Reply With Quote
It's not good tbh
Just curious..
It's not good tbh
Mills has been fine..
its the fact that with Parker out, the spurs is forced to play some dude who barely looks like he belong in the NBA D-league.
You talking about the Playoffs?
Pretty good.
2014 OKC.
Same as it would be if he played tbh
Spurs fans are at a loss when they don't have Parker to blame
How about game 7 finals when he the bed and missed every shot until the pressure was off then had a nice stat padYou talking about the Playoffs?
Pretty good.
2014 OKC.
Spurs CLEARLY missing the head of the snake. Aren't even a .500 team without him.
What the do these armchair GM's know tbh
Parker has regressed considerably but the drop off defensively to Mills is noticable and the overall drop off to Nico is huge.
http://stats.nba.com/league/lineups/...mID=1610612759
Our two best line ups feature a certain PG
This... really need to move on from him if Murray grows at all this year.
the idiots on this board
I didn't say Murray is playing tomorrow. Or in three months. But Nico obviously doesn't belong on an NBA roster and is a placeholder until Murray is ready.
I'd rather go no PG and watch Simmons get torched than Nico get torched.
Murray is a couple years away from being 3rd string caliber.
Whatever they paid Parker, it wasn't ing enough tbh
So he's a a year away from being a year away?
Exactly.
Parker is struggling and all but he is 10 times better than lapro dude... Patty is doing fine but we need two PGs in a rotation, with Parker out we have one.
Also a dude that is struggling without him is Aldridge tbh, Parker just spoon feed him on offense pretty much all the time
We need paler back, but I think Patty should play more minutes.
Lottery-bound. Now maybe people can start to understand why Parker is the winningest player in NBA history (minimum 1,000 games).
The team is - 8/ per 100 possessions offensively and +20/ per 100 possessions defensively with Parker on the floor.
Parker is 13th on the team in BPM at a net negative - 4.7 ( Terrible).
Parker has a PER of 5.16
He's avg. 5.5 points on 33% shooting.
You can't get much worse than that.
People have no idea how much easier the "simple" things are in a very difficult position. Patty doing fine is not good enough because he needs to play what he does best. KL wasting his time setting up the offense is not good enough. The opposition cannot play right on top of an Parker, even when he is injured. Parker is given some space at least. He is not crowded into the fetal position.
Parker will supply the necessary ball handling to get to the playoffs. Then we hope for a rash of injuries and misfortunes of opponents. Get Green and KL together on the wings with Parker at the point and we might get a stop on occasion. At the end of the game play whoever has been performering (given that matchup) at point.
Even with the Spurs, pg is a very difficult position night after night, especially once the opposition learn they can play up in your nostrils. This is the NBA, very few people, even with great athletic ability, just walk on the court and become point night after night without eventually getting exposed. Krew don't get it. Never have.
Yes you can.
You can lose games... When you have players that hide and get no stats when put in a difficult position.
You can lose Many games when you don't have a pg.
The first stat you go to is W//L.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
