spurs with parker are 28-10, .737
spurs without parker are 11-2, .846
spurs with parker are 28-10, .737
spurs without parker are 11-2, .846
hey OP, spurs record is still much better in games parker doesn't play.
Interesting considering Parker is the winningest player in NBA history. By your logic, Spurs should attribute their winning more to him than to Duncan.
It used to be the Spurs would be much better replacing Parker with Skatty but, not even a homer would agree with that now. I see you're changing your shticks on the fly.
what the are you talking about?i'll still take patty over parker, nothing's changed. especially not how stupid you are.
spurs with parker: 34-11, .756
spurs without parker: 12-2, .857
The 27yr old X-Men fan finally showed up lmfao. Finally ditched the skirt
You're tin me right gambit. With Parker playing, not Mills ing the bed, this would have been a comfortable win for the Spurs.
This might be the best backfire thread of the season.
Spurs need to be almost perfect with Tony playing to beat the no-tp spurs.
Lets hope they are and go for the 1st seed.
Point guards with a combined 3-13 shooting performance. MVParker heal up soon
what? we played the pacers a couple weeks ago... tony played... and it was a close game until the end.
Loved Murray's second-half stint, but the gap between him and Parker is huge.
spurs now 7-0 when murray starts.
Yup. Don't think this game comes down to the wire if TP plays
tbh fwiw, Spurs needed Tony tonite!
They lost the first half with Murray starting and had to put in Patty in after the break to stop the bleeding.
You mean there's a huge gap between their respective girth, right? Let's not fall into recency bias. The Pork recently had a two-game stretch where he had two points total. Murray's 5 game stretch earlier in the season was amazing. Even if Porker is the better option, he's too washed up and Murray isn't bad enough for there to be a big gap between the two.
OK subtract out Mills 2 points on 1/7 and add in Parkers 12 points on 4/8 and what do you have? A nice 11 point win. But keep on plugging away with your Parker schtick.
"Let's not fall into recency bias"
Only bumps this thread when Parker looks bad or Murray looks good.
I see you viewing the thread, Silver&Black. Just wanted to let you know that you are missed in game threads, brah. No .
edit: I thought this was the game thread but i stand by the statement
And Murray didn't even look that good tonight tbh. The whole 7-0 when he starts thing is silly, but I know it fits what's being driven by this thread
that hypothetical won't get you anywhere.
read the thread le then read this:
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)