Reply With Quote
Speaking from experience?Russians make good wives, tbh.
I imagine they're good s given that they are flexible due to their extensive and long years practicing ballet.
Russians make good wives, tbh.
Speaking from experience?Russians make good wives, tbh.
I imagine they're good s given that they are flexible due to their extensive and long years practicing ballet.
Nah, not personally. I'm not married quite yet, but I have a southern bell cooking my breakfast who I'll probably tie up sometime this or next year.Speaking from experience?
I imagine they're good s given that they are flexible due to their extensive and long years practicing ballet.
I was with a Russian girl for about 3 years. Pretty amazing girl, very humble and family oriented - her sisters were the same. They're sexually liberal, but socially conservative from my experience.
99% of this russia "news" are leaks with no named sources. Yet cnn is reporting it all as facts
s have basically become The Daily Star or the Inquirer
Why do you keep watching this crap then?99% of this russia "news" are leaks with no named sources. Yet cnn is reporting it all as facts
s have basically become The Daily Star or the Inquirer
What do you read?
Lol
AP has been protecting sources for over a century so that people could talk about what goes on without fear of reprisal for being a whistleblower.
Now that it is being used against Trump it's a problem?
Hater's way has Nixon finish his term.
A US presidential candidate conspiring with the Russians is bigger than a US presidential candidate spying on his political rivals.
Lol Caring what Dan Rather says. Conspiracy News Network.
Speaking of Watergate, who cares that the information was illegally obtained, why aren't we just worried about the CONTENT of what was taken/recorded?
Most experts that saw the call transcripts concluded that there was nothing complicit or incriminating with the conversations with the russians.
There wasnt even a good reason to fire Flynn. No evidence whatsoever.
Otherwise if someone here has any evidence to the contrary please post it here.
Because the content has nothing special or unlawful
We have no idea what the content is. You cannot make such a claim.
Flynn lied about his discussing sanctions with the Russian ambassador. That is cause for dismissal.
Oh yes I can. Innocent until proven guilty. Thats the motto of Lady Liberty.
You actually cannot make a claim that they did anything grievous
And many lied and kept their jobs. Obama and Clapper for example about the secret spying of american citizens
"The FBI in late December reviewed intercepts of communications between the Russian ambassador to the United States and retired Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn — national security adviser to then-President-elect Trump — but has not found any evidence of wrongdoing or illicit ties to the Russian government, U.S. officials said"
http://thehill.com/policy/national-s...s-with-russian
Presumption of innocence in a criminal trial is different than saying with certainty what was or was not said in the phone conversation. You are playing defense counselor as opposed to neutral arbiter.
I never made that claim. I am saying that there needs to be a thorough nonpartisan investigation.
Take it up with Trump. He fired him.
"The FBI in late December reviewed intercepts of communications between the Russian ambassador to the United States and retired Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn — national security adviser to then-President-elect Trump — but has not found any evidence of wrongdoing or illicit ties to the Russian government, U.S. officials said"
http://thehill.com/policy/national-s...s-with-russian
I'm not reading your posts, TSA, because without scripts allowed the "view post" button doesn't work.
Either try a different account or have fun yelling into the void.
Not much difference than elitist celebrities trying to influence an election by coercing a society of sycophants that hate the "rich".
Your loss. Continue on looking foolish claiming they don't know the content of what was discussed even though the FBI already investigated
Neil Cavuto of Old Fox News scalping and skull- ing New Fox News and giving them some advice on how to handle being the definitive media joke. #truf
So anonymous "U.S. officials" who leak to exonerate your guy are all the proof you need. Good to know for future reference.
Should these leakers be sought out and prosecuted? These leaks could amount to obstruction of justice if there's an ongoing investigation.
New Fox News is just getting their s kicked in and their followers know what Fox News viewers felt by being ridiculed for following such a faux media outlet trying to push a 1-dimensional agenda. #RoleReversal #TrumpPOTUSnotClinton
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions