FBI vault Twitter

[TheSanityAnnex]

First of all, we can safety say that piece of letter is not talking about Hillary.

It clearly says President Clinton staffer, probably referring to one of Bill's staffers.


It'd be odd for the person in question to be Huma Abedin because 1, Hillary is not president and 2, she's not a Bill Clinton staffer.

How can you safely say it was not about Hillary Clinton when the guy who set up her server, Brian Pagliano, is clearly mentioned along with the server. You are aware Brian Pagliano set up Hillary's server?

[Reck]

[B]

All of those tweets became available at the same time after having not tweeted in over a year. You really think those topics all become available on that day and were "next in line" to be automatically released?

The tweets were very specific. And now this is released


https://vault.fbi.gov/vincent-foster...-01-of-04/view

The FBI said that if something gets requested more than 3 times that it automatically gets release or something like that. No doubt this was the Trump campaign at work.

This is classic Trump. This is the same reason he thought that parading Bill's accusers before a debate was relevant somehow. We know how that turned out. Because after all why would the FBI be releasing something as irrelevant as something from 2001.

BTW..that Rich guy you were talking about last night is dead. So I dont see how this is at all relevant now.

Like I said, this has Trump written all over it.

[TheSanityAnnex]

The FBI said that if something gets requested more than 3 times that it automatically gets release or something like that. No doubt this was the Trump campaign at work.

This is classic Trump. This is the same reason he thought that parading Bill's accusers before a debate was relevant somehow. We know how that turned out.

Disagree completely. The FBI obviously knows how their automated system works and timed this right with the DOJ announcement.

Because after all why would the FBI be releasing something as irrelevant as something from 2001.

BTW..that Rich guy you were talking about last night is dead. So I dont see how this is at all relevant now.

Like I said, this has Trump written all over it.

Read up on Mark Rich and who was involved in his pardon.

http://www.npr.org/2016/11/01/500297...n-of-marc-rich

[boutons_deux]

More details on the Clinton/Podesta/Kadzick ties

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-1...re-just-one-pr

... where is the crime?

Why do you find only Clinton ties?

Are you assuming NO TIES exist between Repug politicians and sources of backdoor $100Ms?

Of course, you are.

[TheSanityAnnex]

So you want to talk to Mark Cuban on the latest Hillary email thing eh?

You ought to try someone with a bit of credibility. You see, Mark Cuban is not ignorant and his appearance this morning on CNBC did not contain "mistakes."

He was lying.

This "newly discovered" laptop is very likely to be literal nuclear waste for Hillary and everyone around her, including the Clinton Foundation and all of Hillary's "advisers" such as Podesta.

Mark Cuban said that Huma used Outlook and IMAP (for Yahoo and similar.) True.

But then he said this was unlikely to lead to "new" evidence in the form of the emails.

That's a lie.

It's a lie because Cuban knows he's full of crap; he knows enough about the technologies involved to be fully aware that he was peddling nonsense.

IMAP and Exchange are email protocols. (So is POP3, but that's pretty much deprecated everywhere for good reason.) Exchange, when available, is often preferred by business people because it syncs not just email but also calendars and contact lists, which can (and does) include both phone numbers and email addresses.

IMAP is typically used by clients like Thunderbird because it doesn't know to speak Exchange. There's a plug-in for calendars using the davical protocol and another (the SoGo connector) for contacts, but no integrated Exchange support.

Outlook can use IMAP, but where the server supports it (like Clinton's "homebrewed" email server) Exchange would normally be used instead as a preferred choice. It both does more and also does a far better job of threading conversations (which is very convenient) and thus is almost-always preferred when it is available.

Here's the problem for the Clintons: Both of these protocols will sync any folder they are told to monitor and can be told to pull local copies of emails. By default both will typically do so on a desktop or laptop environment because WiFi is usually available and it has enough bandwidth to make that efficient. Mobile devices sometimes are configured to only grab email headers by default but increasingly, with 4g service, they're set up to get full messages too, sometimes including all attachments.

