Reply With Quote
No Thread. That's a red herring.
Nor the word [scandal]. Hussein Obama demands Ferguson PD to not release that video of the Gentle Giant committing strong arm robbery minutes before he's killed by Ferguson PD. Yeah, that SOB didn't want the American people to see that video. When FPD refused and released it Hussein had no case and he knew it. What'd he do? Brazened it out and egged those Fergusonites on to burn and loot their city. That, Pusher is scandal.
No Thread. That's a red herring.
No, here's a red herring:::Hussein Obama adopts Trayvon Martin while he's tagged & slabbed.
No Thread. That's a lie. For an old man, you're pretty ing ignorant.
Hussein is a race baiter, Pusher. He'd been waiting his entire life to get even with whitey.
So you're saying you agree with me?
That's what we call an opinion. An opinion with which I happen to disagree.
For 's sake, are you stupid? It would only have been a lie if Zeke Miller was intentionally reporting false information. He explained that he didn't see the bust as it had been obstructed. That's not intentionally reporting false information, therefore it wasn't a lie.
you actually need further explanation.
Nope, lie.
Fake news.
Don't have to listen anymore.
Lalalalalalalalala Hail our Dear Leader
Instead of trying to be the first to break another story making Trump look bad he should have confirmed the missing bust before tweeting it was missing. These idiots are playing right in to Trump's hand with the "fake news" narrative and the more they report things before confirming the more they'll be ignored and dismissed even if what they are reporting is true.For 's sake, are you stupid? It would only have been a lie if Zeke Miller was intentionally reporting false information. He explained that he didn't see the bust as it had been obstructed. That's not intentionally reporting false information, therefore it wasn't a lie.
I called it sloppy reporting in my initial response. That doesn't make it a lie, which is what I took issue with.
I wasn't disagreeing with your initial response just expanding on it. To me it's more than just sloppy reporting as his intentions were clear, make Trump look bad.
It's not just "sloppy reporting." It's biased reporters who are so desperate to bash Trump that they'll fabricate reasons to do so. Doesn't matter if it's the MLK bust, the White House webpages that were supposedly "deleted" (in reality, moved to an archive, as is standard practice when a new president enters office), or the myriad other fake-ass stories they've pushed over the last year and a half. At some point, it stops being "sloppy" and starts being a smear campaign.
As always during a Republican presidency, journalists' basic responsibilities come second to bashing the president and his administration.
I also called it "likely presumptive" in my initial response.
It's a tried and true en lement for conservatives toabout the liberal media. That the current POTUS may be the biggest pussy to ever hold the office only exacerbates the plight.
current liberals are by far bigger pussies and are the ones doing the
So, do you think that if someone stood in front of the bust and obstructed it during Obama's terms, this journalist would be running out to report it?For 's sake, are you stupid? It would only have been a lie if Zeke Miller was intentionally reporting false information. He explained that he didn't see the bust as it had been obstructed. That's not intentionally reporting false information, therefore it wasn't a lie.
What is the chance of someone obstructing this bust in Trump's 2 days of presidency but no one obstructing this bust in 8 years of Obama's presidency?
That would have been on Fox News for a week and you know it.
I'm not denying the reporter was looking to break a salacious story, but I think that's more a product of the media's need for clicks to survive than an inherent bias against Trump administration.
If it were just the media's need for clicks to survive then he would have reported under Obama's presidency too. I wonder if 2 days into a Hillary administration, this reporter would be breaking this news - I don't think so.
And if a someone mistakenly reported that Obama had removed the bust it would have been an issue. I can see the headlines now, "Obama removes bust of MLK; having bust of Malcolm X commissioned."
You do realize the reporter corrected himself immediately after determining the bust had not been removed, right?
Had it been the Hillary administration that Times reporter would have sent an email first to Hillary's team asking if it was okay and if any changes would need to be made.
It's a ing lie you moron.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
