Reply With Quote
but HarlemHeat37 why did you go back through the archives to delete your posts about aldridge?
but HarlemHeat37 why did you go back through the archives to delete your posts about aldridge?
Did he really?
yeah its pretty hilarious. you can still see his posts because people quoted them, but when you try to click back to his original post... whoops! knowing him there are probably others that he deleted before anybody quoted themDid he really?
dude admitted to being wrong about aldridge. but then once aldridge performed poorly at the end of the OKC series, he scurried back to delete that admission so he could pretend to have been right the entire time
here bro, no altered image here.
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post8476261
please, show me the post that he's quoting you in... when i click your post, page not found
or this one (two different people quoted it)
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post8487607
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post8487627
you're disgusting, tbh
Philoleaks
You need your own thread: Philoleaks today
Um, no..those posts were accepting defeat after I predicted Aldridge wouldn't show up in game 1, actually, which I gladly admitted..yeah its pretty hilarious. you can still see his posts because people quoted them, but when you try to click back to his original post... whoops! knowing him there are probably others that he deleted before anybody quoted them
dude admitted to being wrong about aldridge. but then once aldridge performed poorly at the end of the OKC series, he scurried back to delete that admission so he could pretend to have been right the entire time
I would never change my mind on something I adamantly argued for in a 60 page thread
referring to posts you deleted? if not, please link me to those posts
i find your story unlikely considering those people were quoting you in march, way before the playoffs
What a sad son of a . Times like these almost make me feel bad for gots like him and apayeah its pretty hilarious. you can still see his posts because people quoted them, but when you try to click back to his original post... whoops! knowing him there are probably others that he deleted before anybody quoted them
dude admitted to being wrong about aldridge. but then once aldridge performed poorly at the end of the OKC series, he scurried back to delete that admission so he could pretend to have been right the entire time
Wait, you're quoting posts from March?referring to posts you deleted? if not, please link me to those posts
i find your story unlikely considering those people were quoting you in march, way before the playoffsIIRC, I predicted Aldridge wouldn't perform poorly for that specific March game, and then I admitted I was wrong, because he did show up..
I did admit I was wrong that Aldridge wouldn't show up in game 1 and other posters quoted me, though IIRC..
you care. you cared enough to go back and delete them months laterWait, you're quoting posts from March?
you remembered well enough to go back and delete them months later..I don't even remember the context of those posts..
I did admit I was wrong that Aldridge wouldn't show up in game 1 and other posters quoted me, though IIRC..
Philo "Trey" Gowdy tbh
I frequently delete my posts in threads, I can cite hundreds of examplesyou care. you cared enough to go back and delete them months later
you remembered well enough to go back and delete them months later
This is quite the reach..
Spurraider: 2 pro-Aldridge posts without proof of context
Harlem: 60 pages of anti-Aldridge proof in the same thread
despise gowdy, mainly since he replaced bob inglis
excellent progress, just the other day you denied this. cool beansI frequently delete my posts in threads, I can cite hundreds of examples
this is like donald trump saying the media is being mean to him when they're replaying his own words and statements back at him
IIRC, I predicted Aldridge wouldn't show up vs. OKC in a March home game, since he had struggled vs. good teams for most of the season..he proved me wrong and I took the L..that's all it was, yet this is trying to run with it
It was a March 12th game, and I made the post on March 12..those posters quoted me on March 13th..
Case closed
I didn't click your links, at the time, obviously..now that I did, your argument is even tierexcellent progress, just the other day you denied this. cool beans
this is like donald trump saying the media is being mean to him when they're replaying his own words and statements back at him
it's ok bro your e-rep will be fine. it's only a matter of time until apa and dabom login and start fondling your e-balls
I like Gowdy so far, I think he'll land a position higher up pretty soon.
To be fair, even when Aldridge destroyed OKC in those first two games of the series, Harlem still cautioned against "Homedridge" blowing his load..the rest is history
No, I didn't disagree with you. I believe you despise Gowdy. Philo would be me saying "no you don't".
It was a commendable attempt, tbh..pretty stupid to think that somebody would change their entire stance over a meaningless RS game, but still, nice attempt
Between this and the way the Clippers' defense and bench have looked this season, all I can say is: who is this Doc Rivers and what has he done with the old, dumb, stubborn Doc that we're used to?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
