Page 11 of 53 FirstFirst ... 78910111213141521 ... LastLast
Results 251 to 275 of 1325
  1. #251
    Pronouns: Your/Dad TheGreatYacht's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Post Count
    36,459
    Simmons and Mills will be tough to replace, that's for sure

  2. #252
    Hope springs eternal. SAGirl's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    27,774
    As much as some of us wish they would, the Spurs will not make any deals before the deadline. They have two types of players: 1) players who are untouchable for a variety of reasons, and 2) players who are on such cheap contracts that they wouldn't net anybody in exchange who would move the needle this season.
    That's exactly the situation, plus I will add the guys in small contracts are producing very well for their contracts. If you send them out unlikely you get even their equivalents just on chemistry, and understanding and oF Pops system. That still doesn't stop the idle chatter...

  3. #253
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Post Count
    2,007
    Pop has not played Bertans as a wing the entire season. He has his rookies to train for upcoming seasons and team building. It's just how it is. You promote 3 rooms in spots (Forbes unknown if he's even a rotation quality player and send out guys that are producing right now at very cheap prices anyways) your trade makes the team worse tbh.
    This doesn't make Forbes a rotation player.

    And the 3 you want to hang onto aren't really producing like you want to think. All 3 are replaceable. Thompson has shown more than KA and Simmons.

    I know you want to hold on to KA but he isn't something that is make our break for us.

  4. #254
    Veteran sasaint's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    14,298
    Chinook, I tried to get your attention for this question. I haven't seen you involved in any extensive dialog, so I'll try again. Hope you can shed some light... Thanks.

    Chinook, what are Manu's on-ball and off-ball 3-point percentages? I thought he was consciously making a transition to a spot-up 3-point shooter and he was doing so with success. I really thought he was becoming a Steve Kerr or Robert Horry for this team, and I was excited to see it. He still has games where he tries to be the young Manu, which really irritates me, but I guess your point is well taken: since the Spurs do not have a strong, reliable penetrator on the roster, they have to do it by committee. I sure wish Manu would just channel some Kerr/Horry and refrain from his "playmaking" efforts, but I am surprised that you indicated that he was not as effective shooting the 3 off the ball.

  5. #255
    Veteran sasaint's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    14,298
    That's exactly the situation, plus I will add the guys in small contracts are producing very well for their contracts. If you send them out unlikely you get even their equivalents just on chemistry, and understanding and oF Pops system. That still doesn't stop the idle chatter...
    Yep, despite the fact that some of our "bargain" players do not produce like we would hope or like, they are still pretty productive and very inexpensive. Your points about chemistry and understanding the system are well taken, too. If the Spurs make any deals before the deadline, my wife will have to call EMS.

  6. #256
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Post Count
    2,007
    .

  7. #257
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    Chinook, I tried to get your attention for this question. I haven't seen you involved in any extensive dialog, so I'll try again. Hope you can shed some light... Thanks.
    I don't think this is a useful distinction. First, because on-ball and off-ball isn't really something that gets parsed out statistically. You can have assisted versus unassisted, but that isn't the same thing. Beyond that, you don't really get a percentage for assisted attempts, since by definition, every assisted attempt is a conversion.

    I would assume, like everyone not named Jimmer Fredette, that Manu shoots better "off the ball" than he shoots "on it". But the second reason why he's not a useful distinction is that not all off-ball threes are created equal. Bowen's three came off the ball, and so do Korver's. But Bruce was much less dynamic, since he only shot from certain spots and wasn't really a guy who affected a defense with his movement around the perimeter. I don't think there's an easy way to get stats on this either, but I don't think Manu is very dynamic off the ball. I have watched some highlights recently and do see him scoring on some shallow cuts and screens, so he's not completely stationary. But he's not really putting pressure on the D with his shots or attempts.

    If Manu is being aggressive with his shot, those will come up "on the ball". But for the most part, his threes are reactive. They come off someone doubling another player or overhelping. In that regard, what separates him from Tony, Pau or LMA is simply increased opportunities and willingness to shoot. On a given play, his role is not to force rotations by cutting across the formation while someone else does something. His role is usually to be that someone doing something.

