Reply With Quote
While I agree that the left is collapsing, any article that starts with "we turn (once again) to Marx's profound understanding of the state and capitalism" probably isn't worth reading.
The source of the angry angst rippling through the Democratic Party’s progressive camp is not President Trump–it’s the complete collapse of the Left globally. To understand this collapse, we turn (once again) to Marx’s profound understanding of the state and capitalism.
We turn not to the cultural Marxism that is passingly familiar to Americans, but to Marx’s core economic analysis, which as Sartre noted, is only taught to discredit it.
Cultural Marxism draws as much from Engels as Marx. In today’s use, cultural Marxism describes the overt erosion of traditional values–the family, community, religious faith, property rights and limited central government–in favor of rootless Cosmopolitanism and an expansive, all-powerful central state that replaces community, faith and property rights with statist control mechanisms that enforce dependence on the state and a mindset that the individual is guilty of anti-state thinking until proven innocent by the state’s own rules.
Marx’s critique of capitalism is economic: capital and labor are in eternal conflict. In Marx’s analysis, capital has the upper hand until the internal contradictions of capitalism consume capital’s control from the inside.
Capital not only dominates labor, it also dominates the state. Thus the state-cartel version of capitalism that is dominant globally is not a coincidence or an outlier–it is the the only possible outcome of a system in which capital is the dominant force.
To counter this dominance of capital, social democratic political movements arose to wrest some measure of control out of the hands of capital in favor of labor. Social democratic movements were greatly aided by the near-collapse of the first version of cartel-capitalism in The Great Depression, when writing down the bad debt would have brought down the entire banking system and crippled capitalism’s core function of growing capital via expansion of debt.
The decimated owners of capital realized that they faced a bleak choice: either resist and be toppled by anarchism or Communism, or cede some of their wealth and power to the social democratic parties in exchange for social, political and economic stability.
Broadly speaking, the Left favored labor (whose rights were protected by the state) and the Right favored capital (also protected by the state).
But over the past 25 years of globalized neoliberalism, social democratic movements have abandoned labor to embrace the self-serving wealth and power offered by capital. The essence of globalization is: labor is commoditized as mobile capital is free to roam the globe for the lowest cost labor. In contrast, labor is far less mobile, and unable to shift as fluidly and frictionlessly as capital to exploit scarcities and opportunities.
Neoliberalism–the opening of markets and borders–enables capital to effortlessly crush labor. The social democrats, in embracing open borders, have ins utionalized an open immigration that shreds the scarcity value of domestic labor in favor of lower cost immigrant labor that serves capital’s desire for lower costs.
Globalization and neoliberal financial / immigration policies signify the collapse of the Left and the victory of capital. Now capital completely dominates the state and its cronyist structures–political parties, lobbying, campaign contributions, charitable foundations operating as pay-for-play cash vacuums, and all the other features of cartel-state capitalism.
To mask the collapse of the Left’s economic defense of labor, the Left’s apologists and PR machine have subs uted social justice movements for economic opportunities to acquire economic security and capital. This has succeeded brilliantly, as tens of millions of self-described “progressives” completely bought the left’s Great Con that “social justice” campaigns on behalf of marginalized social groups were the defining feature of Progressive Social Democratic movements.
This diversionary sleight-of-hand embrace of economically neutered “social justice” campaigns masked the fact that social democratic parties everywhere have thrown labor into the churning propellers of globalization, open immigration and neoliberal financial policies–all of which benefit mobile capital, which has engorged itself on the abandonment of labor by the Left.
Meanwhile, the fat-cats of the Left have engorged themselves on capital’s largesse in exchange for their treachery. Bill and Hillary Clinton’s $200 million in “earnings” come to mind, as do countless other examples of personal aggrandizement by self-proclaimed “defenders” of labor.
Please examine this chart, which depicts labor’s share of GDP (economic output), and tell me the Left hasn’t abandoned labor in favor of personal wealth and power.
The Left is not just in disarray–it is in complete collapse because the working class has awakened to the Left’s betrayal and abandonment of the working class in favor of building personal wealth and power. Anyone who denies this is still in the fatal grip of the Left’s Great Con.
http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2017/...-the-left.html
While I agree that the left is collapsing, any article that starts with "we turn (once again) to Marx's profound understanding of the state and capitalism" probably isn't worth reading.
There's always going to be a "Left" and a "Right." Each will go up and down in popularity until the sun explodes.
It can be condensed into Capital is mobile and labor isn't.
Globalism s the average worker in developed nations.
lol even a short article is tldr these days...millennials are ed
Not remotely the point of the article
I think it can be said that labor is no longer a priority for the Left. Where the writer loses me is his hyperbole over their motivations and the insinuation that a commitment to social causes is some big distraction.
But, yes, the Left has seemed to transform from a populist labor movement to a progressive social movement with a global economic philosophy that, at times, stems from the desire for global social progress.
Last edited by Spurminator; 01-26-2017 at 05:23 PM.
It's not "too long, didn't read." It's "too Communist, didn't read."
The author seems to think the left's collapsing because it's not socialist enough. In reality, it's collapsing because it's already way too radical.
What's communist about it?
The whole article is written from a pro-Marxist and anti-capitalist perspective.
Only matters who have power. Left had one, at least in US, failed, hope never comeback.
Okay. So what are your views the mobility of capital vs the mobility of labor?
You really don't read the you post, do you?
"this headline is something I agee with, the rest of it is TLDR"
Explain what's communist about the article. You're the self proclaimed economist/insurance salesman on the board.You really don't read the you post, do you?
"this headline is something I agee with, the rest of it is TLDR"
Also what are your views on the mobility of capital vs the mobility of labor?
Last edited by SnakeBoy; 01-26-2017 at 06:10 PM.
It's Marxist, not communist.
Same difference. People who have nothing and want to share it.
No, not the same difference. One can be an anarcho-Marxist and not a commie.
I disagree with both, for the record, btw
The article isn't about marxism or communism. I bolded the point of the article for 's sake.
Congrat's to CC and Spurminator on their reading comprehension
It's incredibly Marxist. The idea that traditional leftist/progressive movements fail because they don't address underlying class antagonism -- which is the whole point of the article -- has been repeated by Marxists for over a 100 years.
The article isn't about marxism
3rd ing sentenceWe turn not to the cultural Marxism that is passingly familiar to Americans, but to Marx’s core economic analysis, which as Sartre noted, is only taught to discredit it.
An article that turns to "Marx's core economic analysis" isn't about Marxism?
Marxist, tbh.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
