Reply With Quote
Dude, he had phlebitis. That's why he left office.
Not at all.
There's an election in four years. Ifnit appears anytime before then that POTUS is too conflicted and has become a political liability, the US Congress will throw him overboard.
Dude, he had phlebitis. That's why he left office.
the phlebitis was real, but...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impeac..._Richard_NixonOn the night of August 7, 1974, Senators Barry Goldwater and Hugh Scott and Representative John Rhodes met with Nixon in the Oval Office and told him that his support in Congress had all but disappeared. Rhodes told Nixon that he would face certain impeachment when the articles came up for vote in the full House. Goldwater and Scott told the president that there were not only enough votes in the Senate to convict him, but that no more than 15 Senators were willing to vote for acquittal – far fewer than the 34 he needed to avoid removal from office
on the night of August 8, 1974, Nixon took to the airwaves and delivered SP 3-125: Presidential Address Announcing His Intention to Resign the Oval Office. And then on the day of August 9, 1974, Nixon became the first, and so far only, president to resign
Convenient excuse. He was gonna get arrested before he re-signed.
People with verifiable information
Bill Clinton remains the sole duly elected President to be IMPEACHED.
No journalist names sources. None.
McM is NSA not Comrade Flynn
For someone who likes to post leaks and , you sure know jack of how whistle blowers, anonymous sources, etc works.
I mean, isn't that one of wikileaks motto? Never reveal sources?
Journalists name sources every day.
Wikileaks verifies information and produces the actual do ents.For someone who likes to post leaks and , you sure know jack of how whistle blowers, anonymous sources, etc works.
I mean, isn't that one of wikileaks motto? Never reveal sources?
The information that have surface so far has panned out. The Flynn thing was dead on. And giving that the FBI is actually investigating possible russian hacking, someone on the inside and in the know is talking to the media and leaking this stuff.
Also, didn't Trump himself said the leaks were real?
He also said the news was fake.
The FBI already investigated and listened to the Flynn phone calls and said they found no wrongdoing and no illicit ties to Russia.
Trump said the leaking was real, not that leaks themselves were real.
What information that has surfaced from anonymous sources has panned out? What information from anonymous sources has been verified?
Which is ing re ed.
You cant say the news is fake...but the leaks are real when the media was the one who reported it.
LMAO you're such a tool. Goalpost mover. outta here.
I'm directly addressing your post.
This is the second time recently you've tried to claim a goalpost move and I'm now convinced you don't know what the term implies.
Now you have three questions to answer.
What information that has surfaced from anonymous sources has panned out?
What information from anonymous sources has been verified?
What goalpost did I move?
"Anonymous WH source says Trump has a vagina"Which is ing re ed.
You cant say the news is fake...but the leaks are real when the media was the one who reported it.
the leak is real, the news is fake.
See how that works
You're the biggest goalpost moving got in here. Not to mention you're tty at spinning things too.
I just posted that Trump himself said the leaks were real which means the stuff that's being leaked is real and you go on a tangent about how Trump meant this and not that. That is moving the goalpost.
Your main point was crushed so you try to make it into something else to continue the pointless arguement.
He discussed sanctions with the Russian Ambassador and then lied about it. Why lie about it?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.7b4930355b9c
That isn't moving the goalpost that is correcting you when you are wrong.
Trump did say that leaks were real, as in leaks were happening. Trump never said the contents of the leaks were real, in fact he said the opposite.
How can you say my main point has been crushed when you've now twice refused to address it?
No it's not.
One example would be what Pelicans just posted. You're correcting me for posting correct facts? LOL
You're doing it again. You move the goalpost constantly. It isnt something new with you.
You like putting words in people's mouth. Specially ones who have gone on the record. It's not your job to interpret something somebody said..repeately and then try to shill for them saying no, this is what he meant.
No idea why he lied about it as the FBI said there was no wrongdoing or anything illicit on Flynn's part.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.was...32c_story.html
Lol Flynn is getting immunity to snitch on those rat bas s.
There are currently 4 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 4 guests)
Posting Permissions