People about the fact that Parker is on the team, without any consideration for the fact that there is a salary cap, or that most of the better PG's are under contract somewhere else. We've got people suggesting that we trade Parker for Davis, for 's sake, just because the salaries match. So why not at Pop for not trading Parker for Curry and Pachulia? Those salaries match.
So maybe... maybe Pop is influenced by the past with Parker. But that only goes so far. He's not a complete ing moron. These comments that a bunch of casual, limp- armchair fans are seeing something so obvious, and Pop can't see it at all? Sorry if I question that. The guy is trying to put together a lineup, top to bottom. He's got the players he's got.
I don't know what the the guy is thinking sometimes. I already said that I wish he had put Lap or even Forbes into that Utah game. But this horse that Pop cost every Championship that they didn't win in the Duncan era is, well, horse .