Why I think Climate Change Denial is little more than pseudoscience. - Part 1

[spurraider21]

debate settled. climate change is a hoax meant to undermine religion and god

[boutons_deux]

The 15 Most Ridiculous Things That Media Figures Said About Environmental Issues In 2016

1. Rush Limbaugh And Matt Drudge Peddled A Reckless Conspiracy Theory Downplaying The Threat From Hurricane Matthew.

2.Fox News Blamed The Flint Water Crisis On Climate Change Policies, "PC Stuff,” And Even Flint Residents Themselves.

3. CNN’s Alisyn Camerota Claimed Trump EPA Nominee Scott Pruitt “Hasn’t Denied Global Warming.”

4. MSNBC's Mike Barnicle: ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson "Is A Huge Green Guy.”

5. Disregarding Everything Trump Has Said And Done On The Subject, MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough Claimed “I Just Know” Trump Believes In Climate Science.

6. Trump Adviser Stephen Moore: Being Against Fracking “Is Like Being Against A Cure For Cancer.”

7. Stephen Moore: “We Have The Cleanest Coal In The World.”

8. Breitbart’s James Delingpole: Climate Change Is “The Greatest-Ever Conspiracy Against The Taxpayer.”

9. Fox Report On Law Gas Prices: “Put The Tesla In The Garage And Break Out The Hummer.”

10. Wall Street Journal’s Mary Kissel Instructed Viewers To “Trust” A Climate Science-Denying Fossil Fuel Front Group.

11. Fox Host Clayton Morris: Rubio's Climate Science Denial At Presidential Debate Was An "Articulate Moment.”

12. Fox Hosts Mocked Leonardo DiCaprio's Oscar Speech On Climate Change: "Focus On Something Else Other Than The Weather.”

13. Fox’s Meghan McCain: "The Liberal Hysteria Over Climate Change Was So Overblown That Now People Have A Hard Time Even Believing It.”

14. Fox’s Steve Doocy: Obama’s Monument Designation Was Done To “Appease Environmental Terrorists.”

15. Fox Hosts Flipped Out About Portland Public Schools Decision To Stop Teaching Climate Denial To Children.

http://mediamatters.org/print/742876

[boutons_deux]

...

[Wild Cobra]

I'll bet the most ridiculous things the left pundits say top those by a large margin.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

From Spurs Talk?

Science?

This group of racial and political pundits?

Are you joking?

Yeah because month long explosions in the upper atmosphere, giant tube casings from before miniaturization to present 'new tech,' assuming solar irradiation of seawater shared the same feedback dynamics as GHG, having no concept of energy storage capacities, using solubility charts to model the ocean, and thinking that the ocean currents would 'hide' warming from centuries ago all the while rejecting peer review and accepting denial blogs both categorically is how real science is done.

they readjusted the soot forcing were shown it and you still repeated the same regurgitated lines.

Having you talk about the science is funny as so in that sense it is a joke.

[boutons_deux]

I'll bet the most ridiculous things the left pundits say top those by a large margin.

you're bet is based on what? just your imagination or actual quotes from left pundits?

[boutons_deux]

New from Kockistan

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources deletes accurate climate science from agency webpage

The site went from explaining man-made climate change to falsely claiming that the science on climate change is unsettled.

https://thinkprogress.org/wisconsin-...540#.jv3ykax3q

[Wild Cobra]

you're bet is based on what? just your imagination or actual quotes from left pundits?

LOL...

When someone says "I'll bet," doesn't that indicate opinion?

[Wild Cobra]

New from Kockistan

Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources deletes accurate climate science from agency webpage

The site went from explaining man-made climate change to falsely claiming that the science on climate change is unsettled.

https://thinkprogress.org/wisconsin-...540#.jv3ykax3q

Sounds reasonable to me.

Maybe other states will follow their lead!

[boutons_deux]

LOL...

When someone says "I'll bet," doesn't that indicate opinion?

... and your opinions are hilariously uninformed.

