R.I.P. CNN

[rmt]

Ben Stein goes off on CNN

LOL - this lady sees the SC nominee as CNN giving GOOD coverage about Trump - more likely crowing about his comments about Trump.

Then he falls into her trap connecting situation with Trump to Nixon/Watergate - negates all the previous stuff he said about msm smearing Trump.

[rasuo214]

why are you quoting two of my posts instead of explaining your re ed false equivalency?

nothing obama ever said was as ridiculous as half of the your current president tweets on a daily basis.

I didn't say Obama = Trump, I said a lot of this is deja vu because of how the left is acting a lot like the right did when Obama was elected.

Stupid requests for do entation

Angry protests

Crazy conspiracies.

[Reck]

Crazy conspiracies.

Of which conspiracies are you referring to?

[spurraider21]

Lol Ben stein

[rasuo214]

Of which conspiracies are you referring to?

The Russian , Trump's a Russian spy, Russians hacked the election, pissgate etc.

[Th'Pusher]

The Russian , Trump's a Russian spy, Russians hacked the election, pissgate etc.

I have no doubt you lack the capacity to finish this article, much less comprehend half of what it says, but I'll link it anyway. Maybe someone else will appreciate it.

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/20...e-new-cold-war

[Reck]

The Russian , Trump's a Russian spy, Russians hacked the election, pissgate etc.

The FBI is conducting several investigations into Russian hacking the election. That's not a conspiracy. It's a fact.

https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/a...s-russia-calls

[rasuo214]

The FBI is conducting several investigations into Russian hacking the election. That's not a conspiracy. It's a fact.

https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/a...s-russia-calls

First of all investigating something does not make it a fact. Second did you read the article? They are investigating Russian influence not whether the elections were hacked.

The FBI has two parallel ongoing investigations, one official said. A counterintelligence investigation is looking at Russian espionage activities and to what extent, if any, they involve communications with or collusion by U.S. officials. The second, a cybersecurity investigation, is probing the hacking of U.S. political groups and operatives.

There is no evidence that the elections were hacked, let alone that the Russians were involved. So yes it is a conspiracy.

[rasuo214]

I have no doubt you lack the capacity to finish this article, much less comprehend half of what it says, but I'll link it anyway. Maybe someone else will appreciate it.

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/20...e-new-cold-war

I are 2 stoopid to read artcle.

[Reck]

There is no evidence that the elections were hacked, let alone that the Russians were involved. So yes it is a conspiracy.

Koolaid drinker.

Why dont I let one of your own inform you..

Minute 1:55 if you're too lazy

[DarrinS]

Hacking and collusion are different. Keep digging

[rasuo214]

Koolaid drinker.

Why dont I let one of your own inform you..

Minute 1:55 if you're too lazy

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that maybe you're confusing Russian influence or hacking the DNC/Podesta emails with hacking the election. Just so you know, they are completely different things. Here I'll help you out with the following questions:


Which states were hacked? Which systems were hacked? What were the vulnerabilities? Have they been corrected? How did the Russians accomplish this? How did this impact the votes, did the hacking suppress votes/inflate etc.

[DMC]

I have no doubt you lack the capacity to finish this article, much less comprehend half of what it says, but I'll link it anyway. Maybe someone else will appreciate it.

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/20...e-new-cold-war

say one of the sloppiest, least educated posters on the forum, the proverbial turd in the punchbowl.

[Reck]

Hacking and collusion are different. Keep digging

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that maybe you're confusing Russian influence or hacking the DNC/Podesta emails with hacking the election. Just so you know, they are completely different things. Here I'll help you out with the following questions:


Which states were hacked? Which systems were hacked? What were the vulnerabilities? Have they been corrected? How did the Russians accomplish this? How did this impact the votes, did the hacking suppress votes/inflate etc.

Lol dip s.

Specially you Darrin. What a re .

I just posted the vid of him saying it. A top republican. Those words are not coming out of my mouth.

As for all your questions, why don't we let the FBI and senate committee finish their investigations into Russia?

[Spurminator]

Is the argument that somehow collusion in our election is better than hacking?

[rasuo214]

Lol dip s.

Specially you Darrin. What a re .

I just posted the vid of him saying it. A top republican. Those words are not coming out of my mouth.

As for all your questions, why don't we let the FBI and senate committee finish their investigations into Russia?

Ok I was giving you the benefit of the doubt but now you are confirming that you are in fact an idiot.

[Th'Pusher]

say one of the sloppiest, least educated posters on the forum, the proverbial turd in the punchbowl.

[rasuo214]

Is the argument that somehow collusion in our election is better than hacking?

I wasn't making any arguments. All I said was that it was a conspiracy that the Russians hacked the elections. Reck, like the idiot that he is, took the bait.

[DMC]

You drooling got, going around trying to talk down to people from your subservient life position. What a tool

[Reck]

Ok I was giving you the benefit of the doubt but now you are confirming that you are in fact an idiot.

Rich. I'm the idiot while you claim everything is a conspiracy. Ok then.

[rasuo214]

Rich. I'm the idiot while you claim everything is a conspiracy. Ok then.

Embarrassing. Instead of admitting that you were wrong you opt to continue with your idiocy. Go back to one of your progressive circle jerks so you can feel enlightened.

[Reck]

Embarrassing. Instead of admitting that you were wrong you opt to continue with your idiocy. Go back to one of your progressive circle jerks so you can feel enlightened.

TSA in drags.

[rasuo214]

The Russians hacked the election. Fact because investigations on alleged Russian influence. Duh, idiots.

[Adam Lambert]

I didn't say Obama = Trump, I said a lot of this is deja vu because of how the left is acting a lot like the right did when Obama was elected.

Stupid requests for do entation

Angry protests

Crazy conspiracies.

no you said the last president with skin as thin as trumps was obama

[TheSanityAnnex]

I have no doubt you lack the capacity to finish this article, much less comprehend half of what it says, but I'll link it anyway. Maybe someone else will appreciate it.

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/20...e-new-cold-war

"Critics of the report have repeatedly noted that intelligence agencies, in the months before the Iraq War, endorsed faulty assessments concerning weapons of mass destruction. But the intelligence community was deeply divided over the actual extent of Iraq’s weapons development; the question of Russia’s responsibility for cyberattacks in the 2016 election has produced no such tumult. Seventeen federal intelligence agencies have agreed that Russia was responsible for the hacking."

I tried to appreciate it but had to stop reading after this.