Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 49 of 49
  1. #26
    selbstverständlich Agloco's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    9,019
    so based on his recommendation, darrin would suck in a club to pay off his student loans had he graduated now?

  2. #27
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    if you've ever been to North Dakota you'd know why there no one wants to live there...but I offer them Rickybobby...
    Probably not a lot oh 9/11 twoofers there, huh?

  3. #28
    Alleged Michigander ChumpDumper's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Post Count
    154,411
    Probably not a lot oh 9/11 twoofers there, huh?
    Likely more than a few birthers.

  4. #29
    Spur-taaaa TDMVPDPOY's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Post Count
    41,384
    mining towns are horse , with all that salary etc, ppl must take into equation living standards and cost of living of living up there...rent is the biggest budget killer...

    usa only importing half....lol when was iraq a state of the usa?

  5. #30
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    mining towns are horse , with all that salary etc, ppl must take into equation living standards and cost of living of living up there...rent is the biggest budget killer...

    usa only importing half....lol when was iraq a state of the usa?
    Lol -- we import most of our oil from Canada and Mexico.

  6. #31
    Independent DMX7's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    22,149
    I heard about how people are miserable there.

  7. #32
    W4A1 143 43CK? Nbadan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Post Count
    32,408
    It's freaking cold and miserable.... but on the bright side....Darrin finally admitted that the economy is growing......stimulus - it works!

  8. #33
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    mining towns are horse , with all that salary etc, ppl must take into equation living standards and cost of living of living up there...rent is the biggest budget killer...

    usa only importing half....lol when was iraq a state of the usa?


    Rent, shment. Easy to own. , get it shipped there.

  9. #34
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    Lol -- we import most of our oil from Canada and Mexico.
    Top 5 crude sources in order:

    CANADA
    SAUDI ARABIA
    MEXICO
    VENEZUELA
    NIGERIA
    IRAQ
    http://205.254.135.24/pub/oil_gas/pe...nt/import.html

    Canada and Mexico together do not comprise "most" of our oil (36%). To break the 50% mark you have to add Saudi and Venezualan oil. Together the first four comprise 58% of our crude imports.

    Total petroleum imports roughly correspond to the crude figures, with a bit more weighting given to Canada.

  10. #35
    Veteran DarrinS's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    42,561
    Top 5 crude sources in order:

    CANADA
    SAUDI ARABIA
    MEXICO
    VENEZUELA
    NIGERIA
    IRAQ
    http://205.254.135.24/pub/oil_gas/pe...nt/import.html

    Canada and Mexico together do not comprise "most" of our oil (36%). To break the 50% mark you have to add Saudi and Venezualan oil. Together the first four comprise 58% of our crude imports.

    Total petroleum imports roughly correspond to the crude figures, with a bit more weighting given to Canada.

    I stand corrected. Would you agree that we get more oil from non-OPEC countries and that we get far more oil from Canada than we do Iraq?

  11. #36
    I am that guy RandomGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Post Count
    51,121
    I stand corrected. Would you agree that we get more oil from non-OPEC countries and that we get far more oil from Canada than we do Iraq?
    Yup. I would say that is accurate.

    Canada looks to provide even more once some infrastructure projects come online to get the tar sands oil down here.

    Those sources of oil have become much more profitable with the recent natural gas boom.

    Still not quite the bonanza that the guys selling the projects perenially claim, but better.

    I am not sure how much more ecological damage Canada will tolerate to get at those sand oils, and that is a big factor in the ultimate amount/rate of oil extracted.

  12. #37
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,940

  13. #38
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,940
    The Morton County Sheriff's Department said 300 protesters trespassed on private property and "engaged in escalated unlawful tactics and behavior" at a spot three miles west of State Highway 1806, along the pipeline right-of-way.
    http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/22/us/dak...eline-arrests/

  14. #39
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,940
    same company is building the TPL pipeline in West Texas:

    http://therivardreport.com/bulldozin...exas-frontier/

  15. #40
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,940
    Almost exactly 20 years ago, President Bill Clinton signed into law a bill creating an interstate agreement for emergency management. That incon uous law has opened the door for the current flood of out-of-state law enforcement agents present at the continuing protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) in North Dakota
    http://www.desmogblog.com/2016/10/27...out-state-cops

  16. #41
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,940
    weird stuff. odd that this isn't getting more coverage.

    The man who North Dakota authorities had said was shot by Dakota Access Pipeline protesters was actually an armed instigator linked to the pipeline company, Standing Rock Sioux tribe members said Friday.

    The sheriff’s office, which said Thursday the man was shot in one of two incidents involving gunfire during tumultuous protests against the pipeline, backpedaled on Friday and said the man wasn’t shot.


    The conflicting new claims called into question accounts of Thursday’s chaotic demonstration, in which 142 people were arrested as police in riot gear removed protesters from an encampment blocking the pipeline’s path.


    The Standing Rock Sioux tribe claimed Friday that the supposed shooting victim drove a truck through a highway barricade set up by protesters, who gave chase and forced him off the road. He then got out of the vehicle and “fired several shots from his assault rifle,” the tribe said in a statement posted to Facebook.


