Klay's not a better offensive player. Case and thread closed.
Is this thread going to track every box score like the Curry thread?![]()
Klay's not a better offensive player. Case and thread closed.
Probably. Because some people love being insecure.
klay thompson is nothing more then a overglorified red
And Klaynus isn't Usain Bolt but that didn't stop you from making that dumbass comparison, tbh.
thats makes no sense. thats like saying the spurs wouldnt trade parker for cp3 because they need interior defense
So you agree the Kerr/Jordan analogy was pretty ing stupid.
It was an extreme example to hammer a point home into the thick skulls of some of the posters here. I was trying to get that nail through the thick skulls and into the small brains of the people that think Klay it a better offensive player based on shooting.
So then Kawhi is a better offensive player than Curry.
lmao djohn2008 owned this thread
Spurs fans are so insecure about the Dubs and Kobe
Stupid question. Curry's a much more versatile offensive player than Thompson. Curry's not just a shooter. He can dribble the ball at a high level, penetrate, dish, he's a more complete versatile offensive player. He just also happens to be a great shooter on top of that.
But is he more versatile than Kawhi? Would he still be in the league if he couldn't hit the 3? Happens to be? That's his calling card. He's a 3pt shooter.![]()
He's still much more versatile than Klay. I haven't watched Curry play much this season. Last season he was better clearly better than Kawhi, not sure about this season though. Kawhi has upped his game and from the looks of it, Curry has gone down a bit with Durant there. I will have to watch some of his games to answer that, but unfortunately i hate watching the Warriors play. I don't like that style of ball, so maybe if I can force myself to watch some of their games, I'll answer that question later.
Good, because the question isn't whether Curry is better than Klay on offense. It's whether Klay is better than Kawhi on offense. If assisted baskets don't count, and 3pt shooting is graded on a curve, then you'd have to consider Steph a shooter first and a scorer second. He's noted for shooting, as we all know.
UPDATE
Kawhi (40 games): 25.1 PPG on 49/41/91 shooting
Klaynus (42 games): 21.1 PPG on 47/39/84 shooting
but klaynus scored 60 that one time
![]()
btw, gaymond green's incapability to defend quality scoring centers is pretty obvious.
DeRozan better than Lebron and Kawhi... based on your reasoning
3rd option vs 1st option
The Westbrook principle
Career averages![]()
Klay also stat pads against garbage team while Kawhi has set career highs against Dominos/Le .![]()
Got sonned by Biyombo.![]()
He's a first option on an elite team, Klay isn't. He averages more points and has better percentages across the board. That's my reasoning.
WTF is your reasoning for Klaynus not only being better but in your words 'much better', moron?
What about djohn2oo8, tbh?
Answer the questions.
Is DeRozan better than Steph or Durant? Is Isaiah Thomas better than James Harden, Lebron, Steph and Kawhi? His PPG "right now" would suggest so.
So state your case, why is KL a better scorer "right now" than Klay Thompson?
Do you not know how to read got? I stated my case. State yours.
As for the rest of your post, I'll just copy my other post since you're basically spewing the same nonsense in both threads:
LeBron coasts at this point in his career, you've said that yourself. He has a scoring le under his belt. Steph and KD have recent scoring les as well. The most Klaynus has ever averaged is 22.1 PPG. If I ignore your stupid attempt at a deflection, it's because it's stupid not because you have me cornered, dumb .
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)