Wikileaks dump: John Podesta email dump

[TheSanityAnnex]

Re: Eric Schmidt/Google

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/37798

From:[email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: 2015-02-22 21:06
Subject: Re: Eric Schmidt/Google Nice way to travel. JP --Sent from my iPad-- [email protected] For scheduling: [email protected]> On Feb 22, 2015, at 5:58 PM, Hartina Flournoy <[email protected]> wrote:> > FYI. They are donating the Google plane for the Africa trip>> On Feb 22, 2015, at 5:51 PM, John Podesta <[email protected]> wrote:>> >> Yup. I've talked to him too. Robby is in touch with his team. I see no harm in WJC seeing him.>> >> JP>> --Sent from my iPad-->> [email protected]>> For scheduling: [email protected]>> >>> On Feb 22, 2015, at 5:46 PM, Hartina Flournoy <[email protected]> wrote:>>> >>> it is about the business he proposes to do with the campaign. He says he's met with HRC>>>> On Feb 22, 2015, at 5:45 PM, John Podesta <[email protected]> wrote:>>>> >>>> Thx.>>>> >>>> JP>>>> --Sent from my iPad-->>>> [email protected]>>>> For scheduling: [email protected]>>>> >>>>> On Feb 22, 2015, at 3:44 PM, tina <[email protected]> wrote:>>>>> >>>>> FYI. Eric asked to meet with WJC. We are doing on Friday.>>>>> Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T

[TheSanityAnnex]

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails...8915#efmAMHAgP


Fwd: HRC and the email flap

From:[email protected]
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Date: 2015-03-07 15:57
Subject: Fwd: HRC and the email flap ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Anne-Marie Slaughter <[email protected]> Date: Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 11:11 AM Subject: Fwd: HRC and the email flap To: Nick Merrill <[email protected]>, Jake Sullivan < [email protected]>, Cheryl Mills <[email protected]> fyi from Tom F -- not great, but useful to know. I'm thinking about writing an op-ed myself from the point of view of a former State Dept official. Begin forwarded message: Anne-Marie, That doesn't sound unreasonable to me, but she needs to get out there and say it and explain it. I am sure she has a case to be made and right now it is her critics who are making it. Best wishes, Tom On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Anne-Marie Slaughter <[email protected]> wrote:> Tom -- just to follow up, didn't you just move away from AOL a couple of> years ago? Long after you knew you probably should have? Honestly, OTR,> EVERYONE I knew at State used our private email (I used Princeton) when we> were out of the office (except for our blackberries, which were State> issued) because it was so incredibly clunky and difficult to get onto the> State system when we were not in the office (it was a complicated set of> steps and the system always froze or crashed). We sent sensitive but> unclassified do ents to our private emails so we could work on them at> home and then sent them back to our work emails. Moreover, the overall> lesson that everyone had taken away from the Clinton administration was not> to put ANYTHING politically sensitive on email period, regardless of the> system. I remember getting called on that early on -- someone assumed I was> putting something in email so that if it came out in the press later I> would look good -- a consideration that had simply never occurred to me.> What seems most unfair about this is that she was working round the clock> to master a completely new job and set of issues; the State Dept systems> were a mess; she switched from campaign to home and then stuck with that> for four years.> Best,> AM>> On Mar 7, 2015, at 9:05 AM, Friedman Thomas <[email protected]>> wrote:>> Dear Anne-Marie, Thanks for your note. Always happy to hear your> perspective. That all seems true to me, and yet... Even I evolved. I moved to> gmail, got a Mac laptop, got rid of AOL. And I am not the Secretary of> State, bound by very clear government regulations. I have to say I am> troubled by what I have read about what Hillary did. I am keeping an open> until I hear what she has to say, but it doesn't sit right with me. Just to> let you know where I stand. Thanks for reaching out. Allbest, Tom>> On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 8:48 AM, Anne-Marie Slaughter <> [email protected]> wrote:>>> Tom,>> I'm not working directly with Hillary's folks; I can't, given my position>> as head of New America. So this reach-out is on my own initiative. As I>> read all these columns about her email, I just keep remembering two things>> from you and about you that seem very relevant. Your point: "When I sat>> down to write The World is Flat: Facebook didn't exist, Twitter was still a>> sound, the cloud was still in the sky, 4G was a parking place, LinkedIn was>> a prison, applications were what you sent to college, and Skype was a typo">> is still the best thing I know capturing how fast our world is changing.>> You were talking about 2004, a decade ago; now we are talking about 2008, 6>> years ago -- all of this "she should have known, she must have known" is>> ridiculous. In 2008 it was hard for the President to get a blackberry;>> State Department technology was terrible (it still is); we hadn't had any>> major data breaches, private (Target etc) or public (Wikileaks; Snowden).>> The other thing I keep remembering is how you were still using an AOL>> account until very recently. Even as sophisticated a tech guru as you just>> sticks with what you know amid the constant pressures of a busy life. We>> all know there is a better system out there; we should switch, but it's>> such a pain and we don't have time ....>>>> Just some reflections. But both seem very relevant to putting all this in>> some perspective.>> All best,>> AM