    Bureau of Indian Affairs agents detained the man, whose name has not been released, and turned him over to the FBI, according to BIA spokeswoman Nedra Darling. The FBI did not respond to The Huffington Post’s inquiries.
    Do ents found in the man’s Chevy Silverado pickup suggest he was a Dakota Access Pipeline security guard in a company-owned truck, the Standing Rock Sioux statement said. The tribe posted photos of insurance papers linking the vehicle to the pipeline. Mother Jones reported there was an employee ID badge in the pickup. Protesters later set the vehicle on fire, according to Mother Jones.


    Morton County Sheriff Kyle Kirchmeier on Friday said the man, a contractor providing security, was indeed armed, but “that was more or less in self defense.” The man fired no shots, Kirchmeier said during a press conference, and was not wounded by gunfire.
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/...b064e1b4b28f41

  17. #42
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,940
    “I used to think there was no rational argument for civilian possession of military-style weapons. But in light of the disparate treatment of the armed Malheur National Wildlife Refuge occupiers (who were acquitted of all charges Friday) and the protesters in North Dakota supporting the Standing Rock Sioux Reservation in its fight against construction of an oil pipeline, it’s apparent that such weapons are now an effective component of the protester’s toolkit”

  18. #43
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ TheSanityAnnex's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,376
    Terrible comparison trying to equate the two.

    Malhuer
    peaceful despite 7 FBI informants inside, some actively involved in takeover. FBI shoots and kills protester, lies and tries to cover up.

    North Dakota
    not peaceful. Protester shoots at law enforcement.


    And I support both parties protests, but this letter to the editor is just stupid.

  19. #44
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,940
    Seems pretty straightforward to me. I thought you'd like the pro-gun angle.

  20. #45
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ TheSanityAnnex's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,376
    Seems pretty straightforward to me. I thought you'd like the pro-gun angle.
    Had nothing to do with guns. One protest was peaceful and one wasn't. And I feel for the Dakota protesters more.

  21. #46
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Trump and his key advisors stand to profit from the Dakota Access Pipeline


    • Trump has personally invested between $500,000 and $1 million in Energy Transfer Partners — the very same company that’s constructing the pipeline.
    • Trump has an additional $500,000 to $1 million holding in Phillips 66, which would have a 25 percent stake in the completed Dakota Access project.
    • Energy Transfer Partners Chief Executive Kelcy Warren donated $103,000 toward Trump’s campaign and a further $66,800 to the Republican National Committee after he became the party nominee.
    • Harold Hamm, a top Trump campaign advisor and leading candidate for energy secretary, is the CEO of Continental Resources, whose oil would be carried through the Dakota Access Pipeline.
    • John Paulson, another campaign advisor, is heavily invested in the Bakken oil and gas industry. And that’s just the start for fossil fuel connections on Trump’s team.


    The day following Trump’s victory, the stock value of Energy Transfer’s parent company surged 15 percent as the pipeline’s future went from uncertain to a sure bet. The project was 84 percent complete as of Thursday and could be green-lighted by Obama even before Trump’s inauguration.

    http://www.rawstory.com/2016/11/trum...e+Raw+Story%29



  22. #47
    Veteran SpursforSix's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    21,159
    Trump and his key advisors stand to profit from the Dakota Access Pipeline


    • Trump has personally invested between $500,000 and $1 million in Energy Transfer Partners — the very same company that’s constructing the pipeline.
    • Trump has an additional $500,000 to $1 million holding in Phillips 66, which would have a 25 percent stake in the completed Dakota Access project.
    • Energy Transfer Partners Chief Executive Kelcy Warren donated $103,000 toward Trump’s campaign and a further $66,800 to the Republican National Committee after he became the party nominee.
    • Harold Hamm, a top Trump campaign advisor and leading candidate for energy secretary, is the CEO of Continental Resources, whose oil would be carried through the Dakota Access Pipeline.
    • John Paulson, another campaign advisor, is heavily invested in the Bakken oil and gas industry. And that’s just the start for fossil fuel connections on Trump’s team.


    The day following Trump’s victory, the stock value of Energy Transfer’s parent company surged 15 percent as the pipeline’s future went from uncertain to a sure bet. The project was 84 percent complete as of Thursday and could be green-lighted by Obama even before Trump’s inauguration.

    http://www.rawstory.com/2016/11/trum...e+Raw+Story%29


    holy !!!! Trump has a whole $2,000,000 invested??!??! He must own like half of Phillips and Energy Transfer Partners. Thank god the pipeline will be built or those companies would have gone bankrupt.

  23. #48
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    btw, the reason the pipeline Sky People moved the pipeline away from Bismarck and into Indian sacred grounds was that they feared the pipeline would pollute Bismarck's water.

  24. #49
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,136
    btw, the reason the pipeline Sky People moved the pipeline away from Bismarck and into Indian sacred grounds was that they feared the pipeline would pollute Bismarck's water.
    The pipeline doesn't cross tribal land. There are already 8 other pipelines that cross the river.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •