the league is pretty watered down.
This!What a strange meltdown over Lou Williams, tbh
He's having a great season, but can't ignore that he's one of the worst playoff performers of this generation..his career TS% in 41 playoff games is 46.8%, which is historically bad..
As I said earlier in this thread, most players who rely heavily on fouls(flailing, flopping, etc) don't perform well in the playoffs..
Nothing worse than casuals who are okay with being reg season paper tigers and second round exit fodder
Replace "casuals" with "the front office " and you'll find something worse.
What's funny about many posters here is that they'll on certain Spurs players and call them scrubs(Green, Mills, Anderson, etc) but then use those same guys in their trade scenarios for star players
"Green and Mills suck, but maybe we can trade them for Anthony Davis!!"
"Kyle Anderson is the worst player in the NBA, but I think we could get Isaiah Thomas for him!"
That is puro SpursTalk Holmes
I can give you a list of teams that have it worse and they do make trades. My point is when you're doing this good it's not easy to risk that when you can end up making worse. The front office went out and got Dedmon, Lee and Pau. Fools like you will never be happy.
spurs biggest problem is playing parker as many minutes as they do.
I disagree. Ginobili's made a career out of it and he turned out pretty OK.What a strange meltdown over Lou Williams, tbh
He's having a great season, but can't ignore that he's one of the worst playoff performers of this generation..his career TS% in 41 playoff games is 46.8%, which is historically bad..
As I said earlier in this thread, most players who rely heavily on fouls(flailing, flopping, etc) don't perform well in the playoffs..
At the end of the day, as ty as the Mavs have been. They still had the same amount of success as us over the past decade.
Delusional casuals like yourself only encourage PATFO to be fat and happy
There is no argument to be made that Dallas has had the level of success as SAGet outta here lol
1 championship in a decade = 1 championship in a decadeThere is no argument to be made that Dallas has had the level of success as SA
lmao regular season warriors
Good job dodging the fact that I mentioned them actually going out and getting good players and you wanting more. You think they got those players to not compete for a championshi! Lmao "casual fan" get out of here kid.
Spurs will be playing in the playoffs and the Mavericks will be sitting at home watching the playoffs.
What the are you talking about we won 2 out of the last 10 championships.
Only Lakers and Heat have had that kind of success, and they are not even playoff teams anymore.
Should've been more specific. 1 ring in 9 1/2 years. Soon to be 1 in 10 with the guards on the team
So two championships in ten years. Better than the Warriors and the Cavs.
If the Spurs are going to get something of value they will need to trade something valuable. You can't expect Mills/Anderson/Forbes etc to get much in return. Other teams would likely want Murray and/or Bertans. I don't see the Spurs going that route but I'd still like them to trade for someone like McLemore or Barton. The team desperately needs to improve it's guards.
It's not about being specific you were just wrong. Anyways, your arbitrary 1 ring in 9 1/2 years means there are no current playoff teams that have been more successful then the Mavs.
Nets are only wanting a 1st and 2nd round pick for Lopez, not too bad at all.
paging Hoops CzarWhat's funny about many posters here is that they'll on certain Spurs players and call them scrubs(Green, Mills, Anderson, etc) but then use those same guys in their trade scenarios for star players
"Green and Mills suck, but maybe we can trade them for Anthony Davis!!"
"Kyle Anderson is the worst player in the NBA, but I think we could get Isaiah Thomas for him!"
Do people who wanted the Spurs to trade for Lou Williams would also want them to keep Dedmon? If they want to keep him at a price above MLE then they'd need to increase the cap space, not reduce it by taking on longer contracts.
Jimmy Butler is my main target. Do you think the Spurs have any interest, or do you guys think that Chicago wouldn't want anything we can offer? I'd be open to trading anyone not named Kawhi or LaMarcus for him. Not sure if I'd add Dedmon to that no-trade list. I'd even consider Lamarcus too if we get a decent PF back in return. Murray, I wouldn't have a problem with including either as I'm pretty sure Jimmy can play PG too? If they could somehow get him without trading Kawhi or LaMarcus, I think that would be a pretty great trio to have and build around.
Are the Bulls looking to move him, or are they only interested if they get an offer that they really like? Are they looking to blow it up? I mean, they didn't make the playoffs last season and they're not looking too great this season either, so I wonder what they are looking to do?
They want a Nets pick and 2 good young prospects. Spurs have none of this.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote