Reply With Quote
She was the source of the fake report fuzzyfakenews.
She was the source of the fake report fuzzyfakenews.
Given that you would stroke your conservative ilk if they were arguing that the sky was not blue on a clear day, this hurts. Really.
you've proven time and time again you have no impulse control and do in fact read and respond to what you claim to ignore.
There is no evidence of that. The AP story clearly indicates that they are two separate reports. Maybe if you wish hard enough it will become true.
At least this time there is no direct evidence that she is not the anonymous source like your stupidity claiming she was an AP reporter.
LOL strawman building. Back your up fuzzyfakenews.
Bull . You read all my posts. You don't have the self-control to stop yourself from clicking "View Post." This is just the schtick you're falling back on after being proven wrong and not wanting to admit it.
I already quoted the portion of the article stating that the Mexican report was a different report and the AP source was someone with access to the official transcript.
What strawman am I building?
This should be entertaining if you answer honestly which I doubt you will.
Estevez fake news was picked up by the AP and fuzzyfakenews dutifully reported it while ignoring Mexico's clear assertion that Estevez lied.
Fuzzyfakenews
You claim that yet the AP clearly statesEstevez fake news was picked up by the AP and fuzzyfakenews dutifully reported it while ignoring Mexico's clear assertion that Estevez lied.
Fuzzyfakenews
They clearly recognize her similar report as separate. That is not how they 'dutifully report' another's scoop, dim.A person with access to the official transcript of the phone call provided only that portion of the conversation to The Associated Press. The person gave it on condition of anonymity because the administration did not make the details of the call public.
The Mexican website Aristegui Noticias on Tuesday published a similar account of the phone call, based on the reporting of journalist Dolia Estevez. The report described Trump as humiliating Pena Nieto in a confrontational conversation.
One shread of proof that she is the AP's anonymous source cause right now you ahve nothing. You can post as many emojis and ad hominems as you like but that is all you ahve.
If AP had a transcript they would print it. They don't and can't.
Give up fuzzyfakenews.
At least you have moved on from claiming that the Mexican reporter was the source. Now the AP is lying.:LOL Little Kunt just can't admit he was wrong and got his ass called out.
If AP had a transcript they would print it. They don't and can't.
Give up fuzzyfakenews.
I do like how you started with the echo chamber's response, tried to shoehorn the response into the new information the AP provided, and then finally resorting to just making up when it was clear that the shoehorning was full of .
I also note you dropped the strawman horse .
The AP is reporting that there is a transcript. Deal with it.
More Fake News
Keep digging fuzzyfakenews.At least you have moved on from claiming that the Mexican reporter was the source. Now the AP is lying.
I do like how you started with the echo chamber's response, tried to shoehorn the response into the new information the AP provided, and then finally resorting to just making up when it was clear that the shoehorning was full of .
The AP is reporting that there is a transcript. Deal with it.
The AP doesn't claim to have a transcript of the conversation.
Who said they did? They have a source with the transcript. I quoted the salient portion of their article.
Try and keep up.
Give up fuzzyfakenews!!!! The United States and Mexico have both stated officially and repeatedly, that it didn't happen.
You breathlessly reported fake news and got your silly ass called for it.
Move on.
The WH has stated officially he did not say that? Link please.
Give up fuzzyfakenews!!!! The United States and Mexico have both stated officially and repeatedly, that it didn't happen.
You breathlessly reported fake news and got your silly ass called for it.
Move on.
The AP is reporting it. The Mexicans have not addressed the AP report. They addressed their own journalist's report.
Deal with it.
lol Fuzzy
Lol fuzzyfakenews stubbornly and predictably refusing to admit he was forwarding fake news. You just look stupid now.
Wishcasting indeed.
The AP is reporting it and has not retracted. It is what it is. Could be that the AP is being lied to. It is also possible the government is lying.Lol fuzzyfakenews stubbornly and predictably refusing to admit he was forwarding fake news. You just look stupid now.
Wishcasting indeed.
You apparently do not know what wishcasting is.
Not your finest hour, Fuzzy
if the reports have the same conclusion, would it really matter if they've addressed the two separate reports?
They don't have the same conclusion. The Mexicans repudiated the tone that the Mexican reporter claimed the conversation had. The AP claims ot hae a source with a transcript.
At this point it boils down to who you want to believe. There is no definitive proof one way or the other.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