[boutons_deux]

The last time the Earth was this warm was 125,000 years ago

http://www.usatoday.com/story/weathe...cord/96713338/

No worries, mate, Repugs will fix AGW by severely defunding NOAA and NASA, and harassing, firing all the climatologists, while permitting royalty-free resource extraction in national parks, wetlands, and killing wind and solar. See, all will be OK.

[Wild Cobra]

Another idiotic post by Shazbot:

The last time the Earth was this warm was 125,000 years ago

http://www.usatoday.com/story/weathe...cord/96713338/

No worries, mate, Repugs will fix AGW by severely defunding NOAA and NASA, and harassing, firing all the climatologists, while permitting royalty-free resource extraction in national parks, wetlands, and killing wind and solar. See, all will be OK.

The republicans know AGW is real. They also know the science does not say it will be catastrophic.

[boutons_deux]

They also know the science does not say it will be catastrophic.

What real scientists say accelerating, non-stop AGW will NOT be catastrophic?

The consensus of BigCarbon Repug s ranges widely from "hoax" to maybe but science isn't settled, all total bull .

[Wild Cobra]

What real scientists say accelerating, non-stop AGW will NOT be catastrophic?

The consensus of BigCarbon Repug s ranges widely from "hoax" to maybe but science isn't settled, all total bull .

No, but they aren't saying it will be catastrophic either.

You need to start reading the papers, and stop[ reading what the pundits say.

[spurraider21]

No, but they aren't saying it will be catastrophic either.

You need to start reading the papers, and stop[ reading what the pundits say.

define catastrophic, in terms of climate change. scientists dont call it catastrophic because catastrophic isn't a scientific term

[Thread]

This is like the Russian hacking...all total bull . Just another revenue stream for gov't.

The mother ers.

[spurraider21]

This is like the Russian hacking...all total bull . Just another revenue stream for gov't.

The mother ers.

"I don't like it, therefore it's bull ."

[Wild Cobra]

define catastrophic, in terms of climate change. scientists dont call it catastrophic because catastrophic isn't a scientific term

By George, I think you got it!

It is not being called catastrophic except by the pundits!

But you miss the fact that scientists can use regular words, and do.

[Thread]

"I don't like it, therefore it's bull ."

No. It's bull PERIOD

[spurraider21]

No. It's bull PERIOD

... you're a child who's been told santa claus isn't real.

[spurraider21]

By George, I think you got it!

It is not being called catastrophic except by the pundits!

But you miss the fact that scientists can use regular words, and do.

ok, lets not use the word catastrophics. what are the projected ramifications if we continue the trend we're on?

[Wild Cobra]

ok, lets not use the word catastrophics. what are the projected ramifications if we continue the trend we're on?

Well...

Siberia and northern Canada will become tolerable, and fantastic farm land for a growing world population.

More precipitation due to a warmer oceans means faster glacier builds and faster flows, meaning more fresh water.

More CO2 means faster plant growth, and better crop yields.

Since the daytime highs have not been globally breaking records, a warmer night means less hardship on people in the winter.

Should I continue?

[spurraider21]

Well...

Siberia and northern Canada will become tolerable, and fantastic farm land for a growing world population.

More precipitation due to a warmer oceans means faster glacier builds and faster flows, meaning more fresh water.

More CO2 means faster plant growth, and better crop yields.

Since the daytime highs have not been globally breaking records, a warmer night means less hardship on people in the winter.

Should I continue?

Wow so all the effects are positive? This is great news tbh

[Thread]

... you're a child who's been told santa claus isn't real.

What's that got to do with the price of eggs?

[boutons_deux]

Well...

Siberia and northern Canada will become tolerable, and fantastic farm land for a growing world population.

More precipitation due to a warmer oceans means faster glacier builds and faster flows, meaning more fresh water.

More CO2 means faster plant growth, and better crop yields.

Since the daytime highs have not been globally breaking records, a warmer night means less hardship on people in the winter.

Should I continue?

how about Miami, Galveston, New Orleans, New York, etc, etc, and 100Ms of people, if not Bs, displaced by ocean rises?

btw, by the way, severe drought, as NAFTA did, is driving Your Favorite People from south of the border, north to USA. yep, drought refugees right here in USA.