R.I.P. CNN

[TheSanityAnnex]

Embarrassing. Instead of admitting that you were wrong you opt to continue with your idiocy.

His idiocy is what stops him from admitting he was wrong as he truly believes he is right.

[TheSanityAnnex]

I have no doubt you lack the capacity to finish this article, much less comprehend half of what it says, but I'll link it anyway. Maybe someone else will appreciate it.

http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/20...e-new-cold-war

Maybe you will appreciate it.

https://theintercept.com/2016/12/14/...ts-not-enough/

[Reck]

His idiocy is what stops him from admitting he was wrong as he truly believes he is right.

Replying to yourself. gotness intensifies.

[rasuo214]

no you said the last president with skin as thin as trumps was obama

I did, but the comparisons were about how the supporters reacted to each president. Obama was fairly thin-skinned and didn't respond well to criticism (Fox News). Luckily for him he was mostly loved by the media and wasn't called a Fascist/Anti-Semite 2 months into his presidency.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Replying to yourself. gotness intensifies.

thinking that's my alt
further confirming your idiocy

[TheSanityAnnex]

I did, but the comparisons were about how the supporters reacted to each president. Obama was fairly thin-skinned and didn't respond well to criticism (Fox News). Luckily for him he was mostly loved by the media and wasn't called a Fascist/Anti-Semite 2 months into his presidency.

Apparently the political forum dunce thinks we are the same poster

[rasuo214]

Replying to yourself. gotness intensifies.

At thinking we're the same person. Who else would dare call you out for being an idiot? Right? Clearly has to be the same person.

[rasuo214]

Apparently the political forum dunce thinks we are the same poster

Oh we're posting at the same time. Clearly this confirms it.

[Reck]

posting in unison.

TSA, the troll game is not for you. You dont know how to do it. You're too transparent and stupid to pull it off. rofl

[TheSanityAnnex]

posting in unison.

TSA, the troll game is not for you. You dont know how to do it. You're too transparent and stupid to pull it off. rofl

The only stupid one here is the one who thinks I am posting from two accounts.

[Reck]

Talks about crazy conspiracy=CHECK
Likes to answer questions with another question=CHECK
Likes to break down posts point by point=CHECK
Gets defensive with the snap of a finger=CHECK
Claims he's not for Trump but semen shields for him every post=CHECK

[TheSanityAnnex]

hey dip , want to bet your account that we are not the same poster?

[Reck]

There he is flying off the handle.

Deny! Deny! Deny!

[Th'Pusher]

You drooling got, going around trying to talk down to people from your subservient life position. What a tool

[rasuo214]

Talks about crazy conspiracy=CHECK
Likes to answer questions with another question=CHECK
Likes to break down posts point by point=CHECK
Gets defensive with the snap of a finger=CHECK
Claims he's not for Trump but semen shields for him every post=CHECK

You were the one talking about the crazy conspiracy theory (oh no you might be TSA, clever calling out someone else as an alt to hide your alt status) and you must be sensitive as if you think a neutral comment equals semen shielding.

[TheSanityAnnex]

There he is flying off the handle.

Deny! Deny! Deny!

Do you want to bet your account we aren't the same poster?

[Th'Pusher]

"Critics of the report have repeatedly noted that intelligence agencies, in the months before the Iraq War, endorsed faulty assessments concerning weapons of mass destruction. But the intelligence community was deeply divided over the actual extent of Iraq’s weapons development; the question of Russia’s responsibility for cyberattacks in the 2016 election has produced no such tumult. Seventeen federal intelligence agencies have agreed that Russia was responsible for the hacking."

I tried to appreciate it but had to stop reading after this.

Did the USIC not put out this statement:

"The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and ins utions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.".

[Reck]

You were the one talking about the crazy conspiracy theory (oh no you might be TSA, clever calling out someone else as an alt to hide your alt status) and you must be sensitive as if you think a neutral comment equals semen shielding.

I was? Read my OP to you, I asked you the question of what was conspiratorial about the Russia thing.

I'm behind an alt.

[Reck]

Do you want to bet your account we aren't the same poster?

No need.

[TheSanityAnnex]

You were the one talking about the crazy conspiracy theory (oh no you might be TSA, clever calling out someone else as an alt to hide your alt status) and you must be sensitive as if you think a neutral comment equals semen shielding.

I don't have the creativity to create an alt with the daily stupidity that comes from Reck.

[Reck]

I don't have the creativity to create an alt with the daily stupidity that comes from Reck.

Says the guy that has a 40+ pedo pizza conspiracy thread? Sad

[TheSanityAnnex]

Did the USIC not put out this statement:

"The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of e-mails from US persons and ins utions, including from US political organizations. The recent disclosures of alleged hacked e-mails on sites like DCLeaks.com and WikiLeaks and by the Guccifer 2.0 online persona are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process. Such activity is not new to Moscow—the Russians have used similar tactics and techniques across Europe and Eurasia, for example, to influence public opinion there. We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities.".

NSA wasn't confident. FBI wasn't even allowed in the DNC servers. The entire USIC investigation was based off a Clinton funded CrowdStrike report. The USIC report was shredded by private sector security experts.

[rasuo214]

I was? Read my OP to you, I asked you the question of what was conspiratorial about the Russia thing.

I'm behind an alt.

I said both sides believed in conspiracy theories about each president. Not that I believed in them. You asked what I thought was a conspiracy theory. I listed them and you proceeded to defend a conspiracy theory over several posts. So yes it was you who was discussing conspiracy theories. BTW my alt comment was sarcasm.

[TheSanityAnnex]

No need.

No need to be a pussy. It's time for once you stood behind one of your idiotic claims.

[Th'Pusher]

NSA wasn't confident. FBI wasn't even allowed in the DNC servers. The entire USIC investigation was based off a Clinton funded CrowdStrike report. The USIC report was shredded by private sector security experts.

Did the private sector security experts see the classified report? Did Donald Trump go from questioning Russia's involvement to begrudgingly accepting Russia was responsible for the hacking and shifting his position to "but it had no effect on the outcome of the election" after reading/having the classified report read to him?

I can appreciate The Intercept's position as the evidence that was publicly made available was lacking (which was also acknowledged in the New Yorker article) and I agree the American people deserve that information. But absent that evidence, and considering the fact that there is no person or agency that had had access to the classified report that still denies Russia was responsible for the hacking, I draw my own conclusions. If you can provide a person/agency that had access to the classified report that denies Russia was responsible, I'll happily concede the point.