[TheSanityAnnex]

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/37262#efmAC9AE0

Eric Schmidt from Google working directly with campaign

[boutons_deux]

How many of Hillary's emails were classified at the time of sending/receiving?

Americans are so ing stupid, ignorant for inhaling the Repug smoke machine.

"mishandling classified emails"? there' NOTHING THERE

[TheSanityAnnex]

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails...7306#efmAEuAKa

Re: HILLARY CLINTON

From:[email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: 2015-06-01 11:46
Subject: Re: HILLARY CLINTON Thx.

On Jun 1, 2015 9:02 AM, "RICHARD TERRELONGE" <[email protected]> wrote:> Hi,>> The Federal Reserve is contemplating raising interest rates this year.> Federal Reserve policy changes take about six months before the policy> changes start to be apparent in economic statistics>> If the FED raises rates in September, as some pundits think, this will> start to show up in statistics in March of 2016, the height of campaign> season.>> There is no need for the FED to tighten monetary policy at this point as> the economy is still playing catch up and it will provide head winds for> the democratic field and advantages for the right wing.>> Cheerio> Richard Terrelonge - Certified Flight Instructor> FAA Safety Team Representative - > [email protected] - K4RDT

[TheSanityAnnex]

How many of Hillary's emails were classified at the time of sending/receiving?

Americans are so ing stupid, ignorant for inhaling the Repug smoke machine.

"mishandling classified emails"? there' NOTHING THERE

[boutons_deux]

How many of Hillary's emails were classified at the time of sending/receiving?

Americans are so ing stupid, ignorant for inhaling the Repug smoke machine.

[TheSanityAnnex]

"Discovered isn't fair since we handed them to him last August. But yes, his committee was the first to see the email address. Before then, State had determined that none of her email - WHICH THEY HAD UNDER OUR BASIC PREMISE - fit the criteria of Issa's letter of Oct 2012. Sounds nuts, but the only thing State has produced to the Hill prior to these last 300, we're in response to that single original letter. It's not that 535 members weren't emailing, but State only responded to the oversight committee, and to others as a courtesy with boilerplate or when available something already made public. Now, they don't know and wouldn't agree with State's decision to not turn over any HRC email until August 2014 - but at the moment, they firmly believe that State didn't because State didn't have them. Which flies in the face of logic because they got something last August, months before the paper production. So they are conflating State's decision on what of hers should be transmitted with this latest news of the personal account. Also worth noting that it's been 30 months since the attack, but she was only in office for the first 4. Point being, what was since then has been by the Kerry State Department. So even if they believe we rigged the Department's legal team, that doesn't make sense since she left office. "

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/39242

[TheSanityAnnex]

Sheik Mohammed approached CHAI in 2006 shortly after we opened an office in Addis Ababa. He proposed that he would give $2 million to CHAI every year that YOU visited Ethiopia. We eventually negotiated an Agreement with his Washington attorney, George Salem, in which he agreed to fund CHAI at a rate of $2 million per year for 10 years. They rejected any proposals to put a payment schedule in the agreement, but dropped any reference tying the donation to YOU visiting Ethiopia.
The Agreement was officially signed at a meeting in London in May 2007 by the Sheik and Bruce, after which the Sheik presented you with a a check for $2 million for the 2007 payment. The Agreement is very general and does not require any specific proposals from CHAI for how the money will be spent or any reporting. The only requirement is that the money be spent within Ethiopia. During negotiations they rejected our proposal that some of the money could be used for global overhead.