The reason to do this is that it is a lot faster to search messages locally than over the wire, and it's convenient to be able to search messages. In addition pulling full copies (including attachments) allows you to work offline (when there's no WiFi or other network available), and then re-sync when you get back in range.

Here's the problem for Hillary -- when the server had emails deleted and then was "Bleached" it had already been taken offline and was never returned to service. As such the laptop client would have been unable to connect back to it and thus it would never be told to remove anything.

Without that machine (Weiner's laptop) being under remote administration such as Domain Policy control (which we can reasonably assume it was not as Huma claims "she didn't know about it" and it was allegedly a private laptop) there is no remote capability to wipe or otherwise get into said computer and remove the emails either. In fact there's a decent chance it's running an operating system edition (if Windows) that lacks domain control capability entirely.

This means that the odds are extremely high that all of the deleted emails to which Huma was a participant are on that computer.

Every.
Single.
One.

If that examination shows that work product, or worse, classified information was sent and/or received and the evidence intentionally destroyed via the "Bleachbit" process then everyone involved is cooked. Remember, the claim was that the emails deleted were nothing more than yoga chat and similar; all "personal" content that the government had no right to and implicated no national security interest. Further, Huma claimed twice (once during her exit from State, and again under oath when questioned) that she had turned over all devices that might or did have US Government work product on them and had retained no copies.

If that is proved to be a lie, or worse, proof of felony conduct such as influence peddling or (God forbid for them) something like the rumored link to Epstein's Lolita Express is found in those archives then a whole bunch of people are going straight to prison not only on the original acts evidenced in the emails themselves but also on felony obstruction of justice and perjury charges.

Yes, folks, this is a very big deal because it is the first discovery of a computer that appears to have been sync'd against the Clinton server but was neither tampered with or destroyed, and thus it likely contains all of the pertinent evidence to which Huma was a part.

I argue that the media is lying and soliciting others to lie. Mark Cuban knows all of this as he's well-aware of how email works on the Internet. I'm aware of it too, having run an ISP during the early 1990s, having run corporate, personal and ISP-level email servers both before and since up to and including the present day, and I can confidently state that unless someone took affirmative action to alter the record the odds are extremely high that every single email chain Huma participated in is likely on that laptop, whether Hillary and her friends tried to delete it or not.

I'm a subject matter expert in this regard folks.

Yeah, CNBC, I'm not your biggest fan. But you (and the rest of the media) know damn well I can get to a studio in about an hour and a half and if you call I will be happy to don a suit (ok, at least the top half that the camera can see) and scoot on over to correct the record from a technical level on exactly what has been found and what is likely now in both the FBI's and the NY State Police/NYPD's hands.

Consider this an open invite to any of the MSM folks to do exactly that; you folks all still have my phone number and I can only conclude it hasn't rung because you are not interested in the truth from someone who has the technical competence to explain it to your viewers.

Report the news, media wonks, instead of trying to shape it.

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=231606

[boutons_deux]

where is the crime that puts Hillary in prison?

[TheSanityAnnex]

DOJ's been feeding Clinton camp information during FBI investigation and look who it is.



From: *Peter Kadzik* <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2015
Subject: Heads up
To: John Podesta <[email protected]>


There is a HJC oversight hearing today where the head of our Civil Division
will testify. Likely to get questions on State Department emails. Another
filing in the FOIA case went in last night or will go in this am that
indicates it will be awhile (2016) before the State Department posts the
emails.

[boutons_deux]

DOJ's been feeding Clinton camp information during FBI investigation and look who it is.



From: *Peter Kadzik* <[email protected]>
Date: Tuesday, May 19, 2015
Subject: Heads up
To: John Podesta <[email protected]>


There is a HJC oversight hearing today where the head of our Civil Division
will testify. Likely to get questions on State Department emails. Another
filing in the FOIA case went in last night or will go in this am that
indicates it will be awhile (2016) before the State Department posts the
emails.

where is the crime that puts Hillary, or anybody, in prison, dear InfoWars protege?

