each time, he either violated or seriously stretched DOJ rule & precedent. Press conference was the original sin, & it begat the rest. 4/
But today's disclosure might be worst abuse yet. DOJ goes out of its way to avoid publicly discussing investigations close to election. 5/
Not just public discussion either. Often won't send subpoenas or take other steps that might leak until after an election is over...6/
Why? Because voters have no way to interpret FBI/DOJ activity in a neutral way. Who is the target of an investigation? What conduct? 7/
This might be totally benign & not even involve Clinton. But no way for press or voters to know that. Easy for opponent to make hay over. 8/
Which takes us back to the original rule: you don't comment on ongoing investigations. Then multiply that times ten close to an election. 9/
For whatever reason (& there are many theories), Comey continues to ignore that. But only for Clinton. 10/
FBI is undoubtedly investigating links between the Russian hack, Manafort, & the Trump campaign. But aren't commenting on it. Good! 11/
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/10/former-doj-spokesman-loses-it-over-new-fbi-probe-comey-flagrantly-violated-doj-rules/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaig n=Feed%3A+TheRawStory+%28The+Raw+Story%29
They shouldn't be commenting on investigations! But that should apply to all. Instead Clinton consistently treated differently/worse. 12/12
because i'm being tongue in cheek regarding the corruption, which was the excuse given for clinton being let off the hook months ago. you were creaming your pants when the fbi gave somebody immunity to talk, and then you complain about immunity after the fact. it's the conclusion-oriented analysis which is ty
I'll have a shot of Matthew Miller's tears
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