See attachment.

https://www.wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/38048

[TheSanityAnnex]

RE: I don't suggest you do this before John sees the WSJ CEO's tomorrow

From:[email protected]
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Date: 2015-11-17 02:07
Subject: RE: I don't suggest you do this before John sees the WSJ CEO's tomorrow



Following up.

*From:* Neera Tanden [mailto:[email protected]]
*Sent:* Monday, November 16, 2015 10:51 PM
*To:* Jake Sullivan <[email protected]>; John Podesta <
[email protected]>; Maya Harris <[email protected]>
*Subject:* I don't suggest you do this before John sees the WSJ CEO's
tomorrow


but you may want to rip the out of this. Honestly, talk about letting
CEO's off the hook! Given wall street kerfuffle, seems like a good move.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...b06037734a2f84

we are trying to come to an agreement to get rid of it in the final package
of cjs in the House (not in Senate bill, but now w/ house moves, Hatch
trying to add to the senate). I think her ripping it would actually help
our negotiations.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/37559

[boutons_deux]

RE: I don't suggest you do this before John sees the WSJ CEO's tomorrow

From:[email protected]
To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]
Date: 2015-11-17 02:07
Subject: RE: I don't suggest you do this before John sees the WSJ CEO's tomorrow



Following up.

*From:* Neera Tanden [mailto:[email protected]]
*Sent:* Monday, November 16, 2015 10:51 PM
*To:* Jake Sullivan <[email protected]>; John Podesta <
[email protected]>; Maya Harris <[email protected]>
*Subject:* I don't suggest you do this before John sees the WSJ CEO's
tomorrow


but you may want to rip the out of this. Honestly, talk about letting
CEO's off the hook! Given wall street kerfuffle, seems like a good move.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...b06037734a2f84

we are trying to come to an agreement to get rid of it in the final package
of cjs in the House (not in Senate bill, but now w/ house moves, Hatch
trying to add to the senate). I think her ripping it would actually help
our negotiations.

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/37559

Where's Hillary's, or anybody's, "crime"?

nope, there ain't no crime, only smoke

[TheSanityAnnex]

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/38338

[TheSanityAnnex]

Where's Hillary's, or anybody's, "crime"?

nope, there ain't no crime, only smoke

[boutons_deux]

where is the crime?

Karl Rove deleted 2M WH emails on the PRIVATE RNC EMAIL SERVER, where is the Repugs' outrage?

[CosmicCowboy]

Watching Bookaki's contortions trying to rationalize every shady thing the Clinton's have ever done is freaking hilarious...

[TheSanityAnnex]

https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/36009



Fwd: Flagging Turkish campaign donations

John, heard this second hand but more than once. Seems Erdogan faction is making substantial investments in U.S. to counter opposition (CHP, Kurds, Gulenists etc.) outreach to policymakers and USG. Am told that the Erdogan crew also tries to make inroads via donations to Democratic candidates, including yours. Two names that you should be aware of are Mehmet Celebi and Ali Cinar. Happy to elaborate on the phone, provided you are not shopping at the liquor store.

[TheSanityAnnex]

where is the crime?

Karl Rove deleted 2M WH emails on the PRIVATE RNC EMAIL SERVER, where is the Repugs' outrage?

[TheSanityAnnex]

New State Department Do ents Reveal More Clinton-Abedin Email Exchanges of Classified Information on Unsecure Server

Emails Also Reveal Special Favor for Top Clinton Foundation Donor, Distribution of Clinton State Department Schedule to Foundation Staff

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released 323 pages of new Department of State do ents, including previously unreleased email exchanges in which Clinton and top aide Huma Abedin sent classified information over Clinton’s clintonemail.com unsecure email system. According to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) exemptions cited in the do ents obtained by Judicial Watch, three of the Clinton-Abedin email exchanges contained material “classified to protect national security.”
Also included in the newly obtained do ents is an additional instance of the State Department doing special favors for a high-dollar Clinton Foundation donor. And the do ents include instances of the distribution by State Department officials of Clinton’s government schedule to members of the Clinton Foundation staff.
The do ents contain not previously turned over to the State Department, bringing the known total to date of such emails uncovered by Judicial Watch to 238 new Clinton emails (not part of the 55,000 pages of emails that Clinton turned over to the State Department). These records further appear to contradict statements by Clinton that, “as far as she knew,” all of her government emails were turned over to the State Department.
The new records include three separate Clinton-Abedin email exchanges withheld in part from Judicial Watch under the State Department’s “B1” FOIA exemption, applying to “Information that is classified to protect national security”:

From: sbwhoeop[Redacted]
To: H:
Sent: Thu Oct 08 [8:08:03] 2009
Subject: Fw: Memo on latest N.I. negotiations; yr trip; from Shaun W Sid
CONFIDENTIAL

October 8, 2009

For: Hillary
From: Sid
Re: Latest/N. Ireland
After five hours of talk at Downing Street tonight, Thursday, October 8, Shaun Woodward tells me that it seems Gordon Brown has brokered a financial package with Peter Robinson and Martin McGuinness that may in turn break the deadlock of devolution of policing and justice. They have covered the major issues in stage two in their discussions. On Monday, Brown will formally set out the details in a letter to Robinson and McGuinness. Gordon will share these with you when you meet with him on Sunday at Chequers. Shaun says that both Robinson and McGuinness, subject to some minor details, should be in a position to recommend to Unionists and Nationalists that this is a strong deal. The letter will confirm the details. [Redacted due to information “kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy;” “foreign relations or foreign activities of the US, including confidential sources”] I hope that’s right.
From: H
To: Huma Abedin
Sent: Thu Oct 08 [8:08:04] 2009
Subject: Fw: Memo on latest N.I. negotiations; yr trip; from Shaun W Sid
Pls print.
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 8:10:04 PM
To: Humamabedin[Redacted]
Subject: Fw: Memo on latest N.I. [Northern Ireland] negotiations; yr trip; from Shaun W Sid
Attachments: hrc memo n. ireland 100809.docx

***

From: sbwhoeop[Redacted]
To: H
Sent: Sun Oct 11 [8:46:43] 2009
Subject: Memo on your speech meeting on Monday, Sid
CONFIDENTIAL

October 11, 2009

For: Hillary
From: Sid
Re: Your speech and meeting on Monday
I have not seen your speech obviously that you will deliver Monday morning at Stormont. Shaun tells me that it’s a good speech, and you’re right not to instruct the parties what to do but to encourage them to address why completing devolution needs to be done [Redacted due to information “kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy;” “foreign relations or foreign activities of the US, including confidential sources”] That’s it.
From: H
To: Huma Abedin
Sent: Monday Oct 12 02:06:15 2009
Subject: Fw: H: Memo on your speech meeting on Monday, Sid
Pls print
From: Huma Abedin [Huma@[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 2:11:38 AM
To: humamabedin[Redacted]
Subject: Fw: H: Memo on your speech meeting on Monday, Sid
Attachments: hrc memo ni [sic] meeting 101209 docx

***

From: H [email protected]
To: Sullivan, Jacob J
Sent: Sun Oct 25 11:13:17 2009
Subject: Re: Honduras
First, Tom’s travel date hasn’t been set – will be Tuesday or Wednesday we think. He is coordinating with Don Restrepo to see if they can go together [Redacted due to information “kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy”] So that’s where we are. We’ll have more to report tomorrow.

***

From Sullivan, Jacob J [email protected]
To: H
Sent: Sun Oct 25 [11:49:45] 2009
Subject: Re: Honduras
Sounds good.
There will be those who take a hard line on the elections, but perhaps some fence-sitting countries could be persuaded on conditional recognition. I’ll flag it for Tom and Craig.
From: H
To: Huma Abedin
Sent: Mon Oct 26 07:27:12 2009
Subject: Fw: Honduras
All of this did not print last night, It stopped after Fourth! [Redacted due to information “kept secret in the interest of national defense or foreign policy;” “foreign relations or foreign activities of the US, including confidential sources”]
From: Huma Abedin [[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 8:06:12 AM
To: humaabedin [Redacted]
Subject: Fw: Honduras

The emails also include an exchange between Abedin, Clinton personal assistant Lauren Jiloty, and Iris Anaya, the assistant to sugar magnate and Clinton Foundation donor Alfonso Fanjul concerning a request for special access to Clinton. On October 13, 2009, Anaya emailed Abedin seeking to arrange a meeting between Fanjul, the CEO of Florida Crystals, and Clinton. Jiloty responded the next day, asking that Anaya talk with Clinton scheduler Lona Valmoro about “setting up a meeting.” Fanjul donated more than $100,000 to the Clinton Foundation and was a Bill Clinton co-chairman in Florida.
In an October 26, 2009, email exchange, power attorney and Hillary Clinton financial supporter, Charlie Ann Syprett, contacted Doug Band, apparently seeking help in getting around U.S. Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) restrictions on U.S. citizens’ ability to travel to Cuba. Syprett ostensibly wanted a waiver from the restrictions to enable people from her organization, SYC Charitable Foundation, to travel to Cuba, noting “we are not asking for something out of the ordinary.”
The emails also show that Valmoro sent Clinton’s government schedule to the unsecure email addresses of numerous members of the Clinton Foundation staff on October 16, 2009, again on October 18, 2009, and on October 25, 2009. The emails also include discussions of personnel matters and appointments on Clinton’s unsecure account, which may run afoul of federal privacy law.
This is the thirteenth set of records produced for Judicial Watch by the State Department from the non-state.gov email accounts of Huma Abedin. The do ents were produced under a court order in a May 5, 2015, Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit against the State Department requiring the agency to produce “all emails of official State Department business received or sent by former Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin from January 1, 2009 through February 1, 2013, using a ‘non-state’.gov email address” (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00684)). Previous records releases do ented special Clinton State Department consideration for Clinton Foundation supporters (see here, here, and here.)
“We’ve once again uncovered classified information in Hillary Clinton’s and Huma Abedin’s emails,” said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. “It is frankly remarkable that the FBI and Justice Department are only now investigating Abedin’s connection to Clinton’s mishandling of classified information.”

[spurraider21]

would be interesting if the "i dont really like trump either" crowd spent half the time digging for dirt on donald that they do for hillary

[Spurminator]

would be interesting if the "i dont really like trump either" crowd spent half the time digging for dirt on donald that they do for hillary

I don't really like Trump, but I'm going to spend hours a day gleefully sharing the same info and points of view as the Trump wing of the Internet.

I'll also be here gloating endlessly if he wins. But I'm not voting for him. I have self respect.

[pgardn]

would be interesting if the "i dont really like trump either" crowd spent half the time digging for dirt on donald that they do for hillary

Well Hillary has been in government so.... When Donald becomes president he will fly the bestest biggest breasted term we have ever witnessed.

Big League.

Have you ever seen something so good I have never seen anything so good. Its gonna be so great you'll say I have never seen something so great.

Baby... In my wet dreams your taking a number type fantastic.

[boutons_deux]

There's PLENTY of DIRT on Trash, see the Church of Trump thread, but the Trash supporters ignore.

[Reck]

Whatever happened to these wackos? They haven't release anything worthy for weeks.

Did they get neutered or what?

[TheSanityAnnex]

Whatever happened to these wackos? They haven't release anything worthy for weeks.

Did they get neutered or what?

These last two weeks have had the most damaging leaks. And yes, someone tried to neuter them and is scared of what they have left

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/wikileaks-hit-targeted-cyberattack-after-publishing-over-8000-more-dnc-emails-1590267?utm_source=yahoo&utm_medium=referral&utm_c ampaign=rss&utm_content=/rss/yahoous&yptr=yahoo

[boutons_deux]

Lots of smoke by a imprisoned foreigner ing around in US elections, but no fire.