    I don't want him to be another Kerr or Horry. Those guys are from a different era. Their performances aren't nearly dynamic enough to work today. They'd have to play in a different way -- at least Kerr would. The game is just different. Manu as an off-ball player can't sit back and do that, because Bertans could come in and do it sooooo much better.

  8. #258
    Veteran sasaint's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    14,298
    I don't think this is a useful distinction. First, because on-ball and off-ball isn't really something that gets parsed out statistically. You can have assisted versus unassisted, but that isn't the same thing. Beyond that, you don't really get a percentage for assisted attempts, since by definition, every assisted attempt is a conversion.

    I would assume, like everyone not named Jimmer Fredette, that Manu shoots better "off the ball" than he shoots "on it". But the second reason why he's not a useful distinction is that not all off-ball threes are created equal. Bowen's three came off the ball, and so do Korver's. But Bruce was much less dynamic, since he only shot from certain spots and wasn't really a guy who affected a defense with his movement around the perimeter. I don't think there's an easy way to get stats on this either, but I don't think Manu is very dynamic off the ball. I have watched some highlights recently and do see him scoring on some shallow cuts and screens, so he's not completely stationary. But he's not really putting pressure on the D with his shots or attempts.

    If Manu is being aggressive with his shot, those will come up "on the ball". But for the most part, his threes are reactive. They come off someone doubling another player or overhelping. In that regard, what separates him from Tony, Pau or LMA is simply increased opportunities and willingness to shoot. On a given play, his role is not to force rotations by cutting across the formation while someone else does something. His role is usually to be that someone doing something.

    I don't want him to be another Kerr or Horry. Those guys are from a different era. Their performances aren't nearly dynamic enough to work today. They'd have to play in a different way -- at least Kerr would. The game is just different. Manu as an off-ball player can't sit back and do that, because Bertans could come in and do it sooooo much better.
    Thanks, Chinook, for replying. Personally, I would rather Manu spot-up than drive most of the time - actually all the time except those rare throw back games which, unfortunately, nobody can predict.

  9. #259
    Veteran cd021's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Post Count
    9,873
    Simmons and Mills will be tough to replace, that's for sure
    Mills leaving means that there is about 22mpg that need to be filled at PG, as Parker's continued to age and decline, he's taken on an increasingly bigger role.
    Simmons is meh for me, I'd wish he was a better shooter but that doesn't seem like it's going to happen this season. I'd be fine with Mills-Murray-Anderson-Bertans-Dedmon bench, assuming we can keep Mills and Dedmon.

  10. #260
    Body Of Work Mr. Body's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Post Count
    29,455
    Mills leaving means that there is about 22mpg that need to be filled at PG, as Parker's continued to age and decline, he's taken on an increasingly bigger role.
    Simmons is meh for me, I'd wish he was a better shooter but that doesn't seem like it's going to happen this season. I'd be fine with Mills-Murray-Anderson-Bertans-Dedmon bench, assuming we can keep Mills and Dedmon.
    I agree. Simmons is nice to have on a cheap contract, but he seems like Gary Neal with a different skill set.

  11. #261
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    9,839
    Mills and Simmons are expandable, since they wont be here next year. And bench depth doesn`t really matter for playoffs, starters outside Kawhi need to step the up. Not sure if they are worth anything. Maybe Philly would want Mills and give Spurs Covington, since he`ll get less playing time with Simmons ready to go, and they need guads

  12. #262
    Veteran spursistan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    14,864
    The latest from Woj

    A potential trade sending Jimmy Butler from the Bulls to the Celtics will loom over deadline week, according to Adrian Wojnarowski of The Vertical (Twitter link).In a video interview, Wojnarowski says the teams have discussed a deal involving Butler, but talks haven’t progressed very far. He adds that Chicago officials have to to fully commit to the rebuilding process before they would be willing to give up Butler.
    Wojnarowski says the trade would involve one of the Nets’ first-rounders — but probably not both — that Boston owns in the next two drafts. If the Bulls get this year’s pick, Wojnarowski states they can find a replacement for Derrick Rose, who was traded to the Knicks last summer. Washington’s Markelle Fultz and UCLA’s Lonzo Ballare point guards mentioned as likely choices at the top of the draft.
    Teaming Butler with Isaiah Thomas and Al Horford would give the Celtics enough firepower to challenge Cleveland for supremacy in the East, Wojnarowski states, not just this season but for years to come.




    Other highlights from the interview:


    • The Clippers and Thunder are both potential landing spots for Nuggets forward Wilson Chandler. However, both teams are low on draft picks and may not have the assets that Denver would want in return.
    • The Thunder were trying to acquire Kings forward Rudy Gay before a season-ending Achilles injury.
    • The Wizards would like to add another wing player to their bench, with the LakersLou Williams and the NetsBojan Bogdanovic as possibilities. Wojnarowski says Washington is willing to part with a draft pick to get veteran help.
    • The Suns have been shopping P.J. Tucker, Tyson Chandler and Brandon Knight, hoping to get picks or young players in return.
    • Chandler is one of several centers on the market, along with the SixersJahlil Okafor, the MavericksAndrew Bogut, the BucksGreg Monroe and the NetsBrook Lopez. However, there is limited interest in back-to-the basket centers. Wojnarowski speculates that one or two of them may be traded this week, but cautions that there aren’t enough buyers for all of them to be moved.
    • Unless something changes, Carmelo Anthony will remain with the Knicks. New York management hasn’t presented him with any deals that would tempt him to waive his no-trade clause. Most of the teams that were interested in dealing for Anthony are now “looking in other directions,” but Wojnarowski thinks the Clippers might revisit their attempt to land Anthony this summer.

  13. #263
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    10,246
    Watch the butler trade happen, Wade opt out of his player option, and then Spurs foolishly sign him this summer.

  14. #264
    Veteran gambit1990's Avatar
    My Team
    Toronto Raptors
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Post Count
    9,767
    i'll take butler. i'll give them tp (bulls are looking for a PG), two 1st round draft picks and one 2nd round draft pick.

  15. #265
    Dyna5ty BatManu20's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Post Count
    36,495
    i'll take butler. i'll give them tp (bulls are looking for a PG), two 1st round draft picks and one 2nd round draft pick.
    Not sure if serious.

  16. #266
    Shhhh... I'll be gentle. TheDoctor's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    7,025
    i'll take butler. i'll give them tp (bulls are looking for a PG), two 1st round draft picks and one 2nd round draft pick.
    I'll take CoJo instead tbh

  17. #267
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Post Count
    944
    Been through this before, but there seems to be a lot of smoke regarding a DeMarcus Cousins blockbuster. Woj saying NOP is in pursuit.

  18. #268
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    10,246
    Been through this before, but there seems to be a lot of smoke regarding a DeMarcus Cousins blockbuster. Woj saying NOP is in pursuit.
    I saw the NOLA rumor: Buddy Heild, two firsts, and salary match filler for Cousins. That seems like a weak haul for Sacto, but then again Vlade . . .

  19. #269
    Believe. ribcage6foot6's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    26
    I'll take CoJo instead tbh

    Wouldn't be the first time.

  20. #270
    Veteran sasaint's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    14,298
    Not sure if serious.
    I think gambit1990 is serious. Unfortunately neither FO would consider it seriously.

  21. #271
    Veteran sasaint's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    14,298

    Wouldn't be the first time.

  22. #272
    Veteran ace3g's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Post Count
    40,447
    Adrian Wojnarowski @WojVerticalNBA
    4m Sources: Divac delivered to owner Sunday what front office believes are two best Cousins trade proposals. Of course, @Vivek has final say.



  23. #273
    The Dude minds DPG21920's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    77,863
    NBA Trade deadline!!!! Love it. Boogie about to be free of the shackles that are SAC. Go to WAS, BOS or TOR. That would be sick. Get another team in the East to the next level.

    Him and AD would be pretty nasty though. That is scary as if they keep Jrue.

  24. #274
    Erryday I'm Hustlin' Robz4000's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Post Count
    39,737
    NBA Trade deadline!!!! Love it. Boogie about to be free of the shackles that are SAC. Go to WAS, BOS or TOR. That would be sick. Get another team in the East to the next level.

    Him and AD would be pretty nasty though. That is scary as if they keep Jrue.
    If that happens the Spurs might as well blow it up and spend the next few years building up Murray/Bertans while letting Kawhi stat-pad and chase individual honors.

  25. #275
    Hello Moto elemento's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Post Count
    3,101
    Pretty sure Cousins ends up in Phoenix !

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •