Reply With Quote
Trump's father was only modestly successful by comparison. Donald doesn't seem to have any significant daddy issues; if his brother did, that's another story.
They all are, in their own ways. Mitt has lots of messed up ideas but he's the best of the lot. McCain thinks he's honorable but really he's a weasel. Bush is a dummy who lead us into ruin that took years to fix. Trump is by far one of the worst personalities to ever run for president, not to mention actually get elected. He's an impulsive, incurious buffoon with conflicts of interest out his ass.
Trump's father was only modestly successful by comparison. Donald doesn't seem to have any significant daddy issues; if his brother did, that's another story.
Conflicts of interest? The Clintons were in the process of turning the govt. into their own personal thiefdom. I won't defend Trump to the hilt. Maybe, he'll end up being like a run of the mill politician in the end; signs point to that. Mitt was soft and unsure of himself; and that ultimately cost him as a campaigner. As an admin he had a lot to offer. Dubya and McCain along with the Clintons represent the treasonous elite as far as I'm concerned.
Yeah because Paris climate agreement, trades deal, NATO changes and globale USA foreign policy doesn't matter for the rest of the World
And like we have seen in 08' with the subprime crisis, an internal US economic crisis doesn't affect the rest of the world economy for years
look at this got tbh...
this cowboy dude is your average joe who voted for Trump tbh... just some poorly educated idiots
I haven't found one to back the cigarrets don't kill
Really, dude. Please explain to me in a mathematical equation that proves this data to be accurate. I have never seen one posting from NASA proving otherwise. 400,000 years ago. Just 1,000 years ago the world was in the dark ages. I have studied Quantum Physics in college just for the uva it b/c I love physics. This is all THEORIES. Really a in machine is going to tell you want happen 400,000 years ago. My in' goodness. Slap a le on someone and all of a sudden they know what happen 100,000 to millions of years ago. Man, you guys are really showing your ignorance.
I haven't found one to back the cigarrets don't kill
but but we don't know what will happen in the future
Did I just read that global warming, the last ice age and the Chicxulub meteor ( really? a 'meteor' is something else, it's an asteroid ffs ) were all made up? FFS Spurstalk! Should have stayed down, tbh
it, i dont have class for a few hours, i can get through a few of these
thats because they take temperatures from across the globe, not just individual cities. buoys across the ocean, inhabited cities as well as uninhabited lands. the theory on climate change isn't called "Atlanta Warming"... it's global.
but WHY is it a load of crock? do you have evidence to back this claim, or is it just something you believe because it sounds right?GLOBAL WARMING is a load of crock. Urban warming, well , what do you expect. EPA has so many regulations nowadays that carbon emissions is less than half than what was 50 plus year ago. But the Earth keeps on getting warmer. We all are going to have to wear in space suits just to walk outside in a few years.
and where's your evidence that carbon emissions are "less than half than what was 50 plus years ago?" Please, i'm eager to learn, and i'm open to changing my opinion with new information. Please show me where global CO2 emissions are less than half of what they were 50 years ago. Because the data I've looked up says otherwise...
http://www.c2es.org/facts-figures/in...ons/historical
but having a deficit isn't the same as saying "the economy isn't improving"... the deficit and national debt both went up dramatically (relative to the figures then) when reagan took over in office, but the economy also improved from the late carter years. the two aren't mutually exclusive. an economy "recovering" from recession just means that the GDP goes up instead of down, which isn't necessarily the same as the deficit going down.
do you know how they collect data from 400k years ago? seriously. do you know how they get that data? or do you think a computer just makes guesses and projections?
you can dig in the earth and find a fossil from hundreds of thousands of years ago. that doesn't mean you traveled back in time hundreds of thousands of years. If you want to know how they collect old atmospheric data, ask or look it up.
i don't think you know what the word theory means, at least in the scientific context, or the difference between "law" and "theory" in the scientific context. Do you believe in plate tectonics? Because that's the plate tectonics theory, not the law of plate tectonics. In science, theories don't get "promoted" to laws when they're good or truthful enough. A scientific law is something that can be boiled down to a mathematical expression. Heck, Newton's "law of universal gravitation" was proven wrong and replaced by Einstein's "theory of general relativity"
the contention that a scientific law is more advanced or better proven version of a scientific theory is just, well... indicating a lack of understanding about those terms. again, if you want to know what the word "theory" means (in the context of science), feel free to ask or to look it up
also, nasa and scientists are well aware of recent ice ages and have data evidence that explains how the ice ages occurred, and how the earth was able to warm out of ice ages. these aren't things that have "stumped" scientists. it's the very scientists you speak of that made these discoveries in the first place
Temperatures from Across the Global. Just because we have the instruments to evaluate change in weather patterns, doesn't prove the Earth has been warming up for the past 400,000 years.
