This is regulating
the system wasn't rigged, Hillary ran a dumb social justice campaign, and believed she had some kind of magical firewall and just ignored key states.
I agree Hillary is also corrupt but not buying into the California shtick bs when it comes to the popular vote. If you take Texas away Hillary has even a bigger margin of victory when it comes to the popular vote. I use Texas in this example because it's the republican version of California and is the second biggest state in the US. So let's see what the math shows after you take away Texas and the total comes down to Clinton getting 61,977,247 and Trump getting 58,298,570 which is a difference of 3,678,677. Even better lets take away both California and Texas' votes. I have even done the math for this and if you take away both Texas and California's votes Hillary still edges out Trump by over 232,396 votes. Here is the total amount of votes both candidates receive after taking both states away which is Clinton 54,614,757 and Trump 54,382,361 Bottom line no way you spin it the majority of the country is opposed to Trump.
If Spurs wins ship pop would visit WH and see trump...that'd be hilarious
You know, I get it. The dude can be a . He says what's on his mind, because he just doesn't give a f*ck. He also likes to put the media in their place. Strangely enough, this is why some people like him.
Am I talking about Trump or Pop?
It's no surprise considering their leader, Trump, is extremely thin skinned as well: whining about everything including SNL, celebrity comments, and Hamilton. Those aren't even news organizations. It's one thing to respond to presumed news bias, it's another thing to whine about how satire shows and celebrities are treating you unfairly. Imagine if Obama had twitter tirades against the SNL parodies about him about how it's "sad" and "unfair" that they are falsely portraying him. The entire alt right would be laughing their asses off.
Wait your argument is that Hillary only won the popular vote because more people came out to vote for Hillary? Trump won the electoral college and the EC is currently how the US picks the president so there's no disputing that. But you can't just say Hillary's popular vote win isn't legitimate because you want to arbitrarily exclude a state in the union. If you say that, I can say, if you exclude Texas, Hillary's popular win margin would have been astronomical!
Doesn't fit their caveman tractor riding logic
Don't kid yourself, Obama was as thin-skinned as it got. He spent his administration taking passive-aggressive jabs at Republicans as often as possible.
He literally set up a website for people to report any criticism that anyone made of him
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs...=.5ed771d83159
His administration ordered Democratic strategists not to appear on FOX News because they were mean to Obama.
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/nov.../na-obama-fox8
Governors and senators who have personally dealt with him describe him as thin-skinned and overly sensitive to criticism.
http://humanevents.com/2012/01/30/ba...ned-president/
I've always had to laugh at liberals who complain that Trump is "thin-skinned." Not only is it ironic coming from the party of political correctness, you're complaining about qualities that the guy you just elected twice had in spades.
Doris Burke quit her NBA gig because she could not handle Pop belittling her any more. Right or wrong she wanted OUT.
Be careful with that last word you used Clipper Nation. You might want to edit given today's sensitivity.
Dude none of your points is equivalent to what Trump did. Responding to news organizations and statements from other politicians is fair game. I even put that in my post so I don't know what the misunderstanding is.
1. Website reporting criticism. Literally from the article you posted: "Mostly, that means fact checking statements from the likes of GOP presidential contenders Mitt Romney and Rick Perry and conservative commentator Glenn Beck and offering evidence to the contrary."
2. Telling strategists not to appear on fox news. Thinks conservative news organization is unfair so they shouldn't try to argue with them on TV. Fox news is a news organization I just said responding to perceived news bias is okay. News organizations need to be held to a higher standard and I didn't criticize Trump for his countless tirades against the news so I don't know where this came from.
3. Republicans criticizing Obama for being thin-skinned. Dude this is mostly Republican politicians trying to portray Obama in a bad light in private conversations. Has Obama ever launched public tirades against specific senators and politicians? Even if he did, other politicians are fair game.
Trump personally feeling the need to publicly put down SNL, celebrities, and people who aren't involved at all in politics because they somehow wronged him is a whole other level. Until you can provide proof of Obama doing that, I'll stop discussing this with you.
1. When Trump uses the Internet to respond to attacks on him, he's "thin-skinned." When Obama does it, it's "fact-checking." Funny how that works.
2. When Trump yanks a dishonest rag's press credentials, he's a "fascist" who doesn't respect a free press. When Obama bullies his entire party into freezing out a dissenting news outlet, it's okay because "FOX is unfair." How convenient.
3. When Democrats call Trump "thin-skinned," they're spot-on. When Republicans who have actually spoken with Obama face-to-face call him "thin-skinned," they're just trying to make him look bad. Interesting.
You might as well just be honest and admit that the (D) next to Obama's name and the (R) next to Trump's is all that matters to you. You don't give a rat's ass about the president's personality, only their party affiliation.
California is the larges state in terms of population, I don't get you're point. It's not like their vote in the election doesn't matter. It's sort of like a Cav's fan saying that "We would've won by 38 had Kawhi not played and dropped 41,"
It's just not a valid argument. Trump lost the popular vote by almost 3,000,000 and has a 40% approval rating entering office. He isn't likely going to change very many minds when he takes health care to more than 18,000,000 people.
It was a no brainer who to choose between the two of them.Haha, he has his flaws, trust me Hillary is no saint either.
One's qualified to be president and the other had a rich dad and spent most of his adult life losing money or using shady business practices to make money.
trump hosts a reality TV show and says our president is a muslim born in africa
response: vote for trump for president
pop speaks out against trump
response: POP SHOULD STFU![]()
Trump is stealing my schtick
Obama was passive aggressive
No reasonable person hoping to be taken seriously would equate Trump and his Administration's public/online temper tantrums to Obama'spassive aggressive jabs
.
You can find examples of jabs at the opposition from every President in this country's history.
You'll be hard pressed to find any other President sending out early morning communications complaining about how he's portrayed on a comedy sketch show.
...and no Democratic strategist ever appeared on Fox News again...His administration ordered Democratic strategists not to appear on FOX News because they were mean to Obama.
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/nov.../na-obama-fox8
Governors and senators who have personally dealt with him describe him as thin-skinned and overly sensitive to criticism.
http://humanevents.com/2012/01/30/ba...ned-president/Human Events: Powerful Conservative Voices
Jan Brewer
Eric Cantor
Pat Roberts
Bobby Jindal
"Governors and Senators say..."
I've always had to laugh at liberals who complain that Trump is "thin-skinned." Not only is it ironic coming from the party of political correctness, you're complaining about qualities that the guy you just elected twice had in spades.at your pathetic equivalency. You and Kellyanne would make a good pair.
But Pop disrespected the office of the president!
![]()
ROFL Conservatives in the South go waving the rebel flag all the time, acting like the North didn't cuck them into submission.
That's real rich coming from Pop when he treats the media like s**t and the media ain't doing anything but lavishing praise on him (unlike Trump).
Pop is one of those elite liberals who don't understand that half of America (and much more than half of Spurs fans - considering what state Spurs is from) don't care about sexism, racism, and whatever ism these people are protesting. They just want a job to put food on the table and pay the mortgage without being called racists and bigots for not agreeing with the liberal bs.
Speak for yourself. Reading you over the past week has demonstrated that you are about as bright as big, old black dildo.
You should at no point think you are qualified to speak for half of America. You struggle to speak an original thought as it is. It is a chorus of conservative talking points you clearly did not come up with yourself.
They were selling your .
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)