Reply With Quote
I just think it's a silly squabble.
Are you two married?
Why do you ask?
I just think it's a silly squabble.
Are you two married?
Why does it matter what you think?
yes, which can be enough to have the evidence excludedYep.it's like a criminal complaining about an illegal search.
In a court of law but not in the court of public opinion.
i'm pretty sure somebody facing criminal chargers would be more concerned with the court of law
And?
Didn't you asked me what that name meant a while back and I told you it has to do with NASCAR? You must be one stupid to think I'm some random war of warcraft playing got. It also tells me you dont post in the Tech Forum, otherwise you would know I'm as much a PC gamer as you are skinny.
Master race
It doesn't, but I can't help but think the two of you are both applying for the Forum Jester position currently held by Boutons.
Nascar my asscarAnd?
Didn't you asked me what that name meant a while back and I told you it has to do with NASCAR? You must be one stupid to think I'm some random war of warcraft playing got. It also tells me you dont post in the Tech Forum, otherwise you would know I'm as much a PC gamer as you are skinny.
What am I talking about.
You were also the guy who thought I was a CIA agent or some .
Complete nutcase.
Particularly when most people don't have to concern themselves with 'public opinion' as the press does not give a about them.
This probably hurt their opinion of her the most.
https://youtu.be/TC0AKNQBV80
A bipartisan group of senators just released a statement to Trump about Russian hacking
“For years, foreign adversaries have directed cyberattacks at America’s physical, economic, and military infrastructure, while stealing our intellectual property.
Now our democratic ins utions have been targeted. Recent reports of Russian interference in our election should alarm every American,” read the statement, which was also co-signed by Senators Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) and Jack Reed (D-Rhode Island).
“Congress’s national security committees have worked diligently to address the complex challenge of cybersecurity, but recent events show that more must be done,” the statement continued.
“While protecting classified material, we have an obligation to inform the public about recent cyberattacks that have cut to the heart of our free society.
Democrats and Republicans must work together, and across the jurisdictional lines of the Congress, to examine these recent incidents thoroughly and devise comprehensive solutions to deter and defend against further cyberattacks.”
The statement comes on the heels of a bombs CIA report claiming that the agency has verifiable evidence of Russian involvement in pre-election cyberattacks.
http://usuncut.com/politics/bipartis...ssian-hacking/
Hillary wasn't ever in court to defend herself because she was never brought up on charges.
No, I never thought you were a CIA agent.What am I talking about.
You were also the guy who thought I was a CIA agent or some .
Complete nutcase.
... and even the Repugs, after 8 or more Repug witch hunt committees and many $Ms, couldn't find evidence to bring her into court.
And then their bogus Iraq hero Petraeus was vastly more guilty of violating NatSec and is still going strong (but is on probation, confined to NC)
which i guess makes that a poor comparison to bring up in the first place
Because she deleted them.
How accurate is that report, compared to the report the CIA gave president Bush before the Iraq war?
As a UK official reported, the Iraq war "intelligence" as "fixed up" to fit the policy of invading Iraq for BigOil.
We also know head visited CIA/NSA or whatever many times DEMANDING, BULLYING the data he wanted. And there was huge dissent with those agencies about the "evidence"
aluminum tubes?
curve ball?
Saddam did 9/11?
etc, etc, etc
ALL LIES from the Repug war criminals. Ms of people dead, maimed, displaced for BigOil and that Repug disaster is STILL in progress.
So you cherry pick the "evidence" for the Iraq war as true, irrefutable, but deny the evidence, no doubt to be delivered, from many agencies that Russians ed with the election?
USA's imperial predation has ED WITH dozens of countries internal affairs for decades. That's OK with you rightwingnutjobs.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 12-11-2016 at 08:43 PM.
Shazbot... You are simply making up now, like usual.
... says the totally reliable AGW denier
Fox’s Judge Jeanine has bonkers rant: If you investigate Russian 2016 hacking, you’re against America
http://www.rawstory.com/2016/12/watc...e+Raw+Story%29
War is Peace, Bad is Good, Black is White, Up is Down, Poor is Rich, continuing the fantasy world created by the 2001-2008 Repugs.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
