Reply With Quote
you're dense. John Podesta's emails were illegally obtained by Russian hackers. Hacking is illegal.
This has all to do with the fact that Hillary used a private server for government business for which she was being investigated by the FBI.
Right, none related to the FBI investigation which means the FBI information was gained legally. Everything else was just released and shaped public opinion, caused Donna Brazile to resign and whatever shakeup that happened in HRC's camp. There have been no legal actions related to that, afaik, so I don't really get why the two separate issues are being conjoined in these discussions.
you're dense. John Podesta's emails were illegally obtained by Russian hackers. Hacking is illegal.
This has all to do with the fact that Hillary used a private server for government business for which she was being investigated by the FBI.
But the FBI doesn't care about John Podesta's emails. Comey isn't involved in that from perspective of HRC's investigation.
It has all to do with it, so why do you keep bringing it up? In a response to both Assange's actions and Comey's actions, you asked "Were the emails obtained illegally?". Since you're so sloppy, one could simply address that from either batch of emails, HRC's or Podesta's. You could even use Weiner's.
Clean it up, try to make sense and these types of tangents will be less frequent.
i think the FBI has since (independent to the clinton email server issue) invesetigated alleged russian hacking. they were part of the joint statement along with the CIA
But Comey isn't being crucified over that, so we both know that's not the issue being discussed by Boutons and addressed by TSA, after which Th'Pusher sloppily interjects an ambiguous question.
One of the guests on Gutfield's show this morning said for America to give Trump a chance: "I know he looks like a lookout for a massage parlor in Staten Island, but, give him a chance."
If you wouldn't have jumped to conclusions about the question I asked of TSA this tagent wouldn't have occurred tbh.
we weren't given enough data about the source
Assange, I don't know. Assange clearly leaked week by week to sucker the press into his leaks, putting Hillary in a negative light. Assange is not non-partisan and is a Russian tool.
Comey, trashing Hillary twice, said they looked at Hillary's stuff months ago, so ask him where he got it.
Ha so true. Thats what really happened. Obama was embarrassed his cheerleading for the last few weeks of the election was basically ignored so now he is just saving face. Sad
I asked you to clarify when I said "by whom?" when you said "were the emails obtained illegally?" to which you answered with a question. Like I said, clean up your slobbering, sloppy posting.
Tell Th'Sloppy that.
Trump Calls On Congress to Investigate NBC for Reporting Russian Attack
Of all issues implicated by Russian spy measures, Trump's top priority for intel committees is a congressional investigation into NBC.
Although it is true that Donald Trump is not a child or student even though he acts like one, he does display every sign of every career criminal law enforcement officials have to witness regularly. On Friday he exhibited why he does not belong anywhere near the halls of power, and not just because he is an incompetent know-nothing, but because he is a deceitful piece of work that can never be trusted.
“I am asking the chairs of the House and Senate committees to investigate top secret intelligence shared with NBC prior to me seeing it. Who gave them this report and why? Politics!”
After just being officially “briefed” (he already knew) that a hostile foreign power committed “an act of war” against America on Trump’s behalf, instead of calling the chairs of the House and Senate committees (which ones?) to investigate the attack on America,
he wants to pursue members of the press.
that story from NBC News actually quoted an “unnamed intelligence official” confirming the Russians were rejoicing post-election.
And, it was a detail first reported by The Washington Post, not NBC News.
The “unnamed” intelligence official also described the findings of a multi-agency report that laid out the case that the Russians stole, then released, a mountain of emails for the purpose of helping Trump by damaging the Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton. It is worth reiterating that none of the “released” intelligence reports was revelatory after being in the news for months. One thing is certain;
Donald J. Trump certainly knew the dirty details of the story because the Russians admitted being in contact with the Trump campaign during and after the election.
At HuffPo they wondered why the Trump singled out NBC News when WaPo originally released the story. The answer is simple; Trump acolytes watch NBC News far more than they read the Washington Post.
No American should be surprised that a corrupt human being like Trump would go full-on criminal and attempt to distract the nation from the real and present danger of an attack on America, or lie to substantiate his assertions;
it is what criminals do.
Hrafnkell Haraldsson reported yesterday that
Rachel Maddow was stunned at Trump lying about a report that was publicly available.
Ms. Maddow remarked on Trump’s blatant lies and said,
“I have to say I don’t get weirded out by a lot of stuff in the news but this puts a shiver down my spine.”
http://www.politicususa.com/2017/01/...iticus+USA+%29
Y'alls boy Trash is one scary, ignorant, sick mother er
Trash protecting his main voter and enabler Pootin.
Last edited by boutons_deux; 01-08-2017 at 11:14 PM.
though he did out crap the crappers.
ha, ha.
Yes. Me sarcastically asking if John Podesta's emails were stored illegally should have been a red flag to you indicating that you hadn't accurately comprehend what you were responding to. Don't blame me for you inability to pick up on obvious sarcasm.
I never conflated the two. I asked why Hillary was being investigated and if Podesta's emails were doctored.
https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton
FBI releases part of Clinton emails. Haven't read this myself but from what I gather these are way more damning than anything Wikileaks released.
FBI tried to rig the election by waiting to release these until after elections.
thank goodness Assage saved us
Assange didn't release any of these. You have no idea what you're talking about
goddam, you're stupid
FBI found nothing earlier last year and found nothing on Huma/Wiener's machines, so no indictment, in which case FBI protocol dictates silence, which Repg tool Comey violated twice.
saved? Now you got Trash. saved?
goddam, you're stupid
FBI found SAP classification level emails on a private server. Explain how that is nothing.goddam, you're stupid
FBI found nothing earlier last year and found nothing on Huma/Wiener's machines, so no indictment, in which case FBI protocol dictates silence, which Repg tool Comey violated twice.
saved? Now you got Trash. saved?
goddam, you're stupid
explain why Comey didn't indict.
DOJ indicts, not Comey.
Now explain how SAP level on a private server is nothing.
U missed the point.
assage released not same emails but equally damning. Had assage not released anything FBI would be releasing this under a Hillary presidency. Assage saved us
Really? Equally damning?
Having classified emails going through a private server imo is far worse than anything from the wikileaks. Where was the smoking gun in the assange leaks? Spirit cooking? The leaks were more damning of the DNC in general, not clinton herself. Hence wasserman Schultz stepping down, donna brazile getting canned
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