Carbon emission from factories have decreased in the US and Europe. The chart your showing is across the world. China, India and Asian nation's are like 1930's America. London use to have a constant fog because of the pollution. Now it doesn't. What changed. Cleaner emissions. Now Chinese cities are a cloud smoke. Why are people still wearing clothes to keep warm. Wouldn't it be hot as with all that Carbon emission. Global Warming will happen but it's not so drastic that it going to melt the Earth.
Deficit went up with Reagan b/c America put a load of money in our military defense to break the Soviet Union. It WORKED. Obama, it is entirely different. Bailouts, giving monies to countries that are enemies, giving in' handouts left and right. These are reason why Trump got elected. I didn't vote. But listen to people and this is reason even Democrats voted for Trump.
A computer makes guesses. A COMPUTER. A man made object set to calculate parameters set by MEN. Computers can make physical observations dumbass. They only can assess data. And guess what, we have ABSOLUTELY ZERO physical data from 400,000 years ago. ABSOLUTELY NONE. You can take today's geographical and know what happen 400,000 years ago even with the most advance computer b/c it's not in the same period or time frame. It's PROJECTING, which means its not fact, it's just an educated guess. Fossils data can be altered and manipulated by nature over time. There absolutely no in way to tell HOW OLD they are. It's like those idiots that purposely but a fresh human skeleton at a dig site and these scientist said it was 1,000 years old by these computers you put your faith in.
I love you bring of the THEORY of Relativity. THese reason it's a THEORY and not scientific fact is because you cannot physically observe it. That it is not the Law of Relativity, like the Law of Thermodynamics, the Law of Gravity, etc. It's ALL THEORIES AND PROJECTIONS, NOT FACT. That is the difference between scientist today and yesterday, is the latter stated their findings as Theories. Even Darwin labeled it the Theory of Evolution. Today's scientist try to pass off theories as facts and idiots like you believe it just because it's in a textbook.
Law of Gravity still applies in physics. It was not replace by the laws of Relativity. Einstein just expounded on Newton's laws. Dude, go read a physics book. Theories are Theories because they cannot be PHYSICALLY OBSERVED. It has nothing to do with mathematics. It's everything about physically observing. AND NO IN HUMAN BEING has observed what happened 100 millions of years ago no less 400,000 years ago. That is why these PROJECTED findings will ALWAYS BE THEORIES. But by all means, but your faith in this.
These guys are 40-50 years removed from being taking in their pants, breast sucking, cry their heads off babies, and, with the use of COMPUTERS, they really know what happen before any recorded history. Please keep on believing this .
i dont think anybody has claimed the earth has been warming for 400,000 years
of course i'm using a chart that shows emissions across the world. like i said, we are looking at global climate, not regional climate. and fine, lets look at the US. you've made the claim that emissions are less than 50% of what they used to be. while that's absolutely false globally, lets look at the US, which has beenCarbon emission from factories have decreased in the US and Europe. The chart your showing is across the world. China, India and Asian nation's are like 1930's America. London use to have a constant fog because of the pollution. Now it doesn't. What changed. Cleaner emissions. Now Chinese cities are a cloud smoke. Why are people still wearing clothes to keep warm. Wouldn't it be hot as with all that Carbon emission. Global Warming will happen but it's not so drastic that it going to melt the Earth.
i was just pointing out that saying "the economy didnt get better because look at the deficit" isn't really sound. i dont want to get into a big political/economic discussion thoughDeficit went up with Reagan b/c America put a load of money in our military defense to break the Soviet Union. It WORKED. Obama, it is entirely different. Bailouts, giving monies to countries that are enemies, giving in' handouts left and right. These are reason why Trump got elected. I didn't vote. But listen to people and this is reason even Democrats voted for Trump.
well this answered my question that you don't know how they get old atmospheric samples. they aren't projections. they drill into ice core samples which have air bubbles trapped within them. the contents of the air bubbles from ice 1000 years ago is representative of the air 1000 years ago. unless somebody has been going deep into ice shelfs and injecting ancient air bubbles with contaminated samples, it has shown to be effective. it's not a computer simulation or projection. there are preserved atmospheric samples. it's measured directly.A computer makes guesses. A COMPUTER. A man made object set to calculate parameters set by MEN. Computers can make physical observations dumbass. They only can assess data. And guess what, we have ABSOLUTELY ZERO physical data from 400,000 years ago. ABSOLUTELY NONE. You can take today's geographical and know what happen 400,000 years ago even with the most advance computer b/c it's not in the same period or time frame. It's PROJECTING, which means its not fact, it's just an educated guess. Fossils data can be altered and manipulated by nature over time. There absolutely no in way to tell HOW OLD they are. It's like those idiots that purposely but a fresh human skeleton at a dig site and these scientist said it was 1,000 years old by these computers you put your faith in.
show me an example of a fresh human skeleton that was called 1,000 years old. please, show me a link.
that's not what theory and law means. repeating it doesn't make it right. something being a theory or a law has nothing to do with it being physically observed. we can observe cells. but biology still operates under "cell theory." chemists and physicists operate under molecular theory and atomic even though we can physically observe molecules and atoms.I love you bring of the THEORY of Relativity. THese reason it's a THEORY and not scientific fact is because you cannot physically observe it. That it is not the Law of Relativity, like the Law of Thermodynamics, the Law of Gravity, etc. It's ALL THEORIES AND PROJECTIONS, NOT FACT. That is the difference between scientist today and yesterday, is the latter stated their findings as Theories. Even Darwin labeled it the Theory of Evolution. Today's scientist try to pass off theories as facts and idiots like you believe it just because it's in a textbook.
Law of Gravity still applies in physics. It was not replace by the laws of Relativity. Einstein just expounded on Newton's laws. Dude, go read a physics book. Theories are Theories because they cannot be PHYSICALLY OBSERVED. It has nothing to do with mathematics. It's everything about physically observing. AND NO IN HUMAN BEING has observed what happened 100 millions of years ago no less 400,000 years ago. That is why these PROJECTED findings will ALWAYS BE THEORIES. But by all means, but your faith in this.
and yes, newton's law of gravity has been superseded by einstein's theory of relativity. that doesn't mean that we disregard everything from newton's work. but we know newton's laws weren't precise.
again, you mistakenly believe that old data is collected by computer simulation. that is just wrong.These guys are 40-50 years removed from being taking in their pants, breast sucking, cry their heads off babies, and, with the use of COMPUTERS, they really know what happen before any recorded history. Please keep on believing this .
^ Never heard of radiometric dating? Carbon 14 dating? Pretty accurate in the grand scheme of things.
Also, both special and general relativity have been proven empirically - you might want to go back to the early 20th century and read about some dudes called Michelson, Morley, Ives, Stelwell, Maxwell and others. Gravitational redshift of light confirms the general relativity and is also used for numerous other scientific observations. There are formulas and stuff too, you know.
Edit : Beaten by spurraider21
I'm an earth system scientist and you don't have a ing clue what you are talking about, so STFU.
In fact, it's abundantly clear that few of you have bothered to actually read the evidence about a physical phenomenon that will determine the course of history. There are about 15,000 papers, so I suggest you start with an IPCC summary for policy makers, or the American Academy of Science summary.
Oh, and btw, we are currently witnessing a tipping point in the climate system. This is what it looks like: http://www.google.com.au/amp/www.the...cience-twitter
And this is happening at a time when the sun is comparatively cool, and aerosol pollution is still significantly masking the warming signal. Global civilisation is in real trouble.
Last edited by RuffnReadyOzStyle; 11-21-2016 at 04:25 PM.
even the most intelligent minds in the world would reach incorrect conclusions if they are working with misinformation and incorrect data
Well it's apparent you don't know what the original fight was about between me and this other poser. I'll give you a summary of what basically lead up to it. Poster X started mouthing off about how the popular vote was not legit and that fraud had been committed because in his eyes illegals and felons voted despite there not being any proof of that. I called him on his bs and he got emotional and started mouthing off by saying nobody has the right to criticize or disagree with Trump. I'm always going to take offense when a dumbass foreigner tells me I can't criticize the leadership of my own country.Yeah because Paris climate agreement, trades deal, NATO changes and globale USA foreign policy doesn't matter for the rest of the World
And like we have seen in 08' with the subprime crisis, an internal US economic crisis doesn't affect the rest of the world economy for years
If Quantum Physics were not valid, your cell phone would be useless.
But nice try.
My god you're stupid.
It's safe to say that Cowboys guy needs a new ST account.
Wow
It's been a while since we've seen someone destroyed so thoroughly.It's safe to say that Cowboys guy needs a new ST account.
US Republican party is literally the only conservative party in the world that denies Global Warming: https://www.theguardian.com/environm...climate-denial
I quit looking at this ignorant-assed clickbait thread, but the le says that Pop ripped into Trump. After last night's game, Pop ought to rip into himself for a while.
In the postgame, he's talking about how they didn't "respect the other team". But he's talking about the players, and not about himself for sitting two of his starters, and instead starting a not-ready-for-the-NBA rookie, and guy who has just come from Europe, and is trying to adjust to the NBA. But it's all the players' fault. I'm not sure why anyone gives a about his political advice, since he'd run a country the same way he runs a basketball team.
thats telling him
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
