Reply With Quote
Support what? That there was hacking?
That Russia is an enemy?
That people who merely disagree with anonymous government sources are giving "aid and comfort" to US enemies?
Go for it.
Trash's toady Assange could just say who gave him the cracked info. If not Pootin, then who?
Support what? That there was hacking?
That Russia is an enemy?
That people who merely disagree with anonymous government sources are giving "aid and comfort" to US enemies?
Go for it.
Even Nixon -- feeling sure Kennedy screwed him in 1960 -- cared too much for his country to challenge the result.
You may not be a partisan, but your criticism is focused mainly on one party. Pattern of posting trumps self-avowals.
"How significantly did RU rely on Facebooks algos in its propaganda campaign?"
Clapper keeps calling the sources and methods here as "very fragile."
I don't disagree that my criticisms are focused mainly on one party, disagree with the second part. If I have a pattern of posting trumps self-avowals that should be easy to show. I'll wait for you to provide.
Bump
Has any US intelligence agency actually had access to the DNC server to do their own forensics analysis or has the DNC denied them access like they denied the FBI? Why is the DNC denying access to any US intelligence agency?
Is the entire US intelligence agency conclusion based off the DNC hired CrowdStrike analysis?
trumps as a verb, not as possessive noun
Lol ok understood now
That super sophisticated state-sponsored phishing hack tho. Pedesta's password was 'password'.
rightwingnutjob cretin SUCKERED again
Politifact found that there was “no material evidence” to confirm the claim, noting that Google “doesn’t even allow Gmail users to make their password ‘password’”:
None of the emails published on WikiLeaks show Podesta’s email password. And of the cyber analysts examining the phishing emails used to infiltrate Podesta’s and others’ accounts, none have made similar claims.http://mediamatters.org/research/201...+-+Research%29
[...]
There is no material evidence to back up this claim. Google doesn’t even allow Gmail users to make their password "password."
We know from the stolen Podesta emails published on WikiLeaks that he used a Windows 8 login that had the password "p@ssw0rd." But that’s not for his email account.
Who cares what his password was. All that matters was the content of the emails was not falsified, which it wasn't. It's entertaining watching you dodge this point every chance you get.
rightwingnutjob cretin SUCKERED again
Politifact found that there was “no material evidence” to confirm the claim, noting that Google “doesn’t even allow Gmail users to make their password ‘password’”:
None of the emails published on WikiLeaks show Podesta’s email password. And of the cyber analysts examining the phishing emails used to infiltrate Podesta’s and others’ accounts, none have made similar claims.http://mediamatters.org/research/201...+-+Research%29
[...]
There is no material evidence to back up this claim. Google doesn’t even allow Gmail users to make their password "password."
We know from the stolen Podesta emails published on WikiLeaks that he used a Windows 8 login that had the password "p@ssw0rd." But that’s not for his email account.
rightwingnutjob cretin SUCKERED again
Politifact found that there was “no material evidence” to confirm the claim, noting that Google “doesn’t even allow Gmail users to make their password ‘password’”:
None of the emails published on WikiLeaks show Podesta’s email password. And of the cyber analysts examining the phishing emails used to infiltrate Podesta’s and others’ accounts, none have made similar claims.http://mediamatters.org/research/201...+-+Research%29
[...]
There is no material evidence to back up this claim. Google doesn’t even allow Gmail users to make their password "password."
We know from the stolen Podesta emails published on WikiLeaks that he used a Windows 8 login that had the password "p@ssw0rd." But that’s not for his email account.
True, but one of his passwords on his personal computer was p@ssword.
What gets lost in all this Russian hysteria is how stupid and negligent the DNC was in all of this.
It doesn't get lost, it just flat out doesn't get reported in 90% of the Western Media.
so it does get reported. so much for a media blackout.
Here's how y'alls cuddly, adorable Vlad runs his dystopia
Russia Requires Apple and Google to Remove LinkedIn From Local App Stores
The demand by Russian authorities to remove LinkedIn in Apple and Google app stores comes weeks after a court blocked the professional networking service for flouting
local laws that require internet firms to store data on Russian citizens within the nation’s borders.
The action is the equivalent of a nation banning “Catcher in The Rye” and then forcing booksellers to remove the le from their shelves. It puts Apple and Google in a difficult position.
The companies are strong proponents of open internet policies and free speech but are now being asked to be agents for governments that censor its citizens.
http://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/06/te...in-russia.html
even HuffPo occasionally throws cold water on the hypothesis that Russian troll farms hijacked the election:
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry...b00d7e4c1a9a34
I don't say Pootin's troll farms hijacked the election.
who can say Pootin's troll farms had no effect in the Presidential election that is often won by razor thin margin, 80K votes in 130M votes cast?
Pootin/Assange had a greater effect, dribbling out Pootin-stolen Dem emails weekly to distract from Hillary's campaign.
And Comey, with an AST from Nunes, had the greatest effect with his two trashings of Hillary, esp the one 10 days before the election.
( how can Repugs be down on Comey when he elected Trash? )
Russian trolls pushed the Jade Helm bull to inflame TX secessionists and even TX govt "monitored" Jade Helm in case Obama was going to invade/occupy TX.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
