Reply With Quote
but i'm not so sure you'd like definition 3
Definitely an issue in politics. This is a pretty good list of the fake news stuff.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/defin...rm=fake%20news
but i'm not so sure you'd like definition 3
I got no problem with fake news. More often then not it helps.
Dems started it. Instead of us taking up the good fight and looking like fools with our in our hand we read their book then went to work sharpening the process. Now? We're good at it. Damn good.
Guess who's REALLY PISSED OFF, right? or left? about at attempt to stop FAKE NEWS?
Conservatives Are Outraged Over Facebook’s Plan To Use Fact Checkers To Weed Out Fake News
A Republican Party and a conservative moment that has moved from facts to beliefs are outraged that Facebook would use a coalition of fact checkers in their effort to weed out fake news.
The Daily Caller was not pleased that Snopes is one of the fact checkers that Facebook has turned to,
Breitbart claimed that the fact checkers are partisans, “Facebook has announced it will introduce warning labels on stories they deem to be “fake news,” with the help of partisan “fact checking” organisations such as Snopes and PolitiFact.”
The headline on the top of The Drudge Report, “FAKEBOOK TO LABEL ‘NEWS'”
The reason why conservative media is so outraged is that they have been conditioned to distrust anything that doesn’t come from their own movement. Fox News built a cable news empire by selling their viewers the belief that Fox News is the only network that tells the truth.
conservatives brought this on themselves. Their complaints over what they believed to be biased from Facebook’s Newsfeed editors led to the dismissal of the editors, which allowed obviously fake news websites to game Facebook and launch viral stories full of false content.Conservative skepticism is understandable, but allegations of partisan bias are not.
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/12/...iticus+USA+%29
You bubbas, rednecks, kickers, Fox watchers, Breitbar devourers, Duck Dynasty beards shouldn't worry.
If FB stops your bull , you have plenty of other places to spew your lies, slander, hate.
We'll see how long they stay that course when there is no $ coming back for it.Guess who's REALLY PISSED OFF, right? or left? about at attempt to stop FAKE NEWS?
Conservatives Are Outraged Over Facebook’s Plan To Use Fact Checkers To Weed Out Fake News
A Republican Party and a conservative moment that has moved from facts to beliefs are outraged that Facebook would use a coalition of fact checkers in their effort to weed out fake news.
The Daily Caller was not pleased that Snopes is one of the fact checkers that Facebook has turned to,
Breitbart claimed that the fact checkers are partisans, “Facebook has announced it will introduce warning labels on stories they deem to be “fake news,” with the help of partisan “fact checking” organisations such as Snopes and PolitiFact.”
The headline on the top of The Drudge Report, “FAKEBOOK TO LABEL ‘NEWS'”
The reason why conservative media is so outraged is that they have been conditioned to distrust anything that doesn’t come from their own movement. Fox News built a cable news empire by selling their viewers the belief that Fox News is the only network that tells the truth.
conservatives brought this on themselves. Their complaints over what they believed to be biased from Facebook’s Newsfeed editors led to the dismissal of the editors, which allowed obviously fake news websites to game Facebook and launch viral stories full of false content.Conservative skepticism is understandable, but allegations of partisan bias are not.
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/12/...iticus+USA+%29
You bubbas, rednecks, kickers, Fox watchers, Breitbar devourers, Duck Dynasty beards shouldn't worry.
If FB stops your bull , you have plenty of other places to spew your lies, slander, hate.
LOL thinking this will affect them economically.
That's what I'm sayin'...there is no $ in doing what they claim they will do. It's all goodwill. That's for . I'll give it 6 months, tops.
Nobody did the fake news better than Norm McDonald.
Alex Jones Threatens To Sue Facebook Over New Initiative To Fight Fake News, Which He Claims Is A CIA Plot
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/12...rica+-+Blog%29
MediaMatters = fake news.
It's a way for them to silence anything that goes against the msm narrative, just denounce it as fake and have snopes rubber stamp it. Then the msm regains their monopoly on information. Leftists and right wingers alike will flag content they don't like, but only breitbart and drudge will be censored
CNN is 100% fake news, tbh. Dating all the way back to and before Bush 1
Seems appropriate...
True. I got no problem with the Conservative Fake News. And the liberal meltdown fake news is quite comical. Just as long as people can tell the difference.
Sue Ansbach Salvesen
"Do you also blame the Clinton team for promoting Trump over the other 16 clowns? This can be easily found if you bother to read wikileaks. Clinton wanted Trump to be on MSM news outlets. She thought he would be the easiest of the clowns to beat. Boy, were she and her cronies ever wrong."
Food for thought.
What the happened to this place? Nobody here anymore. Did somebody die? Did somebody lose money? Did somebody get her broad ass handed to her by The Trumpster?
Oh, The Trumpster. He's in Florida tonite.
The funeral to Socialistic dreams.
That link doesn't debunk anything. If you watched that footage and didn't think those fellows were putting on a show then you're a sucker. How about that actress they hired spouting atrocities like leaving babies on the floor to die? Guess what - it worked; Americans were outraged and the precedent for war was set.
Helmet for a chemical attack, let that sink in.
George Soros is funding it. Will not be unbiased fact checking.Guess who's REALLY PISSED OFF, right? or left? about at attempt to stop FAKE NEWS?
Conservatives Are Outraged Over Facebook’s Plan To Use Fact Checkers To Weed Out Fake News
A Republican Party and a conservative moment that has moved from facts to beliefs are outraged that Facebook would use a coalition of fact checkers in their effort to weed out fake news.
The Daily Caller was not pleased that Snopes is one of the fact checkers that Facebook has turned to,
Breitbart claimed that the fact checkers are partisans, “Facebook has announced it will introduce warning labels on stories they deem to be “fake news,” with the help of partisan “fact checking” organisations such as Snopes and PolitiFact.”
The headline on the top of The Drudge Report, “FAKEBOOK TO LABEL ‘NEWS'”
The reason why conservative media is so outraged is that they have been conditioned to distrust anything that doesn’t come from their own movement. Fox News built a cable news empire by selling their viewers the belief that Fox News is the only network that tells the truth.
conservatives brought this on themselves. Their complaints over what they believed to be biased from Facebook’s Newsfeed editors led to the dismissal of the editors, which allowed obviously fake news websites to game Facebook and launch viral stories full of false content.Conservative skepticism is understandable, but allegations of partisan bias are not.
http://www.politicususa.com/2016/12/...iticus+USA+%29
You bubbas, rednecks, kickers, Fox watchers, Breitbar devourers, Duck Dynasty beards shouldn't worry.
If FB stops your bull , you have plenty of other places to spew your lies, slander, hate.
http://www.poynter.org/about-the-int...cking-network/
what exactly are you claiming is fake about that broadcast? are they not in saudi arabia? are they using a green screen? what exactly is the allegation?
i have no problem with "fake news' if its satirical or parody. i also recognize that legitimate reporters and journalists can come to factually incorrect conclusions, and as long as they issue a retraction and acknowledge the error, it's fine.
but when "news" is blatantly false and pushed around as true, i dont see the benefit of that. all you do is misinform people who use that to make a decision... and i'd argue that an uninformed decision is not a legitimate decision to begin with
Kock Bros, Mercers, Coors, DeVos, etc fund 100s of orgs, illegal super PACs, illegal 501 orgs, including ALEC, but you have no problem with VRWC funding?
Only Soros, the nemesis the VWRC had dictated you rightwingnutjobs to hate, could possible be subverting the truth, right?
^ Bou s, defending foreign interference in our political process. ^
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
