Reply With Quote
Nah. Contraction is the answer. Move the Grizz and drop the 6ers and the Nets. Move their best players to the bottom tier teams in the East.
Bend over, I'll in' show you who's gonna drive you home tonight.
Nah. Contraction is the answer. Move the Grizz and drop the 6ers and the Nets. Move their best players to the bottom tier teams in the East.
Not Milwaukee? Then, the T-Wolves and Bucks could have a real interstate rivalry.
Good defensehalf time score 27-21
god, what a joke.
This may be a bit off topic, but let's say if Indiana somehow acquired Jimmy Butler and Giannis the Greek freak without losing Paul George, how much of a threat would they be to the Cavs?
Thats so ing uncool its unbelievable.
Clippers in Finals
Bend over, I'll in' show you something unbelievable.
When Dunleavy is bought out I can see him go to Memphis, TBH.
pizzagate reference.... wtf?
One of the dumbest threads I've ever seen. The Grizzlies have always been in the West, dating back to their time in Vancouver (which obviously was before LeBron entered the league). But yeah, it's a vast conspiracy to help LeBron.
Who in the East would you even swap Memphis out for? They're not moving the Bulls back to the West (too much history in the East at this point). I guess the West could trade the Grizzlies for the Bucks, but then all you LeBron haters would whine that they were swapping out the biggest future threat to LeBron's dominance in the East for an aging and declining treadmill team.
LeBron has inspired more deranged conspiracy theories than any other pro athlete I can think of. It's hilarious seeing grown men foam at the mouth like this over a basketball player
That's true. I recently read that the league office was slipping +/- $5MM under the table to the Cavs to subsidize Korver's contract.One of the dumbest threads I've ever seen. The Grizzlies have always been in the West, dating back to their time in Vancouver (which obviously was before LeBron entered the league). But yeah, it's a vast conspiracy to help LeBron.
Who in the East would you even swap Memphis out for? They're not moving the Bulls back to the West (too much history in the East at this point). I guess the West could trade the Grizzlies for the Bucks, but then all you LeBron haters would whine that they were swapping out the biggest future threat to LeBron's dominance in the East for an aging and declining treadmill team.
LeBron has inspired more deranged conspiracy theories than any other pro athlete I can think of. It's hilarious seeing grown men foam at the mouth like this over a basketball player
Actually I did read somewhere a couple of months ago that in conjunction with the adoption of the new CBA, the league would expand (not contract) by 2 teams in the near future. I surmised that they would both be located in the west - including an expansion team for Seattle. I cannot cite a source, and I read it only once. Who knows? But that is not my trolling or sarcasm.
Last edited by sasaint; 01-08-2017 at 06:50 PM.
ON separate note: think moving the Wolves East makes sense ..Rejiggering conferences might have be visited again if the Seattle gets a team back..
Wouldn't work with travel, but would be great if the league kept the schedule at 82 games but had 3 against each opponent except for one division (which you would play only 2 against). Would create the most balance and guarantee about three home dates every two years with the league's big stars. Would also allow for the most balanced strength-of-schedule and a true 1-16 seeding system.
Being in NYC, it's hard to get excited for most of the teams coming to town so can't imagine what it's like having only one team. Out East, Cleveland will sell tickets and Toronto should, but other than that it's pretty slim pickings (I do want to see Milwaukee and Philly for obvious reasons). Maybe it's just me being selfish and wanting more trips from Western Conference teams.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
