Reply With Quote
How ridiculous to insinuate an indirect Trump connection to a market result in a thread about an indirect Trump connection to a market result.
I called it the night of the election. I have made a tidy profit from all the stupidity.
How ridiculous to insinuate an indirect Trump connection to a market result in a thread about an indirect Trump connection to a market result.
That was not my interpretation. You said that there were worldwide protests and then spoke for what said worldwide protesters say and what they should feel. It is what it is.
Nice strawman though.
And you said it meant "entire world". Now it doesn't. Make up your mind. Either way, stop polluting threads with your bickering.
Well record highs are usually considered high.
Pretty much all analysts believe more growth is ahead for 2017. I haven't seen any legit arguments for recession worries in the near term. Corrections are expected in any bull market and would be buying opportunities. Mixed predictions for 2018...we are overdue for a recession.
So has the stupidity ended?
Stocks are scary when people who know nothing about them look at it only to see some red text and dipping graphs.
my bickering. You had no posts here until I posted. You got a hard on for me apparently.
Not until mid year at least. You just need to know when to get on and off the ride.
Let it go.
Well...
There have been record highs that have gone much much higher. It just depend on the time frame you look at.
So you know when to get on and off?
When you have made a lot.
There is a lot to lose.
I know a good day trader, and so far it's been great.
Well as I said corrections are expected in any bull market. Should go higher but nobody is a psychic.
Trumps plan for regulatory reform should help growth. Trumps cut taxes and spend plan should help growth...for awhile at least.
Not into that type of gambling.
And possible trade difficulties down the line as well.
Trump is responsible for stocks when you know nothing about them look at it only to see some green text and rising graphs.
Think about why I bumped this thread as opposed to starting a new one. Deep thoughts.
I'd like to but you follow me around from thread to thread. I tell you I am not interested but you are persistent.
"Deep thoughts"
ing -.6% in a day, +30pt swing near the end of the trading day and you want to pull out the shallow politics card. What, are we patting Trump on the back for a fluffed up market surge too?
You'll probably be talking politics again when that Yellen wants to kick up the interest rates for s and giggles. Never touch a Bloomberg terminal.
Most of what I've read has the market generally encouraged by the idea of improving our trade deals. It's a tricky one though, Trump could do well or make a royal mess.
Too deep for you apparently but I will help."Deep thoughts"
ing -.6% in a day, +30pt swing near the end of the trading day and you want to pull out the shallow politics card. What, are we patting Trump on the back for a fluffed up market surge too?
You'll probably be talking politics again when that Yellen wants to kick up the interest rates for s and giggles. Never touch a Bloomberg terminal.
It was a similar jump when the OP was made but because we have 10 fingers the arbitrary end point was significant and attributed to Trump. That was the point, dim.
Nice strawman flail though.
Uh... Do you know what thread you're in?What, are we patting Trump on the back for a fluffed up market surge too?
Well it's a bad point your trying to make.
Such in depth analysis.
Conservative hypocrisy is entertaining at least.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