[TheSanityAnnex]

Uh oh....Cheryl Mills ordering technicians to delete files from her's and Samuelson's workstations---Bleachbit




https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-cli...-part-03-of-04


https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/48ca7cbc836e6c766d17bb87debff032fe889262943ede2f98 29362da7c8ca0c.png

[ElNono]

Thanks for the clarification, sounds like hacked was the wrong word I don't know about this type stuff. So if someone's email account on the Clinton server was hacked, would you consider the server compromised?

The email account is compromised. At least that's all you can surmise from that excerpt. That's like when somebody's yahoo email account gets hacked. Whether that account contained sensitive information or not, that's certainly something we can't gather from that excerpt, but obviously can't be ruled out either.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Score another one for FBIanon

[SnakeBoy]

Hillary Clinton Infected from Weiner Leaks
http://theblacksphere.net/2016/11/hi...-weiner-leaks/

[SnakeBoy]

Damn, just watching breaking news from Brett Baier...is it possible TSA is going to be right for once.

[ElNono]

You should never mess with a guy called Carlos Danger, tbh....

[TheSanityAnnex]

TLDR: The Democrats have been illegally supplying Iran's Nuclear Program since 2009. Obama, John Kerry, and Hillary Clinton have all benefited financially from it.
Hillary Clinton has ties to the mining/commodity trading industry through her old criminal pal Marc Rich. Through Rich's company Glencore, Hillary Clinton can be tied to:
Terrorism, the Drug trade, Iran's Nuclear Program, North Korea, and even Apartheid South Africa
Everyone largely believes that Hillary Clinton is corrupt. I believe so too, but I believe it's in a different vein of corruption. I believe there is a long running criminal conspiracy in our Government that dates back to the 1970s in its origin, and continues to this day. In order to prove that point, I need to answer a few questions :
Who is Marc Rich?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Rich
Marc Rich was born December 18, 1934 and died on June 26, 2013. He was a businessmen, his focus was in banking and trade commodities.
Rich founded the commodities trading giant Glencore. Today it is the World's 3rd largest family business, and the 10th largest company on the Fortune Global 500 list. It has headquarters in Switzerland, London, the Netherlands, and Jersey. As well subsidiaries all around the globe. Without a doubt its primary interests are oil, gas, and mining.
Marc Rich was indicted in the United States in 1983 with business partner Picnus Green and fled the country.
What did Marc Rich do?
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/27/bu...w-nytimes&_r=0
https://www.theguardian.com/business...es?INTCMP=SRCH
Marc Rich and Pincus Green were indicted on 65 criminal counts including: tax evasion, wire fraud, racketeering, and trading with Iran during the 1973-1974 Oil Embargo, when Rich used contacts in Iran and Iraq to cir vent the sanctions.
In his own biography, and to his biographer Daniel Amann, Rich said his "most important and most profitable" business deals happened by violating international trade embargoes and doing business with the apartheid regime of South Africa.
Rich admitted to doing business with: Apartheid South Africa, Fidel Castro's Cuba, Marxist Angola, the Nicaraguan Sandinistas, Gaddafi's Libya, Ceausescu's Romania, and Pinochet's Chile.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bank_o..._legal_actions
Rich was also believed to be involved with the Bank of Credit and Commerce International: a bank which was closed down for laundering money for people such as Saddamm Hussein, Manuel Noriega, and the Medellin Cartel and the terrorist group Abu Nidal. Rich was even reported to have been involved in arms deals in Iraq in the 1980s.
Okay, that's who Marc Rich was. By why is that important?
Marc Rich was pardoned by President Bill Clinton on January 20, 2001, hours before leaving office, in what the New York Times would call one of history's most "flagrant abuses of presidential power."
Why was Rich's pardon so bad?
Long story short? Rich bought his pardon.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/pardoned...ch-dead-at-78/
Rich funneled $1 million to the Democratic party, including more than $100,000 to Hillary Clinton's Senate Campaign in New York, and $450,000 to the Clinton Library foundation.
It was arguably the most controversial moment of Clinton's presidency. He went on to defend it, even citing the arguments of another controversial pardon receiver, one "Scooter" Libby.
