Reply With Quote
Kinda like how the Clinton Foundation somehow was able to control funds from OTHER nonprofits in Haiti and then awarding their donors with contracts that were over budget and under fulfilled?
So you're saying you don't care if Trump's a pedophile because Bill was alleged to have been one too?
Kinda like how the Clinton Foundation somehow was able to control funds from OTHER nonprofits in Haiti and then awarding their donors with contracts that were over budget and under fulfilled?
Didn't RG say " Bill Clinton" like 10 posts up?
Don't deflect. I want to know why you support a party that has already placed a sexual predator in there and he is about to return to that position and you are aghast at "allegations" that come in under shady cir stances and timing, but when Comey reopens the much more important email thing that you and your ilk always try to trivialize and downplay, you call it shady timing and a waste of time. But when Comey played his role to pander to the Left, you and your ilk were fine with it because it benefited your position. So, again more double standards here.
So again, I ask, how do you feel about Bill Clinton being a sexual predator? I want a good understanding on the typical Leftwits psyche to see if I can understand why a group of people can be so selectively hypocritical. Don't deflect or employ any of your typical Leftist denial. Answer the question: why are you ok with one sexual predator having been our President and are ok with him returning to the White House, where he will continue to molest, and aren't OK with someone who isn't even proven to be
And let us not forget the main hypocrisy of "Oh, that person isn't credible, they are a Repug plant." But yet, random timed, 20 year old sexual allegation lawsuits come out and we should believe them? LO ingL.
Are you employed by the Clinton campaign/DNC or are you just following their strategy of your own accord?
It would be weird if you thought posting on ST actually affected the election.
We wouldn't know about Trump, since he can't be bothered to reveal what has been expected of any other candidate for the White House. And the idea that there might be something like that in Trump's past isn't that far-fetched, since recent reporting (which hasn't been refuted, but simply denounced as biased) has certainly brought the legalities of the ways in which Trump has used his foundation into some question.
Somehow, even though you'd be screaming and yelling if Hillary had taken that approach, Trump supporters see that evasion as charming.
thats what i said. i see an initial status conference, not a trial date.
NO! He is just a wit LeftWingNut spreading Left propaganda that is more smoke and mirrors from the disgusting Leftwits to continue their mental conditioning since they are dumber than ing dogs.
It's just more garbage from no-name liberal propagandists. Blahblahblah... *post some ty liberal click bait trap story and tell repeat this post 10,000 times filled with obvious hypocrisy and double standards and small-child-scream-arguing*
/ gy boutons mode
"Why would he have sex with a 13 year old girl to start with?"
sweet, tight pussy, pedophilia is widespread behaviour. Your imagination is terribly defunct.
"Why did she wait until a month before the election to make the accusation?"
Like the other women who came forward against Cosby after the first one did, she assumed nobody would believe her against power, wealthy man. When she heard all the from women, she decided she had to speak up about being raped.
CC!Your boy Trash is pure garbage, in every aspect of his life that has been exposed.
Please answer my original question; why are you ok defending a party that put a sexual predator in the White House, as is PROVEN, and supporting his wife, who will bring her meal ticket with her back to the White House, via rigged election, and you dare indict someone based on shoddy cir stances and convenient timed sham lawsuits with zero shred of evidence?
Please help me understand the Great Leftist Hypocrisy and why you and your ilk think ONLY you can be hypocrites and judges of moral fiber.
"Why would he have sex with a 13 year old girl to start with?"
sweet, tight pussy, pedophilia is widespread behaviour. Your imagination is terribly defunct.
"Why did she wait until a month before the election to make the accusation?"
Like the other women who came forward against Cosby after the first one did, she assumed nobody would believe her against power, wealthy man. When she heard all the from women, she decided she had to speak up about being raped.
CC!
You're indicting a man with ZERO evidence, you disgusting deplorable Leftwit hate monger. You're everything you claim to hate about Trump. Disgusting, hypocritical racist.
I didn't say any of those things about Comey, and if you want to talk about double standards, I'd say Comey has readily exposed the double standards on both sides. When he wouldn't prosecute Clinton, the Right screamed that he was a shill for the Left and was corrupt; when he offered a vague letter to Congress closer to the election, the Left sung praises of his character and commitment to the sanc y of the FBI's role in our government.
And for the record, I support the party of Hillary Clinton because it's defined by things and people other just than Bill and Hillary Clinton.
I think Bill Clinton is a de able person who was a mostly very effective President. But if we had the record on him that we have on Trump, I wouldn't have voted for him (and, in fact, while I voted in 1992, I didn't vote for Bill Clinton in the general election). I'm okay with Bill Clinton returning to the White House -- as First Dude, or whatever we'll call him -- because I believe in the policies that his wife supports and wants to enact for this country. I support electing Hillary Clinton because the rhetoric of Trump and his supporters is ridiculously divisive and threatens a social climate in this country that I don't want for my children. I support electing Hillary Clinton because I don't think the only part of the Cons ution that matters is the Second Amendment. And I support electing Hillary Clinton because I also happen to think that electing the alternative is electing a charlatan who likely is also a sexual predator who may also have assaulted young girls.So again, I ask, how do you feel about Bill Clinton being a sexual predator? I want a good understanding on the typical Leftwits psyche to see if I can understand why a group of people can be so selectively hypocritical. Don't deflect or employ any of your typical Leftist denial. Answer the question: why are you ok with one sexual predator having been our President and are ok with him returning to the White House, where he will continue to molest, and aren't OK with someone who isn't even proven to be
It helps to put analysis behind such claims. I was piggybacking off FWD. You are just mindlessly for tatting. It reeks of guilt.
The OP said court date.
and post #3 said trial date
Alright so now you have won a point of fact. Does it make any difference whatsoever?
Fuzz, I've told you before- you are not as smart as you think. No matter how well you write and speak the language doesn't change the fact the points you attempt to make are always never made. Work on your self-awareness and the fact you've casted your lot with a bunch of elitist pigs that happen to work as slave masters and agents of the bankers that own them. Congrats, you are the establishment and support them 100%. I'm sorry you're a moral degenerate, there is no need to pretend you're intelligent enough to be condescending to me.
It does. Because you're wrong. Again. Per par with Liberals.
Cool story. Who said anything about how smart I am? Only one bringing it up is you. You guys certainly are worried that I think that I am smart though. Reeks of an inferiority complex.
Cast my lot? Hardly. I reject the dem leadership outside of Warren. I just choose Hillary over Trump. That is the extent of it.
And again what substantive difference does it make or are you just interested in scoring points like a simpleton?
No, let's talk about false rape accusations. Let's talk about the investigation the Guardian did into these specific allegations against Trump, it was only linked in your own article.
"A Guardian investigation this summer found that the lawsuit appeared to have been coordinated by a former producer on the Jerry Springer TV show who has been associated in the past with a range of disputed claims involving celebrities including OJ Simpson and Kurt Cobain. A publicist acting for “Jane Doe” also attempted to sell a video in which the woman describes her allegations against Trump to media outlets at a $1m price tag."
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...its-norm-lubow
Lawsuits accusing Donald Trump of sexually assaulting a child in the 1990s appear to have been orchestrated by an eccentric anti-Trump campaigner with a record of making outlandish claims about celebrities.
Norm Lubow, a former producer on the Jerry Springer TV show, has previously been involved with disputed allegations that OJ Simpson bought illegal drugs on the day Simpson’s wife was murdered, and that Kurt Cobain’s widow had the Nirvana frontman killed.
Statements made by Lubow over the past two decades on a variety of topics have been called into question.
In 2014, using his comic pro-marijuana pseudonym Reverend Bud Green, Lubow claimed to have arranged the replacement of US flags on the Brooklyn Bridge with white flags. The following month, however, German artists came forward with video evidence that they in fact were behind the stunt.
In 1998, guests on Springer’s notoriously wild talkshow alleged that Lubow had encouraged them behind the scenes to stage fights and invent outrageous stories during recordings of the program. The allegation was denied by Lubow and other show staff.
Also in 1998, Lubow appeared wearing a disguisein the controversial do entary film Kurt and Courtney under the name “Jack Briggs” alongside Bowman, the minor Hollywood promoter whose photograph was later used by “Al Taylor” for television interviews. Bowman said “Briggs” was Lubow.
In the film, director Nick Broomfield said Lubow and Bowman had introduced him to Eldon “El Duce” Hoke, a Seattle-based musician who claimed Courtney Love offered him $50,000 to kill her husband Kurt Cobain, the singer and guitarist in the rock band Nirvana. The allegation about Hoke, which became lore among some Nirvana fans following Cobain’s suicide in 1994, was denied by Love.
According to the New York Post, in 1995 Lubow, using the name “Ron X”, also claimed to tabloids that he had sold drugs to OJ Simpson on the day Simpson’s estranged wife Nicole Brown was murdered. Lubow denied the Post’s report.
An attorney brought in to file Katie Johnson’s lawsuit against Trump in New York said any issues around the credibility of “Al Taylor” should not cast doubt on Johnson’s allegations
"Why would he have sex with a 13 year old girl to start with?"
sweet, tight pussy, pedophilia is widespread behaviour. Your imagination is terribly defunct.
"Why did she wait until a month before the election to make the accusation?"
Like the other women who came forward against Cosby after the first one did, she assumed nobody would believe her against power, wealthy man. When she heard all the from women, she decided she had to speak up about being raped.
CC!
Boukaki fantasizes about sweet, tight, 13 year old pussy?????
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
