How do you know Obama didn't communicate a demand for it to stop? Do tell.
That doesn't tell me how you know. That simply doubles down on your earlier claim.
How do you know Obama didn't communicate a demand for it to stop? Do tell.
the FBI is compromised and Repug Comey epitomizes that FBI disaster, with his two political hit jobs on Hillary.
ODNI agrees that the hacking was done, but not with the "motive" getting Trash elected.
That's ing stupid, given that the only stuff hacked and released hurt Hillary, and it was released weekly, to keep hitting Hillary.
NOTHING was released from the Repug machines.
No, they don't. They are fully in agreement.
Again, lie all you want to yourself, just stop pissing on my shoes like I am too dumb to see your piss for what it is.
If he did, Putin treated that demand like all other communications with Obama. He ignored it. Obama was weak with Russia.
I know he tried to use it as a zinger but his comment to Romney in the 2012 debates did shed light that he didn't seem to think that Russia was our biggest geopolitical threat.
Turns out Podesta's emails leaked out because he clicked on an obvious phishing link, after one of his advisors accidentally told him that it was legitimate instead of illegitimate:
An extensive New York Times report on this summer's catastrophic email hack of the Democratic National Committee has turned up a very embarrassing detail about how the attack took place. It was reported at the time that Clinton campaign manager John Podesta fell victim to a phishing scheme — specifically a fake "account reset" appearing to be from Google — but it now seems that a typo from one of Podesta's aides may have played a crucial role in ensuring that email's success.
When the phishing email first arrived, Podesta referred it to a number of aides. An aide named Charles Delavan replied, "This is a legitimate email. John needs to change his password immediately." But according to the Times report, that email was a simple flub — at least according to the aide in question. Delavan says he knew the email was a fraud, based on similar phishing attempts that had been spotted and blocked. He had meant to write "illegitimate email," and simply mistyped. On that recommendation, the email was opened and the account was compromised, resulting in the publication of Podesta's archive. Unaffiliated trolls subsequently used information from the emails to compromise Podesta's iCloud account and remotely wipe his iPhone and iPad.
The result has to be one of the more consequential typos of the year. According to the Times, it's an error that "has plagued [Delavan] ever since."
http://www.theverge.com/2016/12/13/1...clinton-russia
Thank goodness these morons aren't running the country. No wonder they want to blame it all on Russia - the alternative is admitting that none of them know how to use a computer in 2016.
The story was never buried. The American people just didn't care. If someone other than Hilliary was running, it might have been a bigger story. However, Clinton was involved in her own pay to play scandal. The options were pretty limited this past election when it comes to electing someone with the moral high ground.
DUR, I'm duh president, and I have very big words.
"Clinton was involved in her own pay to play scandal."
why wasn't she charged? because it was all fabricated and hyped by the Repugs
Benghazi!
btw
House Benghazi committee files final report and shuts down
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/p...down/95336692/
Benghazi!
and Trash and Hillary are equally "immoral"?
You're being obtuse now.
Hilllary definitely was just as stupid about computers as Donald.
You got that one right.
Too bad for you that Trump is dumber in so many other ways. It will be fun pushing your face in the puppy quotes this guy is going to leave for the next few years.
So you don't know that Obama didn't communicate anything. I do understand.
One candidate just used social media and the Internet to meme his way into the White House.
The other candidate? Well...
Whereas President Barack Obama has long publicly cultivated his geek persona, embracing new technologies, trying new tools and generally trying to prove his tech savvy, Hillary Clinton comes across in the FBI interviews as a disengaged tech user who sees the communication tools as little more than a means to an end. She has, according to multiple aides, never even learned how to use a desktop computer. Clinton regularly pumped those around her for help with her devices—even those, as her long-time aide Philippe Reines joked to the FBI, whose job had "zero percent" of their responsibilities focused on IT. Reines, whose name is redacted in the FBI files but whose iden y is easily discernible, "likened it to your parents asking for technical help with their phone or computer."
http://www.politico.com/magazine/sto...ent-fbi-214307
Exactly. Like in "Jaws" that one part:::"You say 'barracuda,' everyone says 'Huh?' 'What?'"
"You saw 'shark' and we have a panic on the 4th of July."
---
Same thing with this:::"You say 'Wiki Leaks' everybody is saying 'huh?' 'what?'"
You say::::"Huma sits on Hillary's face every nite." And you have 30 million guys and one old in AZ., beatin' their meat."
Russians are also messing around in Germany and France politics, and apparently were involved in the Brexit election.
Y'alls adorable St Ronnie the Diseased ed up Central America, and it's still ed up, spilling political refugees over USA's border.
And Nixon/Kissenger overthrew Allende in 1973.
And Eisenhauer/CIA overthrew Iran's democratically elected Mossadegh in 1953
I think the left ran out of Preparation H shortly after early November.Lots of butt hurt in here today
We don't know.
I just had a random though (pun intended.)
What if Russia hacked for their own protection? Here we have the left, demonizing Russia. Wouldn't we do the same to them if one of their parties demonized us during an election? Wouldn't we want to know what the internal, possible president, is saying?
Maybe they found things out they didn't like, so they did seek to destroy her presidency. Wouldn't that be of her own making?
Suck talk the left has had about Crimea, Ukraine, Syria, etc. has been very harsh against them.
Can anyone blame them if this is why?
Here's a random thought. What if it wasn't even Russia who did the hacking. What if it was Israel's Unit 8200 who hacked it and made it look like Russia. Netanyahu could still be pissed Obama ed with their elections and still isn't happy about the Iranian deal. They've got more to gain with a Trump presidency than Russia.
I'm sure you're glad Trump one, since you get to do the puppy thing. Lucky you.
What if it was Wild Cobra who hacked it?
Seems that's something he and Donald agree on.
So why is the intelligence community (supposedly) leaking info to the media but refusing to brief congress on what they actually know?
Any guesses?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