http://legaltimes.typepad.com/files/...jamescomey.pdf
Then Deputy Attorny General Eric Holder argued for Rich's pardon. Eric Holder was Obama's first Attorney General
The pardon of Marc Rich was so controversial there was a federal hearing on it. It was originally prosecuted by Federal Prosecutor Mary Jo White, but she stepped down and was replaced by the current director of the FBI James Comey, who ultimately found "No evidence of criminal activity." According to the Washington Post.
http://nypost.com/2001/03/27/brits-s...for-marc-rich/
Just more evidence of Rich's drug ties.
The Clinton Pardons/Drug ties of People involved
Now, Marc Rich hard long standing ties to terrorist organizations and the drug trade.
For a moment, I want to focus on the latter, and not the former.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/08/26/us...tml?ref=topics
Clinton considered pardoning a known drug trafficker after a man, one Tommy Gambino, approached Clinton's brother Roger Clinton on a golf course, handed him a rolex watch and had a conversation about presuading his brother to do so.
Roger Clinton's efforts to get Rosario Gambino pardoned were so persistent the FBI investigated them.
http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/23/us...spotlight.html
Roger has a long history of involvment in cocaine.
http://www.politico.com/magazine/sto...-rodham-116674
But Roger also received a pardon for cocaine conviction.
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...gh-tony-rodham
Hugh Rodham, Hillary Clinton's brother, received $434,000 to lobby for a pardon of a cocaine trafficker, and he did so successfully.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATF_gunwalking_scandal
Now, some may say it's disingenous to say Eric Holder has drug ties. But he is tied to the late Marc Rich, and we should all remember the time he helped facilitate the transfer of firearms to Mexican Drug Cartels.
http://www.hsbc.com/news-and-insight...ins-hsbc-board
Current FBI Director James Comey sat on the board of banking giant HSBC.
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics...-joke-20121213
The same Banking Giant that launders drug cartel money. And has been caught, charged and fined for doing so.
https://investments.hsbc.co.uk/news/...-s-coal-policy
HSBC is also responsible for many of Glencore's investments. Again, Glencore was founded by the criminal Marc Rich, who paid for a pardon by former President Bill Clinton. A pardon which was investigated by James Comey, who sat on the board of HSBC, which laundered drug cartel money, and did business with a company that worked intimately with drug traffickers. Comey found "No evidence of criminal activity."
Okay, so Glencore, the Clinton's, HSBC, the director the FBI are somehow all linked to eachother and to drug cartels. So what? Where does this lead.
Okay, now this is where things begin to get a little technical, and more questions have to get answered.
Who is John Podesta, and what is Joule Unlimited?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Podesta
John Podesta is the Chariman of the 2016 Hillary Clinton presidential campaign. He also was the Counselor to the President for Barack Obama, the White House Chief of Staff for Bill Clinton, and he also
https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/4635
Owns 75,000 shares of an energy company known as Joule Unlimited Technologies, Inc.
Who or what is Joule Unlimited Technologies, Inc?
I'm glad you asked. http://www.jouleunlimited.com/
Joule Unlimited is another comodities trading giant, founded by Noubar Afeyan, and has a certain Russian Politician on it's board.
One Anatoly Chubais
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anatoly_Chubais
Chubais of course, being a Russian politician, works for Vladimir Putin
http://www.newsweek.com/whats-behind...kremlin-453675
Chubais actually invited Putin to St. Petersburg in 1996.
http://www.jouleunlimited.com/joule-audi
Joule Unlimited Partners with Audi. Which is owned by Volkswagen.
Let's talk terrorism
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl...lencore-stakes
Volkswagen, via it's stake holders in Qatar, is intimately tied with, that's right, none other than Glencore.
http://english.aawsat.com/2011/05/ar...n-glencore-ipo
http://www.wsj.com/articles/cobalts-...les-1444055689
Saudi billionaire Prince Alwaleed(Remember the one that was mean to Trump?) invested $400 million into Glencore's IPO in 2011.
Why are the Saudi's, Qatar, and the Democrats interested in Glencore? Short Answer? Terroism and money. Long answer? Terrorism and money.
http://oilprice.com/Latest-Energy-Ne...l-Trading.html
https://www.theguardian.com/business...pplier-nuclear
http://www.iraq-businessnews.com/tag/glencore/
http://time.com/4055466/glencore/
http://m.4-traders.com/GLENCORE-PLC-...inal-22861238/
Glencore is a trading company. They trade lots of things.
Once Gadaffi fell in 2011, they began trading Libyan oil again.
They trade Yemen's oil
They trade Iraqi oil.
Once the Iran deal was hitched, they began trading Iranian copper.
In 2012 and 2013, they were caught trading aluminum to Iran's nuclear program(which was against international law at the time).
And as Time reads, government policy since 2008(Gee what happened in 2008? Hmm) has made it so Glencore could sit back and make "EASY MONEY"
https://twitter.com/wikileaks/status/786646253358768128
Wikileaks has shown us Saudi Arabia and Qatar, Glencore investors TIED to Joule Unlimited and John Podesta, and thus in multiple directions James Comey, The Clintons, and the democrats, fund ISIS. And Qatar Gave Bill Clinton $1 million for a 5 minute meeting in 2011
$1 million for a five minute meeting in 2011? Didn't Gadaffi fall in 2011? Didn't Saudi Arabia invest $400 million into Glencore in 2011? Didn't Glencore begin trading Libyan Oil in 2011?
YES YES YES YES YES YES YES YES
Does it go deeper? See above
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/11/us...-pipeline.html
https://agmetalminer.com/2015/11/04/...n-keystone-xl/
What's that?META EDIT:I NEED TO EXPAND THIS PART Glencore is tied to the Keystone Pipeline?
Okay, let's slow down and take a step back. So Glencore is evil. But what does that REALLY have to do with Hillary Clinton? Where's the connection?
Right under our noses.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-0...housing-market
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-0...num-warehouses
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...506_story.html
Goldman Sachs, Glencore, and Tony Rodham((Weird how they're all tied to Hillary)) have shady, shady mining deals
http://www.northkoreatimes.com/index.php/sid/233981609
Glencore is still working with North Korea. They are trying to have an aluminum monopoly in the US, and have been busted selling aluminum to the Iranian nuclear program...are they funding the North Korean one as well?
https://www.fastmarkets.com/base-met...inc-concs-gap/
Glencore's chinese section, Xtrata, has deep ties to heavy metal mining and North Korea, including aluminum and nickel
http://af.reuters.com/article/sudanN...76B1Q420110712
Glencore also benefits from trading Sudanese Oil. They sure have no problem showing up where human rights violations occur
https://www.wfp.org/content/un-agenc...wheat-glencore
Glencore gets mining contracts in North Korea via China, and gets to sell food futures to North Korea via the United Nations. It's amazing how centered around Glencore the world's elite actually are.
https://books.google.com/books?id=-6...0korea&f=false
The success of Glencore is directly tied to the success of the Chinese government. Note how Trump wants to be tougher on China, but Clinton does not.
https://ramumine.wordpress.com/tag/glencore-xstrata/
Remember the Honduran coup? Guess which company benefitted from Hillary's mucking about in Honduras? That's right, Glencore.
Okay, so for years Glencore has been benefiting from Hillary's foriegn policy. But how does Hillary Benefit from Glencore? Let's move to Canada for a bit, shall we?
https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/nat...Z5M/story.html
The Canadian branch of the Clintons, The Clinton-Giustra Enterprise, which accepts money from the same mining industry the Clinton's have been linked to, the same mining industry benefiting from all of Hillary and Bill's foreign policy 'blunders' over the years, would not be excluded, and certainly have not been so far, from being tied to her.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...18e_story.html
The Clinton-Giustra Enterprise has SECRET DONORS, which are largely from the Mining/Commodity industry, which has been the beneficiary of ALL OF CLINTON'S ACTIONS
http://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/canadia...osts-1.2980962
The Clinton-Giustra Enterprise Charity has extremely high costs, with extremely low return. Seems like a great way to launder money into yourself
https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...9dd_story.html
Giustra, a mining billionaire, sources donations in Canada from his crooked friends for Crooked Hillary.
http://nypost.com/2016/01/17/after-p...s-off-friends/
There you have it folks. A Massive money laundering scheme spanning from US to Asia to the Middle East and back to Canada, in order for the Clinton's and pals to get around international law.
In other words, Glencore.

[Spurminator]

What do you think of what you just posted, TSA?

[TheSanityAnnex]

Honestly don't know what to think anymore, the whole conspiracy theory stuff was just entertaining at first, but what's come out in the last week has been absolutely amazing.

I followed that FBIanon thread on 4chan when it started, I knew it'd be laughed to oblivion here so I didn't bother posting it back in August. It was even too far out there for me. Low and behold it's actually happening just as described. We are witnessing the FBI and anonymous citizens online working together to expose massive corruption in our government. It's ing insane to go back and reread some of those AMA's and see it play out in real time.

[HI-FI]

Honestly don't know what to think anymore, the whole conspiracy theory stuff was just entertaining at first, but what's come out in the last week has been absolutely amazing.

I followed that FBIanon thread on 4chan when it started, I knew it'd be laughed to oblivion here so I didn't bother posting it back in August. It was even too far out there for me. Low and behold it's actually happening just as described. We are witnessing the FBI and anonymous citizens online working together to expose massive corruption in our government. It's ing insane to go back and reread some of those AMA's and see it play out in real time.

i sort of been following this for awhile and it's definetly fascinating, even if it turns out to simply be a mind . If this is true then the corruption is far worse than we can imagine and bigger than Shillary.
There was another 4chan post recently that wasn't part of your boy's archives but it said something similar. It also mentioned how a tape of Shillary would emerge showing her true vile nature but I'm starting to wonder if that tape doesn't exist.

[hater]

i sort of been following this for awhile and it's definetly fascinating, even if it turns out to simply be a mind . If this is true then the corruption is far worse than we can imagine and bigger than Shillary.
There was another 4chan post recently that wasn't part of your boy's archives but it said something similar. It also mentioned how a tape of Shillary would emerge showing her true vile nature but I'm starting to wonder if that tape doesn't exist.

I been clamoring this for over 6 months niga. wish you had listened earlier wish many had

[TheSanityAnnex]

i sort of been following this for awhile and it's definetly fascinating, even if it turns out to simply be a mind . If this is true then the corruption is far worse than we can imagine and bigger than Shillary.
There was another 4chan post recently that wasn't part of your boy's archives but it said something similar. It also mentioned how a tape of Shillary would emerge showing her true vile nature but I'm starting to wonder if that tape doesn't exist.

Tipping point for me was when FBIanon said it'll start Nov 1st 11AM.
Sure enough FBI vault starts tweeting Clinton docs Nov 1st 11 AM.

[ElNono]

i sort of been following this for awhile and it's definetly fascinating, even if it turns out to simply be a mind . If this is true then the corruption is far worse than we can imagine and bigger than Shillary.
There was another 4chan post recently that wasn't part of your boy's archives but it said something similar. It also mentioned how a tape of Shillary would emerge showing her true vile nature but I'm starting to wonder if that tape doesn't exist.

Mah niglet, tell me you're not this naive

Everything is for sale in government, tbh... been that way for many, many years...

[ElNono]

Score another one for FBIanon

Wednesday night, the house is still there.... score another one for?

[TheSanityAnnex]

Wednesday night, the house is still there.... score another one for?

Mah niglet, tell me your not this impatient

[HI-FI]

Mah niglet, tell me you're not this naive

Everything is for sale in government, tbh... been that way for many, many years...

Trust me, I've assumed the worst from government for a long time but even those FBIanon threads shocked me, if they're true.

[ElNono]

Mah niglet, tell me your not this impatient

clock's ticking, brah... if she wins the election, she's going to have the "people's will" backing her up, still own the DOJ and if they nail the senate too, at least a couple years before any impeachment...