LOL strike is over
So I'm guessing this Axl Rose character is a Deadly Dynasty alt?
Nah DD is pretty funny, it's m>s.
That makes more sense. I thought m>s had only the Dirk Oneanddoneski alt
LOL the quest for foreskin continues.
Not m>s
but . Still doesn't change the fact that you all are sitting around like cucks hoping the blacks will do the job for you.
Philly is lit tonight. Ya'll seeing this ?
For ducks since he likes to post like this. For you baby girl.
But but nobody never shows up for her rally's tho. Lol
I never said it wasn't empirical?
2016’s Election Data Hero Isn’t Nate Silver. It’s Sam Wang
When the smoke clears on Tuesday—and it will clear—what will emerge is Wang and his Princeton Election Consortium website and calculations (which have been used, in part, to drive some of the election poll conclusions at The New York Times’Upshot blogand The Huffington Post’s election site).
What will be vindicated is precisely the sort of math approach that Silver once rode to fame and fortune.
Wang says his method differs from Silver’s in its approach to uncertainty.
This year, Wang called the election at 8:55 PM on October 18. He promised to eat more than just his hat if Clinton loses:
“It is totally over. If Trump wins more than 240 electoral votes, I will eat a bug,”
Wang tweeted to his 23,000 followers.
He expects Clinton to receive at least 298 electoral votes.
Wang has been the intrepid election data explorer furthest out this election cycle, never once wavering from his certainty of a Clinton win. The only real uncertainty left on Tuesday, he said, is how many people show up to vote. But even that doesn’t change the presidential election outcome.
“Pollsters have pretty good judgment, but their average estimate of who will vote may be off,” Wang told me. “To account for this, the snapshot gets converted to a Meta-Margin, which is defined as how far all polls would have to move, in the same direction, to create a perfect toss-up. To turn the Meta-margin into a win probability, the final step is to estimate how likely it is that the Meta-Margin is so far off that the other candidate is favored.”
Even if you factor this voting uncertainty into his election model by 5 percent—which is an unprecedented level historically, Wang says—Clinton still wins.
https://www.wired.com/2016/11/2016s-election-data-hero-isnt-nate-silver-sam-wang/
For ducks since he likes to post like this. For you baby girl.
Concerts draw crowds? Who knew?
I hear occasional booing.
Then clean your ears dude. The president is speaking.Concerts draw crowds? Who knew?
I hear occasional booing.
Did all those people show up to hear Hillary?
Of course. Just like all the people who showed up to hear Hillary speak and were surprised to see a bonus concert of Jay Z and Beyoncé.Did all those people show up to hear Hillary?
The first Hillary rally I can reacall this year where the camera actually looks at the crowd.
^The butthurt is real.
This corrupt hag is your next president -- so inspiring.
It is sad that we have to choose between two ty candidates.^The butthurt is real.
What I cant wrap my head around more is that she's not winning by more. It will be relatively close. Within 50-60 EVs.
CNN and MSNBC forgoing their usual shows just to livestream the Philly event in its entirety.
Says a lot. People don't like her. The only thing that helps her is an even more hated candidate on the other side.
Oh well, back to MNF.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote