Zero evidence for what?
Trump and Pence both got lied to. The word got out that Flynn had lied. Then, and only then, the administration was forced to fire him.
Why did they even fire what they viewed as an excellent man for the job?
the last 25 or so posts above me are complete nonsense
quoting random re s on twitter
Sitll zero evidence![]()
Zero evidence for what?
Trump and Pence both got lied to. The word got out that Flynn had lied. Then, and only then, the administration was forced to fire him.
Why did they even fire what they viewed as an excellent man for the job?
Zero evidence when Trump's own lawyer told on himself. Okay guy![]()
hater is that Don Eugenio in your avatar?
Might as well. You're gonna need some santeria to get out of this one.![]()
Which was a very very stupid move by the Republicans.
It did nothing but elevate the status of a liar.
This is getting pizzagate levels of ridiculousness. Look, if there's some going on, indictments will start flying...
By who? Sessions?![]()
There's plenty of Congress-critters that hate Donny with a passion and that's from his own party. But you need a smoking gun for this .
Realistically, no indictment = no case = nothing happens, nothing else really matters.
Ssshh Trump lawyer apparently is singing. Next watch these morons say Trump evaded taxes and will do time like al capone![]()
well, if trump buys alcatraz, i'd say popcorn time.
House Republicans don't want to touch trump. It's the Senate Republicans that hate Trump.
Congress can't indict.
don't need smoking gun.
house write up articles of impeachment "Trash is an asshole", vote it up, send it to Senate
Senate votes it up, Trash is convicted, Pence is Pres
Congress can certainly call up a special prosecutor and indict. Ask Billy.
how naive
investigations, indictments of politicians are political, not legal, same with anti-trust
when Trash is a political liability for the Repug establishment, they will go with the legal, and there's plenty Trash violations to play with
eg, after talking to Taiwan, he now supports One China to get rewarded with long-sought copyrights in China
impeachment/conviction is a legal charade covering a political act, eg, Clinton's impeachment
I can point fingers in a mul ude of directions, yell out loud, vent on Spurstalk, etc, and think that's going to change something. That's naive.
Unless there's some sort of indictment, nothing is going to happen. That's called being realistic. Trolling for the lol's is fine, tbh, but realistically no amount of twitter posts or YouTubes are going to come up with an indictment.
For now. Wait until the Freedom Caucus looks at his spending plan, then get back to me. I'll be glad to fess up if I'm wrong.
ROFL.
Pizzagate was nothing but a TSA wet dream. There was never ever anything substantive there.
Here we have quite a few inconisistencies with Flynn, Trump and his lawyer.
The fact that Flynn already admitted to lying to the VP is enough to say there is something off kilter here.
Though you're right that an indictment is highly unlikely and nothing else will happen. But this case has weight at least unlike pizzagate.
indictment isn't needed. ing read the Cons ution. House writes, passes the articles of impeachment, Senate votes to convict.
GAMEOVER
Then I think FBI will indict Trash for laundering Russian mob/oligarch $Ms. Will Pence pardon Trash, like Ford pardoned Tricky ?
All Schneiderman has to do is look at the market valuation vs INFLATED sales prices of properties that Trash sold to the Russians, then try to Follow The (laundered) Money out of Trash's org to wherever.
I bet Russians have laundered money through properties in other countries, like London, Paris, HK.
Remember they were stashing $Ms in a Cyprus bank, taken over by Wilbur ing Ross, Trash's Commerce secy, so he could offer the Russians a deal instead of a bail-in haircut?
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...-ties-russians
Watergate prosecutor: Trump knowledge of Russian election hacking would be an impeachable ‘criminal act’
Ben-Veniste told Matthews the difference between the two scandals is that “here you’ve got a foreign power, our adversary, the Russians, who are interfering … with our election, our electoral process.”
“So that’s big,” Ben-Veniste added. “The question is, was Mr. Trump or any of his close associates, somehow involved with the Russians during this course of conduct? And if so, then that would be huge.”
“If there was such activity, then this would be a criminal act that would be of the upmost seriousness to this country,” he said.
Comparing Nixon with Donald Trump, Dean said Nixon “worked behind the scenes” to undermine the press, adding “So far, Trump has been right out front” with his criticism of the media.
Ben-Veniste added there’s a difference between Trump and Nixon in terms of preparedness for the job, arguing Nixon was “eminently prepared” to be president of the United States.
“This is on-the-job training for President Trump, and one can only hope he utilizes the vast resources that are available to the President of the United States, and pick people who say ‘No’ to him,” Ben-Veniste said.
“This is what was Nixon’s downfall, he surrounded himself with people who catered to his dark side.”
http://www.rawstory.com/2017/02/wate...-criminal-act/
Accepting to work for Trash means one won't be "disloyal" since Trash values loyalty to himself as the supreme attribute.
I wonder if McMaster will really last after clashing with Bannon, Miller, Priebus, Gorka, Pompeo?
Last edited by boutons_deux; 02-21-2017 at 08:52 AM.
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)