People are consistently calling you out for your lack of comprehension.
Who the is everyone? No one has even replied to it.
Imaginary people now? Delusional .![]()
People are consistently calling you out for your lack of comprehension.
I constantly destroy posters. Try again.![]()
Who says that? Imaginary people?
He would be awesome on the Bucks. They need shooting and a PG who can play off ball to allow Giannis to do his thing.
Spurs are in a tough spot. Hope they find to make it work.
That's your forte, got.![]()
That doesn't make any sense.
You're one that talks to imaginary people, got. It's your forte.![]()
That really doesn't make any sense.
That's cause you're a dumbass.![]()
not sure I understand dabom pay Patty in the off season stance tbh...
you pay Patty and you put yourself in a worst spot than with Parker![]()
I love Patty but he is heading towards 30s, his defense is based on his energy to be a pest, this is what he does, energy defense that will fade away with more minutes and age... For this kind of price you want him to be a starter but then again Patty is not a playmaker tbh at all. Kawhi is already main piece on scoring and defense, what's the plan here ? transform him also in a PG ala Lebron? Play Kyle ing Anderson as PG?
... at this point better calling Utah to get Boris back
It's too bad Murray wasn't drafted a year earlier. With some seasoning, he could have been in the mix for minutes in the Anderson/Simmons/Butler spot last year and might have made Manu expendable this year. In the very least the Spurs would have a better idea of what to do with Patty this summer had they had more time to see Murray. My official stance is to go for a big-fish guard first and then build the best roster you can after that. It's possible for Patty to be part of one or both of those paths, but keeping 3/4 or the current guard rotation is risky unless there's some major internal improvement for a young guard.
But obviously, the Spurs aren't likely to trade Parker, so the answer of "Yes, pay Patty and trade Tony" is sort of dishonest. The likely question is whether to commit $40 Million to Parker, Patty and Green or let Patty walk.
Excellent Aussie article about Patty's value in free agency: https://pickandroll.com.au/aussies-n...portsman-2017/
if parker makes $15 million next year, how much does patty?
patty's advanced metrics beats tony's virtually across the board:
patty also has a better: PER, TS%, OWS, DWS, WS, WS/48, OBPM, DBPM, BPM, VORP.
the spurs offensive rating & defensive rating are both better with patty on the court instead of parker.
nice find.
Good read. Cheers.
Let him walk. He doesn't deserve big money. He shoots and that's it. He does nothing else well. Not worth big money.
People have been overrating Patty for years on here. He's always been an undersized SG. I remember when he was taking more shots than Kawhi and no one else seem outraged by it the way I was. He's always been streaky at best and an inefficient chucker at worst. People might not remember but Patty was a big reason we lost to the clips a couple of seasons ago. He was getting destroyed by Austin scrub Rivers and allowed the clips to get back in it iirc. Dabom is my dude but I don't agree with him on Mills. Paying Mills big money would be a huge mistake.
I think if Mills resigns, it is going to be a home-town discount a la Green who really wanted to stay as a Spur..But I wouldn't be mad at Patty if he pursues the money elsewhere; this is his one and last opportunity at getting big pay check whereas Danny could probably still get another +10 millions contract in 2018.
One ing game isn't a series dude. Get it together. Dude shot 70% TS that whole series. We can re-watch all the games if you want.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)