Page 5 of 7 FirstFirst 1234567 LastLast
Results 101 to 125 of 164
  1. #101
    Rum and Coke SupremeGuy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Post Count
    10,795
    parker fans avoiding this thread like the plague.

    spurs are 3-3 over tony's last 6 starts.

  2. #102
    Veteran gambit1990's Avatar
    My Team
    Toronto Raptors
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Post Count
    9,767
    spurs with parker are 28-10, .737
    spurs without parker are 11-2, .846

  3. #103
    Veteran gambit1990's Avatar
    My Team
    Toronto Raptors
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Post Count
    9,767
    hey OP, spurs record is still much better in games parker doesn't play.

  4. #104
    Veteran SASdynasty!'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Post Count
    3,317
    Interesting considering Parker is the winningest player in NBA history. By your logic, Spurs should attribute their winning more to him than to Duncan.

  5. #105
    Winner in a losers circle 140's Avatar
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Post Count
    6,846
    spurs with parker are 28-10, .737
    spurs without parker are 11-2, .846

  6. #106
    Guest Personality Hoops Czar's Avatar
    My Team
    Cleveland Cavaliers
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Post Count
    8,541
    spurs with parker are 28-10, .737
    spurs without parker are 11-2, .846
    It used to be the Spurs would be much better replacing Parker with Skatty but, not even a homer would agree with that now. I see you're changing your shticks on the fly.

  7. #107
    Veteran gambit1990's Avatar
    My Team
    Toronto Raptors
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Post Count
    9,767
    It used to be the Spurs would be much better replacing Parker with Skatty but, not even a homer would agree with that now. I see you're changing your shticks on the fly.
    what the are you talking about? i'll still take patty over parker, nothing's changed. especially not how stupid you are.

  8. #108
    Veteran gambit1990's Avatar
    My Team
    Toronto Raptors
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Post Count
    9,767
    spurs with parker: 34-11, .756
    spurs without parker: 12-2, .857

  9. #109
    Pronouns: Your/Dad TheGreatYacht's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Post Count
    36,459
    The 27yr old X-Men fan finally showed up lmfao. Finally ditched the skirt

  10. #110
    Mahinmi in ? picnroll's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    11,245
    You're tin me right gambit. With Parker playing, not Mills ing the bed, this would have been a comfortable win for the Spurs.

  11. #111
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Post Count
    2,584
    spurs with parker: 34-11, .756
    spurs without parker: 12-2, .857
    This might be the best backfire thread of the season.
    Spurs need to be almost perfect with Tony playing to beat the no-tp spurs.
    Lets hope they are and go for the 1st seed.

  12. #112
    Pronouns: Your/Dad TheGreatYacht's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Post Count
    36,459
    Point guards with a combined 3-13 shooting performance. MVParker heal up soon

  13. #113
    Veteran gambit1990's Avatar
    My Team
    Toronto Raptors
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Post Count
    9,767
    Spurs CLEARLY missing the head of the snake. Aren't even a .500 team without him.

    What the do these armchair GM's know tbh
    spurs with parker: 34-11, .756
    spurs without parker: 12-2, .857

  14. #114
    Veteran gambit1990's Avatar
    My Team
    Toronto Raptors
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Post Count
    9,767
    You're tin me right gambit. With Parker playing, not Mills ing the bed, this would have been a comfortable win for the Spurs.
    what? we played the pacers a couple weeks ago... tony played... and it was a close game until the end.

  15. #115
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    Loved Murray's second-half stint, but the gap between him and Parker is huge.

  16. #116
    Veteran gambit1990's Avatar
    My Team
    Toronto Raptors
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Post Count
    9,767
    Loved Murray's second-half stint, but the gap between him and Parker is huge.
    spurs now 7-0 when murray starts.

  17. #117
    Veteran bklynspursfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Post Count
    15,095
    Loved Murray's second-half stint, but the gap between him and Parker is huge.
    Yup. Don't think this game comes down to the wire if TP plays

  18. #118
    Gif-ted LakerHater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Post Count
    17,263
    tbh fwiw, Spurs needed Tony tonite!

  19. #119
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    spurs now 7-0 when murray starts.
    They lost the first half with Murray starting and had to put in Patty in after the break to stop the bleeding.

  20. #120
    Derrick White fanboy FkLA's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    25,085
    Loved Murray's second-half stint, but the gap between him and Parker is huge.
    You mean there's a huge gap between their respective girth, right? Let's not fall into recency bias. The Pork recently had a two-game stretch where he had two points total. Murray's 5 game stretch earlier in the season was amazing. Even if Porker is the better option, he's too washed up and Murray isn't bad enough for there to be a big gap between the two.

  21. #121
    Mahinmi in ? picnroll's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    11,245
    what? we played the pacers a couple weeks ago... tony played... and it was a close game until the end.
    OK subtract out Mills 2 points on 1/7 and add in Parkers 12 points on 4/8 and what do you have? A nice 11 point win. But keep on plugging away with your Parker schtick.

  22. #122
    Machacarredes Chinook's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Post Count
    32,115
    You mean there's a huge gap between their respective girth, right? Let's not fall into recency bias. The Pork recently had a two-game stretch where he had two points total. Murray's 5 game stretch earlier in the season was amazing. Even if Porker is the better option, he's too washed up and Murray isn't bad enough for there to be a big gap between the two.
    "Let's not fall into recency bias"

    Only bumps this thread when Parker looks bad or Murray looks good.

  23. #123
    Derrick White fanboy FkLA's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    25,085
    I see you viewing the thread, Silver&Black. Just wanted to let you know that you are missed in game threads, brah. No .

    edit: I thought this was the game thread but i stand by the statement

  24. #124
    Veteran bklynspursfan's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Post Count
    15,095
    "Let's not fall into recency bias"

    Only bumps this thread when Parker looks bad or Murray looks good.
    And Murray didn't even look that good tonight tbh. The whole 7-0 when he starts thing is silly, but I know it fits what's being driven by this thread

  25. #125
    Veteran gambit1990's Avatar
    My Team
    Toronto Raptors
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Post Count
    9,767
    OK subtract out Mills 2 points on 1/7 and add in Parkers 12 points on 4/8 and what do you have? A nice 11 point win. But keep on plugging away with your Parker schtick.
    that hypothetical won't get you anywhere.

    read the thread le then read this:
    spurs with parker: 34-11, .756
    spurs without parker: 12-2, .857

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •