Reply With Quote
Can't wait till he stat pads against a lottery teamPatty was atrocious....dear god.
We don't have a point.
Tony does the best job at it but it's not good enough. Putting Patty at the position is not fair to the player. Anyone going against Paul is going to look bad on our team if they have to guard him and play point. Bad matchup.
Can't wait till he stat pads against a lottery team
Anyone still thinking Porker is an NBA player.
Guess you missed the 2015 Playoffs.
Patty is probably the best backup PG in the NBA, but he doesn't have the necessarily skills to be a starting PG, tbh..he's perfect as a bench gunner that can play with the starting unit for stretches in good matchups..
Currently, the Spurs have a great backup PG(Patty) and possibly another decent backup PG in Tony if he could fit with the bench unit and/or accept a backup role..unfortunately, having 2 PGs that are better suited for bench roles is pointless
Patty is probably the best backup PG in the NBA, but he doesn't have the necessarily skills to be a starting PG, tbh..he's perfect as a bench gunner that can play with the starting unit for stretches in good matchups..
Currently, the Spurs have a great backup PG(Patty) and possibly another decent backup PG in Tony if he could fit with the bench unit and/or accept a backup role..unfortunately, having 2 PGs that are better suited for bench roles is pointless
The gimp wii be back shortly
Spurs need to get CP3. Dude is a monster.Patty is probably the best backup PG in the NBA, but he doesn't have the necessarily skills to be a starting PG, tbh..he's perfect as a bench gunner that can play with the starting unit for stretches in good matchups..
Currently, the Spurs have a great backup PG(Patty) and possibly another nice backup PG in Tony if he could fit with the bench unit and/or accept a backup role..unfortunately, having 2 quality backup PGs is pointless
Also, when you compare Patty and Porker. It's a no brainer who is the better player/starting PG.
Yep..would be interesting, as his game should age very well, but kind of risky to bank on a player in his 30s(especially since Aldridge is the same age)..
Aldridge would benefit the most from this actually. He would get open jumpers all day from his sweet spot and would be 3rd banana. I'm not saying LMA cannot be 2nd banana, just saying in the future he would be best for this role.
Spurs not wining anything this year without a credible starting PG.. CP3 or bust..
If Porker played, we'd have beaten the Spurs by 40, tbh.
Spurs would have to show a lot more than they did tonight to entice CP3 to jump from the Clips to the team they just trounced.
Lol Mills as a starting PG.
I think he's fine in the SL, tbh, at least until LDN comes back... he's going to struggle defensively against top of the line PGs, but that's going to happen to every PG on the team right now.Patty is probably the best backup PG in the NBA, but he doesn't have the necessarily skills to be a starting PG, tbh..he's perfect as a bench gunner that can play with the starting unit for stretches in good matchups..
Currently, the Spurs have a great backup PG(Patty) and possibly another decent backup PG in Tony if he could fit with the bench unit and/or accept a backup role..unfortunately, having 2 PGs that are better suited for bench roles is pointless
Wish he was a bit more consistent with his shooting and picking his spots though. He can look like a million dollar one night, and kinda lost the next.
patty is currently #1 in assist to turnover ratio. parker doesn't crack top 20.
patty is also 20th in TS%.
OP.
Starting Patty puts this team's ceiling at .500
Patty is.
As long as KL carries a larger load with the ball in his hands. Do you want that? Do you ant KL initiating the offense? I want it on big possessions, near the end of quarters, and the last part of the game.
Parker is more elusive with the ball than any guard on our team. He does get room. There is a reason Patty gets forced into taking tougher shots than Parker when he handles the ball as a point should. Now if Parker could just get those horribly easy jumpers to go... The D moves up, he gets an easier dish to guys like Aldridge. The threat for a layup off the dribble is too much to ask for any so called point on our team for the moment.
Fact. We don't have a decent point. Parker sitting has not allowed any one player to rise yet. We need all the help we cab get at this position. He will sit longer so maybe something happens. Simmons has shown flashes of being able to help at a non point position which is good.
Spurs look better with parker tbh
Spurs look better doing commercials, and even those aren't great this year.
parker as a starter: 5.5 points, 4 assists
patty as a starter: 11.5 points, 5.8 assists
Parker as starter... Spurs 4-1
Mills as starter... 1-2
if parker played against the clippers he wouldn't have been guarding blake griffin.
and the houston game was a tip in away from going into overtime.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
