Reply With Quote
Clearly Kellyanne was trying to pull a fast one and dupe all of America. Thank God we have the left to do fact checking and clean up. How many years in prison should she get OP?
Yeah looks like her weekly makeovers include botox injections and the whole premium package.
I guess its kinda gross she wears those clothes that expose her mummified rotting parts. Not a fan of that stuff
Clearly Kellyanne was trying to pull a fast one and dupe all of America. Thank God we have the left to do fact checking and clean up. How many years in prison should she get OP?
Of course not. But, you ain't female. We age different. We age better. Women aren't blessed that way.
But, right now, this minute she owns it. And she knows it. That's rare when a human can find themselves exactly where they want to be in a given sequence of time. I don't grudge her that like I didn't grudge that Josh Ernest fellow, Barry's press briefer. I hated his content, but, he had the position there and he was in awe of it and blessed to have achieved it. I find that absolutely beautiful.
ADDENDUM:::And is she in over her head? Yes. You can see it as she makes her fight. She's fast, too fast, but, she holds the line that she's marked. It's a tenuous hold and her adversaries know it there on CNN/MSNBC. So, they come hard at her, trying to get her to break, to take a fit. But, she'll go out there when all the others refuse. And she doesn't just frequent the soft seats at FOX and the others. I hate those interviews. I feel sick to my stomach as the soft balls are tossed in. But, when does CNN/MSNBC it's her stretching herself, making the good fight, so that when someday as she readies to go on into the dust that is always end, she'll enter her house justified.
Thank god we have Conservatives to clear things up with the real alternative facts
I mean, you guys know it's okay to say, "I'm glad Trump is the President and I don't regret my vote, but Kellyanne Conway is kind of full of ," right?
Like, it's okay. You won't lose points.
We have alternative facts coming from both sides. The swamp is all inclusive.
We have Kellyanne Conway coining the term "alternative facts"
If she was trying to create a false narrative, she sucks at it. You have to go on multiple interviews and say the same lie, e.g. Susan Rice with the "offensive YouTube video caused Benghazi" nonsense.
Just like Trump sucks at creating false narratives saying he really won the popular vote or having er announce he had the most attended inauguration ever, but he still does it. And then the right cheerleads and wants to pretend like this is all normal. It's not. Trump doesn't care if the he says is a straight lie and easily debunked, just like he didn't when he was on his birther crap or claiming Ted Cruz's dad was behind killing Kennedy. But hey, he is angry and it's emotionally satisfying for Republican voters.
Wow, I just heard Frederick Douglas was a victim in the bowling Green massacre.
I'd probably agree with you about those two things, but this was about the Bowling Green massacre.
To me, it just seems like she f'ed up her talking points.
It's pretty consistent for those talking points to be ed on purpose.
It's a ridiculous term we can agree on that.
This is the guy who said over and over that Hillary was the founder of ISIS.
Trump krew: 2+2=5
Media: uh we checked and 2+2=4
Tk: no no it's our alternative facts. Again, 2+2=5.
Media: wut? Please explain.
Tk: FAKE NEWS! You're out to get us!
She probably just learned the talking point and ed it up.
Passing the ban was just to appease their base. They dont actually have a reason for doing it.
Exactly.
Information is sometimes not welcome. I want her to be dropped into the Trump campaign from like God, pure and driven like snow. Instead extraneous information is now in my gourd that she'd been with many campaigns.
That's life though.
This administration is not en led to the benefit of the doubt
What's kinda amazing to me is that some people think these people are credible in the slightest.
I did understand people rolling eyes when Shillary would go and say "I always been against the TPP". She was never credible.
That's why I don't get some people defending this stuff, or agent Orange "best inauguration ever", etc. I mean, I get it from the rah-rah standpoint, but you're not really buying any of it, right?
you don't understand the right's governing philosophy
1) piss off liberals
2) cut taxes for the wealthy
so yes, they're "buying" it
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
